CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Lophophora fricii ? Options
 
ntwhtyouknw
#1 Posted : 8/15/2012 9:39:40 PM

You do not have to see alike, feel alike or even think alike in order spiritually to be alike


Posts: 703
Joined: 24-Aug-2011
Last visit: 10-Jul-2014
Location: USA

I just stumbled upon some old articles on this Lophophora species. Some documents stated it is a variety of diffusa which is legal in the U.S., some stated it is a williamsii and it does resemble it very much as it flowers pink. It appears maybe that neither of those titles are taxonomically correct and this cactus is in a grey area scientifically, but is it legally in a grey area? I read it does contain Mescaline but can't be certain.

I hope I'm not breaking the rules on this thread, I'm not looking to acquire these seeds per say, I am however interested in the possible legal status and any more recent info one might be able to share with me.
Toadfreak!

Travel like a king
Listen to the inner voice
A higher wisdom is at work for you
Conquering the stumbling blocks come easier
When the conqueror is in tune with the infinite
Every ending is a new beginning
Life is an endless unfoldment
Change your mind, and you change your relation to time
Free your mind and the rest will follow
 

Live plants. Sustainable, ethically sourced, native American owned.
 
mew
#2 Posted : 8/15/2012 9:45:03 PM

huachumancer


Posts: 1285
Joined: 02-Aug-2008
Last visit: 21-Sep-2024
Location: earf
from my understanding there are species of peyote that are legal, however more often than not the alkaloid content/rate of development is inferior to high quality trichocereus and l williamsii
 
ntwhtyouknw
#3 Posted : 8/15/2012 9:52:07 PM

You do not have to see alike, feel alike or even think alike in order spiritually to be alike


Posts: 703
Joined: 24-Aug-2011
Last visit: 10-Jul-2014
Location: USA
So perhaps it may be legal. I cannot seem to find a definitive answer in my searches. I would have to suggest it may be legal since I can't even find out for sure the taxonomy, whether it is diffusa or williamsii. Although I can't find a single U.S. source for the seeds so that leads me to believe vendors don't wish to sell it for possible legal consequence, unless it is just not well known enough. Perhaps I'm just not looking in the right place, I've been googling relentlessly to find a single source for legal info or seeds as well. On a thread I read earlier (myco or shroom ry) someone stated he grows both fricii and williamsii, and although he has never tested them for potency, in bioassay he could not tell much of a difference in potency. Certainly needs some research.
Toadfreak!

Travel like a king
Listen to the inner voice
A higher wisdom is at work for you
Conquering the stumbling blocks come easier
When the conqueror is in tune with the infinite
Every ending is a new beginning
Life is an endless unfoldment
Change your mind, and you change your relation to time
Free your mind and the rest will follow
 
SnozzleBerry
#4 Posted : 8/15/2012 11:28:28 PM

omnia sunt communia!

Moderator | Skills: Growing (plants/mushrooms), Research, Extraction troubleshooting, Harmalas, Revolution (theory/practice)

Posts: 6024
Joined: 29-Jul-2009
Last visit: 29-Oct-2021
If it contains mescaline and you know/believe that it contains mescaline it is illegal for you to possess it. If it contains mescaline and you are unsure if it contains mescaline and you perform an extraction in the hopes of isolating mescaline, it (and your extraction) are illegal. The way the CSA is worded, it's all about that mens rea.
WikiAttitudeFAQ
The NexianNexus ResearchThe OHT
In New York, we wrote the legal number on our arms in marker...To call a lawyer if we were arrested.
In Istanbul, People wrote their blood types on their arms. I hear in Egypt, They just write Their names.
גם זה יעבור
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.025 seconds.