A quote from Grant Oyston about the Kony campaign... made me think again
"I do not doubt for a second that those involved in KONY 2012 have great intentions, nor do I doubt for a second that Joseph Kony is a very evil man. But despite this, Iām strongly opposed to supporting the KONY 2012 campaign.
KONY 2012 is the product of a group called Invisible Children, a controversial activist group and not-for-profit. Theyāve released 11 films, most with an accompanying bracelet colour (KONY 2012 is fittingly red), all of which focus on Joseph Kony. When we buy merch from them, when we link to their video, when we put up posters linking to their website, we support the organization. I donāt think thatās a good thing, and Iām not alone.
Invisible Children has been condemned time and time again. As a registered not-for-profit, its finances are public. Last year, the organization spent $8,676,614. Only 31% went to their charity program (page 6). This is far from ideal, and Charity Navigator rates their accountability 2/5 stars because they havenāt had their finances externally audited. But it goes way deeper than that.
The group is in favour of direct military intervention, and their money funds the Ugandan governmentās army and various other military forces. Hereās a photo of the founders of Invisible Children posing with weapons and personnel of the Sudan Peopleās Liberation Army. Both the Ugandan army and Sudan Peopleās Liberation Army are riddled with accusations of rape and looting, but Invisible Children defends them, arguing that the Ugandan army is ābetter equipped than that of any of the other affected countriesā, although Kony is no longer active in Uganda and hasnāt been since 2006 by their own admission.
Still, the bulk of Invisible Childrenās spending isnāt on funding African militias, but on awareness and filmmaking. Which can be great, except that Foreign Affairs has claimed that Invisible Children (among others) āmanipulates facts for strategic purposes, exaggerating the scale of LRA abductions and murders and emphasizing the LRAās use of innocent children as soldiers, and portraying Kony ā a brutal man, to be sure ā as uniquely awful, a Kurtz-like embodiment of evil.ā Heās certainly evil, but exaggeration and manipulation to capture the public eye is unproductive, unprofessional and dishonest.
As Christ Blattman, a political scientist at Yale, writes on the topic of ICās programming, āThereās also something inherently misleading, naive, maybe even dangerous, about the idea of rescuing children or saving of Africa. [ā¦] It hints uncomfortably of the White Manās Burden. Worse, sometimes it does more than hint. The savior attitude is pervasive in advocacy, and it inevitably shapes programming. Usually misconceived programming.ā
Still, Konyās a bad guy, and heās been around a while. Which is why the US has been involved in stopping him for years. U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) has sent multiple missions to capture or kill Kony over the years. And theyāve failed time and time again, each provoking a ferocious response and increased retaliative slaughter. The issue with taking out a man who uses a child army is that his bodyguards are children. Any effort to capture or kill him will almost certainly result in many childrenās deaths, an impact that needs to be minimized as much as possible. Each attempt brings more retaliation. And yet Invisible Children funds this military intervention. Kony has been involved in peace talks in the past, which have fallen through. But Invisible Children is now focusing on military intervention.
Military intervention may or may not be the right idea, but people supporting KONY 2012 probably donāt realize theyāre helping fund the Ugandan military who are themselves raping and looting away. If people know this and still support Invisible Children because they feel itās the best solution based on their knowledge and research, I have no issue with that. But I donāt think most people are in that position, and thatās a problem.
Is awareness good? Yes. But these problems are highly complex, not one-dimensional and, frankly, arenāt of the nature that can be solved by postering, film-making and changing your Facebook profile picture, as hard as that is to swallow. Giving your money and public support to Invisible Children so they can spend it on funding ill-advised violent intervention and movie #12 isnāt helping. Do I have a better answer? No, I donāt, but that doesnāt mean that you should support KONY 2012 just because itās something. Something isnāt always better than nothing. Sometimes itās worse.
If you want to write to your Member of Parliament or your Senator or the President or the Prime Minister, by all means, go ahead. If you want to post about Joseph Konyās crimes on Facebook, go ahead. But letās keep it about Joseph Kony, not KONY 2012."
~ Grant Oyston,
visiblechildren@grantoyston.com