When doing any kind of procedure that involves FASA it is always mentioned to add the Fumaric Acid saturated Acetone slowly to avoid creation of Mono-DMT fumarate. Fumaric acid is a di-valent acid so it can bind with 2 carboxylic groups to a respective base, therefore binding 2x DMT with only 1x Acid molecule.
The theory is when FASA is added too fast, it might create a local excess of Fumaric Acid which is prone to only bind 1 DMT molecule and thus may create a salt which has a non-predictable amount of Fumaric acid (= unknown mix of mono- / di-valent ion pairs) and thus potency determination is not easy anymore.
So even though that is quite logical, I think there was never some data to look exactly into what happens if you compare both modes of mixing. It may be that a pretty fast addition will instantly precipitate 1x DMT + 1x Fumaric Acid = Mono-valent salt and thus create the 'unwanted ratio' in high quantities. Then afterwards this might not be able to react anymore with the remaining DMT in solution (like a 2-phase process) which is true for the CIELO TEK where you will only get Monomescaline Citrate instead of forming the theoretical maximum of 3x Mescaline + 1x Citric Acid over time. But still it does not necessarily be the same for all alkaloids, so maybe it might *collect* the remaining DMT in solution over time? Or maybe the crystal formation is rather slow and AFTER the fast addition but BEFORE actual crystal formation the reaction of all available carboxylic acid groups might still complete?
Here is an easy experiment to find out:
1,05 EQ DMT (1 mg / 10 ml Aceton) + 0,5 EQ Fumaric Acid (1 mg / 100 ml Aceton) is prepared.
Case 1: Normal FASA step = always excess DMTSlow addition of FASA into DMT-Acetone-Mix while stirringTo provoke formation of possible Mono-valent salt I went to the extreme and made
Case 2: Reverse FASA step = always excess Fumaric AcidSlow addition of DMT-Acetone-Mix into FASA while stirringNow just by optical judging the first case obviously looked normal, just very fine white powder, not crystals at all but just extreme fine powder. I think with "normal FASA Methods" you can only create true crystalline DMT-Fumarate when recrystallizing in Ethanol.
For case 2 it went different: When clouds started to vanish actual crystals formed. Interestingly they were even yellow and then some pretty white crystals grew on top, but was less than 10 % of total material for sure.
Now a NMR analysis was done and the ratio of the Di-Methyl-Peak was compared to the Fumaric Acid signal.
Case 1:= The Fumaric Acid Signal is at 0,64Case 2:
= The Fumaric Acid Signal is at 0,78The signal increase is roughly
22 %. In theory when comparing a Mono-Valent Salt (1:1) with a Di-Valent salt (1:2) the increase would be at a maximum of 100 %.
Sadly the absolute values retrieved here can not say anything about the actual salt formation, like giving a X:Y number between both. Reason is that only Protons (1H) will give a signal in 1H-NMR and therefore to not eclipse these signals with the obligate solvent it is mandatory to use deuterated solvents with Deuterium (2H). But protons that are highly interchangable can exchange with deterium from the solvent, if they are also interchangable. Both is true for sp2-C-H bonds = double bonds (still not to a high degree) and especially for water (which was used as a solvent here). So to indeed tell if Case 1 was mostly Di-valent salt and then Case 2 was *just 22 % off from the ideal state* I would need to repeat in another solvent, only DMSO would be possible for that.
Maybe will repeat in future, but anyways this shows that just from that raw data the difference is not too strong. But regarding the colour and morphology there is quite a difference, so staying cautious with a slow addition is obviously the best way.
But for people who overshot it, then there is probably no need to repeat the step, as this neutralization seems fast enough to still form mostly Di-valent ion pairs.