Er... Rather, I apologize if I came off in a confrontational manner. I see that it may seem that way, though that was not my intention. It seems we've bumped into this difficulty once before in this thread.
I quoted your post because of the clear way you illustrated many facets of your point of view at once, and it inspired me to add in a contrasting point of view along those same lines... I'll admit though, I do have a habit of speaking a bit more directly and forcefully than is often necessary.
If my comment was directed to any user in particular, it would be the OP. Perhaps I should have been more direct in stating that the opening post of this thread makes no sense; The article referenced does not seem to make any reference to psychedelics at all and merely contains the author's opinion on how their religion should be viewed and interpreted (while also citing no sources being painfully Euro-centric).
DisEmboDied wrote:According to this psychedelics for the most part make all people pagans.
Since this article doesn't mention psychedelics at all, I'm left to assume that the OP is merely proposing that the changes in consciousness which often accompany and follow the psychedelic experience seem to satisfy this article's author's criteria of what defines a pagan in their own opinion.
We certainly can only truly speak from our own experience; Just as we individually couldn't speak for "every pagan" or "every christian".. The article quoted in the opening post of this thread seems not to take this into consideration, as perhaps the OP failed to note when reading? "Neo-Pagans" such as the Wiccan group which published this article often seem to neglect this same principle as well...
I think the real issue at hand here is that we're all neglecting the fact that we've been trolled. The OP posted an off-topic article, made an unfounded and controversial statement, and then prompted us to discuss this arbitrary proposition... Which we did.