If I understand you correctly, you're referring to the
noosphere?Quote:Teilhard perceived a directionality in evolution along an axis of increasing Complexity/Consciousness. For Teilhard, the noosphere is the sphere of thought encircling the earth that has emerged through evolution as a consequence of this growth in complexity / consciousness. The noosphere is therefore as much part of nature as the barysphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere. As a result, Teilhard sees the "social phenomenon [as] the culmination of and not the attenuation of the biological phenomenon."[9] These social phenomena are part of the noosphere and include, for example, legal, educational, religious, research, industrial and technological systems. In this sense, the noosphere emerges through and is constituted by the interaction of human minds. The noosphere thus grows in step with the organization of the human mass in relation to itself as it populates the earth.
IMO, this is precisely why it is incumbent on those with the loudest voices to speak with the utmost care, because as we are seeing on a daily basis right now, the dumbest slogan or tweet can rapidly evolve from a 'mere' thought-form into concrete reality. No magick necessary.
Regarding deities, I'm sure this is also their likely source, but as to which came first, the deity or the worshipper, that's quite a tough one... But it does lead to the question, does a deity which nobody worships continue to exist, or rather,
exert power over the living?
TheAwakening wrote:A question I'd add to this discussion is what happens to an egregore if two groups interact with it with vastly different actions/emotions/intentions behind it.
I'd imagine one group 'sustain in their minds' a vision of a loving, compassionate deity, and are guided in their actions accordingly, while the other do the same for a wrathful, vengeful aspect of the same deity, which informs their actions too. IMO, polytheism - which typically allows for multiple aspects of the same god - handles this dualistic tension (between say, a creator and a destroyer, both of which are ultimately necessary in a balanced system) better than monotheism, where 'evil' tends to be outsourced to a single, rogue 'anti-god' figure. Or Demiurge, as the Gnostics would say.
This story (the fight between the white wolf and the black) is very well-known, at least in its incomplete version, but the full version
here makes much more sense.
But if you ask me, one of the most widely-accepted and egregious egregores of all, is fiat-money. Human society is contorted by its effects, and the endless pursuit of it enslaves billions, and destroys the biosphere, but outside of human thought, it is what, exactly?
“I sometimes marvel at how far I’ve come - blissful, even, in the knowledge that I am slowly becoming a well-evolved human being - only to have the illusion shattered by an episode of bad behaviour that contradicts the new and reinforces the old. At these junctures of self-reflection, I ask the question: “are all my years of hard work unraveling before my eyes, or am I just having an episode?” For the sake of personal growth and the pursuit of equanimity, I choose the latter and accept that, on this journey of evolution, I may not encounter just one bad day, but a group of many.”
― B.G. Bowers
ॐ