CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Is it a coïncidence that so many NMDA-antagonists are also acetylcholinesterase inhibitors? Options
 
dragonrider
#1 Posted : 10/19/2017 9:12:23 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 3090
Joined: 09-Jul-2016
Last visit: 03-Feb-2024
Well...is it?
 

STS is a community for people interested in growing, preserving and researching botanical species, particularly those with remarkable therapeutic and/or psychoactive properties.
 
downwardsfromzero
#2 Posted : 10/20/2017 12:43:23 AM

Boundary condition

ModeratorChemical expert

Posts: 8617
Joined: 30-Aug-2008
Last visit: 07-Nov-2024
Location: square root of minus one
It would be great if you could pad out this question with a few examples.

Then I might feel inspired to examine the differences between ACE inhibitors that are or are not NMDA antagonists Wink




“There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
dragonrider
#3 Posted : 10/20/2017 2:11:06 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 3090
Joined: 09-Jul-2016
Last visit: 03-Feb-2024
Well, the first that come to mind are ibogaïne it's analogues, galantamine, huperzine and agmatine.
 
triptonaut34
#4 Posted : 10/24/2017 3:55:49 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 17
Joined: 24-Oct-2015
Last visit: 18-Mar-2019
Interesting... my first thought was "well, what about ketamine?" But a quick google search reveals that ket is in fact an M1 blocker, and I'd guess that other disassociates share this property. Might explain the psychosis and mania some experience from these compounds.
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.025 seconds.