Im uploading to this post a table with the LSD blotters that have been tested in the last year by EC. Hope it is of help.. It is in spanish but I think it's pretty self explanatory. Feel free to ask any questions.

(PS: You need to be logged in to the Nexus to see the images)

could it be the use of b.glycol as solvent for laying purpose?
a rare occurrence for it being a byproduct from its synth.

Apparently it's an ingredient used in the ink, rather than a solvent used for laying the tabs or an antioxidant to prevent degradation.

Thanks for posting these btw end, the results usually disappear from the Energy Control site after a few weeks so it's nice to have a back up.

Oh dang. Those variation in strenght. 40ug all the way up to 400ug.
That would even catch a stable psychonaut off guard.

Lol, the test statistics we had here in central europe showed that 40ug was certainly much much more common than 400ug...But still...

The main problem with LSD is IMHO really, that you have no idea how much is on the blotter. So testing is the only way.

Thank you for taking the time to share this information end!

I'm logged in but all I see is little black X's.

Pics working for me.

Those French flag mushroom ones; 40, 104, 370! How come the 1p and eth-lad weren't quantitized? At least they were truthfully labelled and not misrepresented like the NBOMe's. Good to have this sort of analysis available. Cheers endlessness.

Wow, that 370 is impressive! Sounds like someone did a little math mess up laying that one! Hope you aren't used to taking 4 hits and get ahold of that stuff, you'd be in for quite the surprise.

Why would someone want to produce blotters with just 8 ug of LSD on it? You might as well sell blotters with nothing on it. Why be only half a cheat? It's like stealing somebody's wallet, and then secretly putting back some change in the guys pocket.

However, the tests do confirm that the ratio between LSD and iso-LSD varies a lot between different batches of LSD. Benzyme once suggested that this could help explain why some people belief (based on subjective experience) that there is good as well as bad acid.

Lowest value listed is 38 μg. That would definitely be noticeable for most people without a tolerance.

On the first picture there is one listed, with just 8 micrograms on it.

What the fuck is LDS?

Attitude page

LDS?

LDS?

EDIT: yes, clearly it's a typo.

It's a mispelling, its LSD.

My bad for the language, I was high when I posted that.



The blotter was probably low grade from the begging but doesn't necessarily have to be that either. It might have degraded further from improper storage. LSD is a very sensitive molecule, and who know where and how long this has been kept in the heat, light and outside on the open air.

Found it, don't know how I missed it after reading through the list about 5 times!

Could have been badly laid blotter, with hot spots and cold spots. Maybe that corner was poking out of the solution! Also it would (maybe) show up as positive for LSD with qualitative testing. This would be a way of stretching an amount of LSD - a cheap and stingy way, indeed - if one was selling to a group where testing was commonplace.

I'd go with AUN, that it was probably badly degraded as well as poorly made. There'd have to be studies on LSD degradation products for that to be said with any certainty, though.

maybe it was designed for microdosing?

8ug is pretty stimulating, almost too perceptible to consider as a microdose

That's a positive way of looking at it, thank you!