CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
PREV1234NEXT
why don't europeans want any actual power? Options
 
dragonrider
#21 Posted : 9/13/2016 4:49:49 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 3090
Joined: 09-Jul-2016
Last visit: 03-Feb-2024
hug46 wrote:
dragonrider wrote:

That's the one thing that has been completely left out of all of the debates considering the brexit referendum even: that europe's position in the world is currently a very weak one, and that by weakening it evenfurther, all of europe is going to be affected by that.


I don't know what debates you were watching but the weakening of both Britain and the EU following a brexit was fairly high up on the agendas of the remain camp and was definitely brought up. A lot.

Well, then apparently, the british voter did not care.

So, i've been attacked by some people for bringing it up. And ridiculed. But here you state that the topic actually HAS been brought up. So my question could easily be rephrased into the question question wich is completely legitimate to ask..why don't they care?

I mean...the future president of the united states has said for instance, that he would not rule out the use of nukes against europe.
And that's supposed to be europe's great friend and ally.
Why would you want to be in the position to be bullied around like that, by what's supposed to be your greatest friend and ally?

You think that isn't a legitimate question? Or a ridicule thing to ask?
Why?
Are europeans less important?

I'm a european, and i don't like the notion that i'm a second grade world citizen, just because i'm born here.
Should i be fine with it, that the future president of the USA threatens to maybe nuke me if it suits him?
I bet, that if the French president would say such a thing about america, most americans would not so easily shrug that off.
 

Live plants. Sustainable, ethically sourced, native American owned.
 
Nathanial.Dread
#22 Posted : 9/13/2016 5:24:46 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 2151
Joined: 23-Nov-2012
Last visit: 07-Mar-2017
dragonrider wrote:
the future president of the united states has said for instance, that he would not rule out the use of nukes against europe.

Let's say a 'potential' future president. Trump's victory is far from guaranteed. I believe his odds of victory are currently ranked at below 20%

I think Europeans are probably less important to Americans, because, to Americans, EVERYTHING is less important than Americans (I'm generalizing here, but if you look at our mainstream culture, you know what I'm talking about).

I'm not European, so I can't speak for any of them, let alone all of them, but my understanding of EU international relations is that, after the 1st and 2nd world wars, as well as the collapse of colonialism, there's a sense that maybe there are things worth investing in rather than endless accumulation of military power. Wasn't that the impetus for the EU?

The US has never been on the receiving end of a major war, so we don't have any really compelling reason to stop masturbating our throbbing war boners.

Blessings
~ND
"There are many paths up the same mountain."

 
hug46
#23 Posted : 9/13/2016 5:44:48 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 1856
Joined: 07-Sep-2012
Last visit: 12-Jan-2022
dragonrider wrote:

Well, then apparently, the british voter did not care.

So, i've been attacked by some people for bringing it up. And ridiculed. But here you state that the topic actually HAS been brought up. So my question could easily be rephrased into the question question wich is completely legitimate to ask..why don't they care?


As it was pretty much a 50/50 split on the vote i would say that half of the British voters did care and it is not that the other half do not care. It's just that they had been convinced otherwise by various campaigners and media institutions.

Quote:
I mean...the future president of the united states has said for instance, that he would not rule out the use of nukes against europe.
And that's supposed to be europe's great friend and ally.
Why would you want to be in the position to be bullied around like that, by what's supposed to be your greatest friend and ally?


Probably because a lot of Europeans don't take the potential future leader of America very seriously. Which is just as frightening as the prospect that he may become president.

Whereabouts in Europe are you from?

 
Ufostrahlen
#24 Posted : 9/13/2016 6:37:10 PM

xͭ͆͝͏̮͔̜t̟̬̦̣̟͉͈̞̝ͣͫ͞,̡̼̭̘̙̜ͧ̆̀̔ͮ́ͯͯt̢̘̬͓͕̬́ͪ̽́s̢̜̠̬̘͖̠͕ͫ͗̾͋͒̃͛̚͞ͅ


Posts: 1716
Joined: 23-Apr-2012
Last visit: 23-Jan-2017
dragonrider wrote:
Should i be fine with it, that the future president of the USA threatens to maybe nuke me if it suits him?

Don't take it personal and have a laugh, people are already signing petitions to nuke the US.

Internet Security: PsilocybeChild's Internet Security Walk-Through(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
Search the Nexus with disconnect.me (anonymous Google search) by adding "site:dmt-nexus.me" (w/o the ") to your search.
 
Psychelectric
#25 Posted : 9/13/2016 6:47:50 PM

Curiouser and curiouser


Posts: 364
Joined: 30-Aug-2012
Last visit: 03-Jan-2024
Location: The Dreams of God
You do realize that Europe is made up of multiple countries right?
And what is actual power, the ability to convince 18 year olds to die for oil contracts?

Also there was a time in European history when a country in Europe did vie for European power, history refers to that era as Nazi Germany.

What kind of power are you talking about? The ability to enslave and manipulate economies of other nations using military force to perpetuate a cycle of blind consumerism. Its not exactly a sane culture. The US doesn't have power, it's in the throughs of a violent cultural disorder and the violence doesn't make it "powerful" it makes it insane.
"Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Here’s Tom with the weather."
 
Psychelectric
#26 Posted : 9/13/2016 6:59:34 PM

Curiouser and curiouser


Posts: 364
Joined: 30-Aug-2012
Last visit: 03-Jan-2024
Location: The Dreams of God
What I'm trying to say is that is not the kind of "power" any country should want.
"Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Here’s Tom with the weather."
 
Ulim
#27 Posted : 9/13/2016 7:19:06 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 1023
Joined: 19-Mar-2016
Last visit: 07-Apr-2024
dragonrider wrote:
Isn't it weird that europeans generally don't seem to want europe to be powerfull?


Thats because europe is a group of states. Not a confederation.

Just take germany for example germany is a "Bundesrepublik" meaning its a group of countries bound together. Many people will say they are german. Only some will say otherwise, for example they will say they are bavarian or saxons.

In germany the countries sacrificed their sovereignty to form a country.

In europe the different states dont loose much sovereignty at all.
People still live in their country by the rules of their country.
Europe is nothing more than a treaty "to be nicer to eachother"
Europe is even less of a country than sealand is.
Because of that the leader of each nation do their own thing. They look for power (if they even do) only for themselves.

Europe is actually really powerfull. You forget something there. They dont need to stride for more power. They got more than enough. Russia, the USA and China cant force Europe to do anything. Many old USSR search protection from russia by joining the EU. And once they are in there is nothing russia can do.

Also dont forget that europe was meant for peace. WWI and WWII were never on american ground. Many people in the USA belive that america did everything in the war. They did hide for a long time and suffered the least losses.
America lost less than a 100 civilians during WWII and less than 1/30 of all soldiers.
Refer to fallen.io

Search for power creates hatred. Hatred creates war. Just look what america did in the middle east.
Russia did the same many times over too.
 
Praxis.
#28 Posted : 9/13/2016 7:22:45 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Senior Member

Posts: 682
Joined: 30-Dec-2012
Last visit: 16-Jun-2024
Location: The Twilight Zone
Quote:
I'm a european, and i don't like the notion that i'm a second grade world citizen, just because i'm born here


Wut?
"Consciousness grows in spirals." --George L. Jackson

If you can just get your mind together, then come across to me. We'll hold hands and then we'll watch the sunrise from the bottom of the sea...
But first, are you experienced?
 
hug46
#29 Posted : 9/13/2016 7:36:55 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 1856
Joined: 07-Sep-2012
Last visit: 12-Jan-2022
Psychelectric wrote:

Also there was a time in European history when a country in Europe did vie for European power, history refers to that era as Nazi Germany.


Add to that the british empire, various incarnations of greek and roman empires, french colonial empire, portugese empire, spanish empire, celtic empire and probably quite a few more that i havent thought of.
 
Studio1one
#30 Posted : 9/13/2016 7:38:08 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 131
Joined: 07-Dec-2014
Last visit: 12-Oct-2017
Location: UK
dragonrider wrote:


I'm a european, and i don't like the notion that i'm a second grade world citizen, just because i'm born here.



Quote:

Darkness cannot banish darkness, only light can do that

Hate cannot banish hate, only love can do that.
 
universecannon
#31 Posted : 9/13/2016 7:57:40 PM



Moderator | Skills: harmalas, melatonin, trip advice, lucid dreaming

Posts: 5257
Joined: 29-Jul-2009
Last visit: 24-Aug-2024
Location: 🌊
So what should Europe do to get more "power", in your opinion OP? Build up their arsenal?

Your only a "second class world citizen" because you define yourself as one.



<Ringworm>hehehe, it's all fun and games till someone loses an "I"
 
pitubo
#32 Posted : 9/13/2016 8:01:59 PM

dysfunctional word machine

Senior Member

Posts: 1831
Joined: 15-Mar-2014
Last visit: 11-Jun-2018
Location: at the center of my universe
First world problems...
pitubo attached the following image(s):
problems.jpg (90kb) downloaded 114 time(s).
 
pitubo
#33 Posted : 9/13/2016 8:09:11 PM

dysfunctional word machine

Senior Member

Posts: 1831
Joined: 15-Mar-2014
Last visit: 11-Jun-2018
Location: at the center of my universe
universecannon wrote:
So what should Europe do to get more "power"

This would only empower a select group of people, none of whom represents 99.99 of the population of Europe. Ultimately, this power would be used against the population of Europe, too.

The whole notion of "Europe" needing power is complete bullshit. The same with "American" power: most of the population of the USA does not benefit from the raging imperialism. Just ask war veterans.
 
Ufostrahlen
#34 Posted : 9/13/2016 8:50:06 PM

xͭ͆͝͏̮͔̜t̟̬̦̣̟͉͈̞̝ͣͫ͞,̡̼̭̘̙̜ͧ̆̀̔ͮ́ͯͯt̢̘̬͓͕̬́ͪ̽́s̢̜̠̬̘͖̠͕ͫ͗̾͋͒̃͛̚͞ͅ


Posts: 1716
Joined: 23-Apr-2012
Last visit: 23-Jan-2017
Ulim wrote:
People still live in their country by the rules of their country.

Not really, because EU law overrules national law. RCs are an example: EU court says RCs are intoxifying chemicals not medicinal drugs, so Germany can't apply its medicinal drug laws to RCs like it used to do.

Quote:
I'm not European, so I can't speak for any of them, let alone all of them, but my understanding of EU international relations is that, after the 1st and 2nd world wars, as well as the collapse of colonialism, there's a sense that maybe there are things worth investing in rather than endless accumulation of military power. Wasn't that the impetus for the EU?


Yes.

Quote:
Apart from the ideas of federation, confederation, or customs union, the original development of the European Union was based on a supranational foundation that would "make war unthinkable and materially impossible"[1][2] and reinforce democracy amongst its members[3] as laid out by Robert Schuman and other leaders in the Schuman Declaration (1950) and the Europe Declaration (1951).


https://en.wikipedia.org...ry_of_the_European_Union


The main threats to the EU are right-wing nationalists and undemocratic structures, not US politicians. Let's hope that citizens worldwide get rid of the nationalist scum. They are the evil forces against peace, prosperity and a World Union.

Quote:
The whole notion of "Europe" needing power is complete bullshit. The same with "American" power: most of the population of the USA does not benefit from the raging imperialism. Just ask war veterans.

Exactly. Some people are born to be cannon fodder.


Internet Security: PsilocybeChild's Internet Security Walk-Through(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
Search the Nexus with disconnect.me (anonymous Google search) by adding "site:dmt-nexus.me" (w/o the ") to your search.
 
Ulim
#35 Posted : 9/13/2016 8:56:46 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 1023
Joined: 19-Mar-2016
Last visit: 07-Apr-2024
Ufostrahlen wrote:
Ulim wrote:
People still live in their country by the rules of their country.

Not really, because EU law overrules national law. RCs are an example: EU court says RCs are intoxifying chemicals not medicinal drugs, so Germany can't apply its medicinal drug laws to RCs like it used to do.



ye but i took 1 year in school to get through everything about the eu so im keeping it short.
 
dragonrider
#36 Posted : 9/13/2016 9:48:11 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 3090
Joined: 09-Jul-2016
Last visit: 03-Feb-2024
ijahdan wrote:
pitubo wrote:


Insecure people seek psychological shelter in externally approved identities, but these are only provided for the purpose of being used against them, so they can be pitted against each other.



True, it's easy to get sucked in by these cultural identities. I try not to see myself as 'British' or 'European', but sometimes slip into that mindset, mainly when comparing 'us' with some other group of people, such as in this very thread.

The old 'divide and rule', it's been working for centuries.

If that is true, we're living in a dangerous world, where political instability could easily lead to the rise of dangerous forms of nationalism. Or maybe even imperialism.

If i where living in such a world, i think i would want to be protected by a powerfull military, so that no imperialist leader elsewhere would ever get the idea of invading or nuking my country.

Especially, when these dangerous forms of group thinking, of nationalism, xenophobia and imperialism would be quite common and therefore, a very real threat.
 
pitubo
#37 Posted : 9/13/2016 10:05:38 PM

dysfunctional word machine

Senior Member

Posts: 1831
Joined: 15-Mar-2014
Last visit: 11-Jun-2018
Location: at the center of my universe
I don't really know what to say to this anymore. Maybe a funny video will do.

"Le dictateur arrive"
 
universecannon
#38 Posted : 9/14/2016 1:18:54 AM



Moderator | Skills: harmalas, melatonin, trip advice, lucid dreaming

Posts: 5257
Joined: 29-Jul-2009
Last visit: 24-Aug-2024
Location: 🌊
A group of leading scientists has produced a video outlining this very topic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE



<Ringworm>hehehe, it's all fun and games till someone loses an "I"
 
TimePantry
#39 Posted : 9/14/2016 1:50:45 AM

It's a field.


Posts: 230
Joined: 26-Jun-2011
Last visit: 29-Oct-2019
Well, I live in California, so I'm just guessing and possibly projecting, but..

If I saw a swaggering bully who stomps around with a lot of ill informed, sanctimonious judgement and hypocritical posturing; and that bully wanted not just to have the biggest piece of cake, but also to internationally outlaw anyone else having any cake at all; and that bully wanted to gamble with me, but ONLY if he could have all of the benefits but take none of the risks; and that bully had a big nasty stick that he whacked everybody with if they even looked at him funny -- why would I want to be like that bully at all?

I wouldn't want to play baseball with someone who insisted you count only their runs, and none of their outs, while yours counted double.

And I sure the hell wouldn't want to be like the kind of people who come up with things like corporate personhood, and the twisted insistence on being able to sue a nation whose people choose to ban your literally poisonous products --- for "lost profits."

(I blame the puritans)
"What's wrong with that generation? ... Is this what comes of putting on Pink Floyd laser lightshows down at the Planetarium?" --Spider Robinson
 
dragonrider
#40 Posted : 9/14/2016 12:50:06 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 3090
Joined: 09-Jul-2016
Last visit: 03-Feb-2024
pitubo wrote:
First world problems...

Well, funny. But the future president of the united states has, out of the blue, and for no reason but his own amusement, threatened to kill me amd everyone i know and love, and to burn all of my world down to the ground. Because that's what nukes do.
And just because elsewhere there are people who don't have enough to eat, i should be happy to be bullied around like that?

If you think that being bullied around like that is not such a bad thing, that it's something a person shouldn't complain about, why don't we trade places then? You give me your nukes, and i make the jokes about using them against you.
I mean, if you think that being in such a position is not realy worth complaining...
 
PREV1234NEXT
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest (10)

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.064 seconds.