I'm off on another camping trip.
I only want to pull a little on the thread of "dysphoria." I'd like to not just throw it out and push on to others the dysphoric aspects of KOR expression in general and Salvia Div. in particular.
I get it, I think, that Twig is hip to that aspect of Salvia. What if, simply, euphoria-dysphoria is one unrepresentable and subtle whole whose poles are euphoria and dysphoria. They both have their richness.
We simply get to something of the paradox of our experience, of the body/brain/mind, and of Salvia.
Our models of the brain for example are too discrete/disjointed/partial and not global enough if we do not see the one whole of it. For example the olfactory sense is both a direct route to the deepest "glandular" layers of brain/body and a highest most flexible sense that requires intercommunication with the most nimble and highest cortical layers, simultaneously.
The triune brain, for example, is already off the table as it equated the emotional only with the "limbic" and not limbic-cortical which it is proving to be. And intellectual tasks also have limbic components. The triune brain is a limited model that is partially helpful but when the authors of A General Theory of Love cut the limbic off from the higher brain as they do in the intro to that book, they have already failed.
"Physics Envy" led me to a very lucid article by Noam Chomsky
http://www.trulysuperb.c...l-of-Philosophy-2009.pdfTruly worth a read. Basically, our models are not there yet, and the substrate "neurology" will surely be revised again and again. He likens it to Newtonian research in physics that could not yet explain chemistry. The substrate had to be rethought again and again to get to a coherent description of chemical interaction. Spooky "action at a distance" had to be tolerated and studied as a fact first. Before the physics could get to post-Newtonian physics.
What is here now is our direct experience. That and our intuitions, combined with local theories and local research that does not necessarily cohere into a model that works as explanation.
We have to stay open, and forgo the easy explanation that would stop research and satisfy itself with a model only. We have to do this if we want to be honest and direct.
The one whole of the brain, simultaneously both higher and lower, and not even isolated from the body and the environment has to be tolerated as a fact, however paradoxical. Science itself demands it.
And we as living beings also, I'd say, demand it.
Here is some post triune brain work on emotions and the brain:
http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~knutson/ans/ledoux00.pdf
In the case of Salvia, local research on KOR expression, endogenous opioids, brain lateralization and emotions and novelty is, I think, really important.
Also, I think, to summarize, that the research points to something beyond a "trauma" model to a capacity to contain "trauma" model. "Trauma" could be another name for extreme novelty. Something of the capacity to handle the traumatic impacts of life is built up in one person and not another? Study on KOR expression and study on lateralization points to that capacity as something that can be developed.
Can Salvia help grow those "trust" networks? I think so.