Obsessions and alike, is this different than entities acting on a person? Perhaps it is same thing, only in entities they become recognized as such. We could see entities active in the real matter world by their products. If you get overwhelmed by anger, why differ that from a particular entity striking you (riding you) that way? Entities are energy, is transformable, as are psychological/emotional or sick states, to me it seems strongly suggesting that they are same.
Possession, exorcism, hypnoses, etc, becomes more palpable if looked at them as entities-alike strategies. Often I feel like the sum of a set of entities and nothing more, energies who ride me, and in "healing" or personal development it looks like just a matter of tuning which one's you allow or kickass out, to the extent possible.
If looked at entities as representations of energy-type, then they exist in both hyperspace and real matter world, with only a difference in manifestation or perceptibility.
I could be wrong but the simplicity behind it is so seducing. It would bring value to spice if it enabled energies to be visualized/conceptualized that are in common world totally invisible (except for the results when they have already acted).
"Your Honor, It wasn't actually me who did the crime, it was that other piece in myself that made me do it."With some doctor report backup such defense is tenable in courts. One could say entities are officially recognized
* * *
PS: I admit not having enough entity experience to speak of in the way others report, but I do meet energy-fields that I need to steer during ceremony, some I welcome, some I feel to stray from. The fields affect my feelings. Some fields are novel and I feel introduced to, which I do with prudence. So I only put a hypothesis about "entities".