Orion wrote:I wouldn't recommend dipping anyway. Sheets don't dry at exactly the same time for every square. As each tab dries, the other wetter ones wick up more of the dissolved compound, which can result in some weak blots and some very strong ones. A micro pipette is a much safer way to do it.
I am experimenting with micropipette but with mixed results.
So far I tried only 300 lb watercolor paper, not a real blotter (though the material is similar to real blotter paper I purchased, if not the same).
The problem is that even at 20 microliters the resulting spot covers several tabs around.
At 100 microliters, the spot is pretty big, several centimeters across.
Of course, I can ignore this and just continue dropping on center of each tab separately, leaving the spots to overlay and hoping the LSD concentration will even out. The tip of the pipette actually touches the paper to promote soaking the liquid in it, as dropping liquid on paper might be inaccurate.
Corners are troublesome as the liquid can travel only towards center of the paper, thus ineviteably creating hot spots in the corners.
I will try to use some dye with suitable solvent for lysergide tartrate (70% ethanol ?). Hopefully the dye will show hot spots and it would be possible to optimize the laying strategy.
For the pipetting experiment, I have used 95% ethanol so maybe it would behave more neatly with some water in it (less mobile and more compact liquid).