CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Cosmic perspective - Neil deGrasse Tyson Options
 
Kazoo...
#1 Posted : 11/29/2011 3:27:25 AM

ओं मणिपद्मे हूं


Posts: 215
Joined: 02-Jan-2010
Last visit: 28-Apr-2016
Location: embracing infinity
I found this inspiring...

2006 Neil deGrasse Tyson closes the three day lecture series with an excellent final "sermon" on cosmic perspective and the impact of science.

Watch the vid - http://youtu.be/6RjW5-4IiSc - Do it!!!!

Be a participant in the universe.....
Sometimes the lights all shining on me, other times I can barely see....
 

Live plants. Sustainable, ethically sourced, native American owned.
 
PrimateSphinx
#2 Posted : 12/1/2011 9:04:27 PM

The Rhythmic Dúnedain


Posts: 293
Joined: 07-Jul-2011
Last visit: 07-Jul-2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Gotta love Neil deGrasse TysonSmile. Just another reason why he is cooler than all of us
What are we but stupefied dancers to a discordant stystem, we believe - so we're mislead
we assume - so we're played
we confide - so we're deceived
we trust - so we're betrayed


 
onethousandk
#3 Posted : 12/2/2011 3:55:59 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 278
Joined: 30-May-2011
Last visit: 11-Mar-2017
Location: Here & Now
I mostly love Neil deGrasse Tyson. I have heard him say some fairly materialist things before though, like how neuroscience will make psychology irrelevant, which I don't quite agree with. Still a brilliant man though. Certainly better at math than I am. Razz
 
Citta
#4 Posted : 12/5/2011 6:19:45 PM

Skepdick


Posts: 768
Joined: 20-Oct-2009
Last visit: 26-Mar-2018
Location: Norway
onethousandk wrote:
...like how neuroscience will make psychology irrelevant, which I don't quite agree with. Still a brilliant man though.


Why do you disagree? =)
 
onethousandk
#5 Posted : 12/20/2011 5:24:53 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 278
Joined: 30-May-2011
Last visit: 11-Mar-2017
Location: Here & Now
Citta wrote:
onethousandk wrote:
...like how neuroscience will make psychology irrelevant, which I don't quite agree with. Still a brilliant man though.


Why do you disagree? =)


It seems a bit too reductionist. Bertrand Russell once said that philosophers help scientists figure out where they're going. They allow the speculation that science eventually either proves right or wrong. (He did say that modern science makes the philosopher less relevant, though my argument would be that philosophers aren't working hard enough!) To me this is the relationship between neuroscience and psychology. Saying neuroscience will eventually make psychology irrelevant is like saying that we'll be able to reduce love to a series of chemical reactions. I don't think this to be true. It will always be a chase and psychology will only become irrelevant when they can't out think the neuroscientists.
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest (2)

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.023 seconds.