Forgive me if I'm a little fuzzy on the theory involved, but...
Do I understand the article to say that these antiprotons are not extant from the Big Bang, but rather were produced much more recently as a result of cosmic ray bombardment? So they're not part of the "missing" antimatter. (the antimatter that according to theory would have been produced in roughly equal proportion to regular matter during the big bang.)
All the same, could such aggregation of antimatter, on a larger scale perhaps but for similar reasons, account for the large quantity of antimatter we haven't been able to find? (i.e., maybe it's all in big clumps out somewhere past scanner range, as it were.)
"What's wrong with that generation? ... Is this what comes of putting on Pink Floyd laser lightshows down at the Planetarium?" --Spider Robinson