CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Water filters through mhrb slower than IPA? Options
 
Trickster
#1 Posted : 5/4/2010 9:43:22 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Chemical expert

Posts: 764
Joined: 18-Jan-2008
Last visit: 20-Mar-2023
SWIM is into her CSLE (Continuous Solid-Liquid Extractor) extraction using acidified water instead of IPA.

Immediately she noticed that water flows through the extractor column filled with 50 g of mhrb MUCH slower than IPA. She added a few grams of perlite as a result doubling total volume of the extracted material but the flow-through speed did not increase very much.

Same prepowdred mhrb was used.

Is this normal/expected? Is it because of greater surface tension of water?
Do not seek the truth, just drop your opinions.
 

Explore our global analysis service for precise testing of your extracts and other substances.
 
d*l*b
#2 Posted : 5/5/2010 12:40:33 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 1303
Joined: 12-Nov-2008
Last visit: 11-Sep-2024
Location: ...
I am guessing that as water is more dense than IPA so it should flow slightly slower...
D × V × F > R
 
Trickster
#3 Posted : 5/7/2010 10:03:39 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Chemical expert

Posts: 764
Joined: 18-Jan-2008
Last visit: 20-Mar-2023
d*l*b wrote:
I am guessing that as water is more dense than IPA so it should flow slightly slower...


Adding perlite helped a lot.

But still, in swim's experience, IPA extraction is 3-5 times faster than acidified water extraction. Now she is into 11-th hour and the water dripping from the extractor is still purplish. IPA would have been completely clear after the second hour.
Do not seek the truth, just drop your opinions.
 
benzyme
#4 Posted : 5/8/2010 12:25:50 AM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 03-Mar-2024
Location: the lab
Trickster wrote:
Is it because of greater surface tension of water?


probably has more to do with h-bonding with cellulose hydroxyl groups.
dioxane has a stronger dipole moment, propan-2-ol has van der wahls interactions because of its isopropyl moeity.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.066 seconds.