DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 1 Joined: 05-Sep-2021 Last visit: 06-Sep-2021 Location: Georgia
|
Hey guys , first time posting here.
I have done couple of very successful extractions using cybs salt method.
I am planning for 200g mhrb project and i wanna extract it all preferably by not using four seperate bottles and etc and doing it in one go.
Any tips on teks which i can use? Any help will be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
 
Posts: 4160 Joined: 01-Oct-2016 Last visit: 15-Dec-2024
|
You can really use any tek you like, but when scaling up for the greater amount of starting material, you'll have to calculate through volume. Don't just multiply based on how much more bark you're starting with. Best of luck. One love What if the "truth" is: the "truth" is indescernible/unknowable/nonexistent? Then the closest we get is through being true to and with ourselves. Know thyself, nothing in excess, certainty brings insanity- Delphic Maxims DMT always has something new to show you  Question everything... including questioning everything... There's so much I could be wrong about and have no idea... All posts and supposed experiences are from an imaginary interdimensional being. This being has the proclivity and compulsion for delving in depths it shouldn't. Posts should be taken with a grain of salt. 👽
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 350 Joined: 21-Aug-2021 Last visit: 29-Jun-2023 Location: The Bible Belt
|
I'm just going to throw out there my experience using STB for extraction that 50g extractions provided optimal yields vs larger extractions.
My results were as follows
50g - 1g
100g - 1.5g
150g - 2g
300g - 2.25g
400g - 2.5g
These were after 4 pulls Naptha, 1ml per gram each pull. This is just my experience, I'm sure the difference could be made up through additional pulls and backsalting to reclaim spice below the 'freeze precipate saturation point'.
Not trying to deter you or change your mind. I've played around with this a bit and the smaller 50g extractions always go the best.
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 4160 Joined: 01-Oct-2016 Last visit: 15-Dec-2024
|
Dirty T wrote:I'm just going to throw out there my experience using STB for extraction that 50g extractions provided optimal yields vs larger extractions.
My results were as follows
50g - 1g
100g - 1.5g
150g - 2g
300g - 2.25g
400g - 2.5g
These were after 4 pulls Naptha, 1ml per gram each pull. This is just my experience, I'm sure the difference could be made up through additional pulls and backsalting to reclaim spice below the 'freeze precipate saturation point'.
Not trying to deter you or change your mind. I've played around with this a bit and the smaller 50g extractions always go the best. I second this ^^ One love What if the "truth" is: the "truth" is indescernible/unknowable/nonexistent? Then the closest we get is through being true to and with ourselves. Know thyself, nothing in excess, certainty brings insanity- Delphic Maxims DMT always has something new to show you Question everything... including questioning everything... There's so much I could be wrong about and have no idea... All posts and supposed experiences are from an imaginary interdimensional being. This being has the proclivity and compulsion for delving in depths it shouldn't. Posts should be taken with a grain of salt. 👽
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 3968 Joined: 21-Jul-2012 Last visit: 15-Feb-2024
|
I third it. I stick to 75g's MHRB. Nailed my little technique down and that seems to be the optimal amount as far as yield and quality. No need to rush thru it unless, well, there's a need to rush thru it for some reason, like Mom is coming home from vacation or something. (I meant your Mom, my Mom has been dead for years. I don't rush it.)  Sine experientia nihil sufficienter sciri potest -Roger Bacon
*γνῶθι σεαυτόν*
|
|
|
Boundary condition
Posts: 8617 Joined: 30-Aug-2008 Last visit: 07-Nov-2024 Location: square root of minus one
|
It's about the surface area to volume ratios. Larger amounts screw up the extraction efficiency because volume scales as the cube (third power) and surface area only as the square (second power). Larger volumes are also more tricky to handle, increasing the likelihood of mishaps. Keep it small. “There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work." ― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
|