CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Which depth is better? Options
 
Aoutiv
#1 Posted : 1/24/2010 8:48:47 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 57
Joined: 26-Jul-2009
Last visit: 17-Mar-2015
Location: Shpongland
Edit, added .5 to 2nd choice to even out numbers.

So i've been trying to find out which depth is better and have been getting mixed responses.

1.5 inch depth, 9 inch, by 10 inch.

OR

3 inch depth, 8 inch, by 5.5 inch?


Both have the same volume but much different surface area. One has 90 square inches, and one has 40 square inches.
It seems that 1.5, how it is shallow, would be a strong enough cake to hold some big boomers, and of course would have a better yield at first. It would colonize faster than the 3 inch depth, but it would not have as many flushes as the 3 inch depth would put out. So, technically, in theory they SHOULD harvest the same amount. So which one is better then. Some have said that cubes with sub that is less than 2.5 don't fruit as well, but does anyone know why this is? I don't know, interested in feed back.
โ€œI have realized that the past and future are real illusions, that they exist in the present, which is what there is and all there is.โ€
-Watts-

"We live together, we act on, and react to, one another; but always and in all circumstances we are by ourselves. The martyrs go hand in hand into the arena; they are crucified alone. Embraced, the lovers desperately try to fuse their insulated ecstasies into a single self-transcendence; in vain. By its very nature every embodied spirit is doomed to suffer and enjoy in solitude. Sensations, feelings, insights, fancies โ€” all these are private and, except through symbols and at second hand, incommunicable. We can pool information about experiences, but never the experiences themselves. From family to nation, every human group is a society of island universes."
-Huxley-
 

Explore our global analysis service for precise testing of your extracts and other substances.
 
Aoutiv
#2 Posted : 1/24/2010 8:55:27 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 57
Joined: 26-Jul-2009
Last visit: 17-Mar-2015
Location: Shpongland
So, someone just said that the lower depths do not produce mush as well as deeper and said it was somewhat of a mystery. Any info on this?
โ€œI have realized that the past and future are real illusions, that they exist in the present, which is what there is and all there is.โ€
-Watts-

"We live together, we act on, and react to, one another; but always and in all circumstances we are by ourselves. The martyrs go hand in hand into the arena; they are crucified alone. Embraced, the lovers desperately try to fuse their insulated ecstasies into a single self-transcendence; in vain. By its very nature every embodied spirit is doomed to suffer and enjoy in solitude. Sensations, feelings, insights, fancies โ€” all these are private and, except through symbols and at second hand, incommunicable. We can pool information about experiences, but never the experiences themselves. From family to nation, every human group is a society of island universes."
-Huxley-
 
Oncewas
#3 Posted : 1/25/2010 12:38:28 AM
DMT-Nexus member

Senior Member

Posts: 341
Joined: 15-Oct-2009
Last visit: 11-Oct-2012
The only advice I can really give on the matter is this. Deeper the sub the better the flushes in swims experience.

Also outdoor's need nice and thick sub(4-5inches). Bugs get hungry and worms get lost is the reason why that is recommended.

The science of it I am not certain.
 
psilyguy
#4 Posted : 1/25/2010 1:04:25 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 139
Joined: 10-Dec-2009
Last visit: 18-Sep-2016
Location: Canada
The shallower depths may release moisture from the substrate too quickly, especially for repeat flushes. I'm not positive, just a guess. 3" seems to be a good depth in trays, with 1/4"-1/2" of casing on top.
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.027 seconds.