https://www.dmt-nexus.me...aspx?g=posts&t=21527i found this post by endless, What isn't covered is what if its being used for non-drug purposes.
I was reading in a post about an individuals prosecution that he couldn't get it the drug charges dismissed even when he proposed that the BLM(might be a diff agency) uses Phalaris grass to stop errosion and they do so without a DEA permit. And also That the arguement of Wal-Mart and Home-Depot selling cactus with mescaline in it wasn't able to get the case dismissed either.
I would think neither of those circumstances applicable to his case because he was an individual who was caught with spent bark in the crockpot, obviously making DMT. We have no desire to make DMT and feel we should be protected on the same grounds that the wal-mart and home depot sell san pedro.
I am Shaman Shop cites the RC cases as there reason for no longer selling bark, but i think that was also different circumstances as those were analogous of illegal chemicals and were produced for consumption/study.
Again if were making soap, is there hope? just trying to wrap my head around the difference between suppliers and consumers, because i haven't found a single supplier who was tried all the way through. BBB is a state based civil drug tax stamp case which is way different and state dependent.