We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Inverted linguistics? Options
 
DeMolecularTraveler
#1 Posted : 5/11/2012 8:04:31 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 136
Joined: 04-Mar-2012
Last visit: 24-Apr-2022
Location: Theres nowhere to set my aim, so I'm everywhere
Something amazingly simple yet often overlooked occurred to me the other day while looking at my beautiful kitty.
We call it a cat, but we have no idea what it really is.
what the eff is that?
Just because we label something, that label does not, cannot define that something.
This can be applied to everything.
What if we stripped away labels from everything?
This is a very simple idea, but very profound also.
Then in my efforts to describe hyperspace and the indescribable, a thought came to me.
Would this everyday reality become hyperspace if we took away all the labels and utterly meaningless descriptions?
Is hyperspace simply the inversion of linguistics?
Anyways, just some thoughts I had and I thought I would share with you all.
Thoughts?
Much Love, Much RespectPleased
 

Good quality Syrian rue (Peganum harmala) for an incredible price!
 
tony
#2 Posted : 5/11/2012 8:19:56 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 486
Joined: 01-Nov-2011
Last visit: 07-Aug-2012
Location: 127.0.0.1
It's an interesting thought. I agree about labels being mostly just arbitrary and meaningless, but they are useful. Not really useful in defining the "thing" since really all "things" are just part of a massive cloud of energy... like in reality my table is not separate from my computer, they are both part of the same cloud of atoms which, when you get down to fundamentals, is just energy... but the labels are useful for communicating (for example so that when I order a computer from ebay I don't get a table through in the mail, lol). I don't think dropping the labels in communication would be particularly helpful to anything, but dropping them in your mind (or rather, being aware that they don't really mean anything) is probably a useful exercise.
-Я Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ Ø N-
 
DeMaTron
#3 Posted : 5/11/2012 11:00:08 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 79
Joined: 23-Mar-2012
Last visit: 31-Aug-2012
Location: East coast, US
Totally dude. Our language is a perpetuating description of reality that could be infinitely different based on what that description is. The truth is undefinable it seems; for if it were definable, it would simply be a particular interpretation.
 
Eliyahu
#4 Posted : 5/12/2012 1:04:05 AM
סנדלפון


Posts: 1322
Joined: 16-Apr-2012
Last visit: 05-Nov-2012
Location: מלכות
Hey there..

Please check out my thread called "learning to see".. it is relavant to your revelation
And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not percieve the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, "brother let me remove the speck from your eye", when you yourself do not see the plank that is in your own eye?-Yeshua ben Yoseph
 
Psyren
#5 Posted : 5/12/2012 2:14:04 AM

d(^_^)b


Posts: 202
Joined: 08-Jun-2011
Last visit: 04-Oct-2013
Location: Dark side of the Sun
Seek not abroad, turn back into thyself, for in the inner man dwells the truth.
 
MMPA
#6 Posted : 5/12/2012 5:33:01 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 166
Joined: 21-Feb-2011
Last visit: 26-May-2020
Dissecting reality can be so enlightening sometimes! Kudos.

The only difficulty if we shed all these labels is if we wanted to communicate to each other. Maybe we wouldn't need to at that point, we could just understand each other. Who knows?
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.021 seconds.