We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Ethanol extraction question for chemists Options
 
Mitakuye Oyasin
#1 Posted : 10/21/2022 1:15:42 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 992
Joined: 10-Dec-2010
Last visit: 24-Oct-2023
Location: Earth's atmosphere
I have a question about using high proof ethanol as a solvent and would love some feedback from those well versed in chemistry. Let's say someone uses high proof ethanol as a solvent for cannabis. Then sets up a simple heat distiller to reclaim most of the ethanol on one side and concentrate the cannabis extract goodies on the other side. Would the reclaimed ethanol still be OK to be used as a cannabis solvent on future extractions? As long as the proof of the reclaim remains high and not diluted with water will it still have the same power and strength as it did the first time with being able to dissolve and hold active cannabinoids? Can one keep using the same reclaimed ethanol time after time to extract cannabis goodies or will there be a point where it looses its strength? Besides water lowering the proof, are there any other factors that would weaken the ability for the reclaimed ethanol to extract cannabis actives?

An example scenario: 1000 ml of 195 proof ethanol is used to extract 2 ounces of cannabis. An ethanol reclaim distiller is set up and it is able to reclaim 920ml of 190 proof ethanol. Would this reclaimed ethanol still have all the solvent power as a fresh batch of ethanol with the same 190 proof or would there be falloff after multiple uses?

Thanks for any suggestions or guidance.
Let us declare nature to be legitimate. All plants should be declared legal, and all animals for that matter. The notion of illegal plants and animals is obnoxious and ridiculous.
— Terence McKenna


All my posts are hypothetical and for educational/entertainment purposes, and are not an endorsement of said activities. SWIM (a fictional character based on other people) either obtained a license for said activity, did said activity where it is legal to do so, or as in most cases the activity is completely fictional.
 

Live plants. Sustainable, ethically sourced, native American owned.
 
Hailstorm
#2 Posted : 10/21/2022 2:18:21 AM

DMT-Nexus member

Chemical expert

Posts: 267
Joined: 14-Dec-2018
Last visit: 14-Apr-2024
If you distill it out, and the boiling point is close to 78.2 °C, you can be fairly confident you have ~190 proof ethanol, which you can measure with a hydrometer. It will be as good as it gets, and you can always dry it (up to 200 proof) by letting it stand over 3Å molecular sieves.
 
downwardsfromzero
#3 Posted : 10/21/2022 2:24:37 AM

Boundary condition

ModeratorChemical expert

Posts: 8617
Joined: 30-Aug-2008
Last visit: 07-Nov-2024
Location: square root of minus one
Basically yes to all of that, although I'd advise using some kind of steam bath for heating so you don't scorch your extract by mistake. The ethanol will largely retain its proof strength - except anything over 96% ABV/192° proof will absorb moisture from the air to bring it down to that concentration fairly promptly anyhow. This partly depends on how dry the material is from which you'll be extracting - extract too many batches of damp weed and you'll see a drop in the ABV of your ethanol.

It's quite easy to dry ethanol though, but if you want to separate ethanol from excess water by distillation you'll need to have a reasonably good fractionation column such as a Vigreux or be prepared to do it incredibly slowly.

Ethanol pulls a lot of chlorophyll though, which will have a tendency to produce fusty gunk - this is more of a problem in a hot extraction. Presumably you're largely interested in the resinous trichomes, which you could just rinse off with acetone and thereby pull a little less chlorophyll. Acetone has the advantage of evaporating very easily along with correspondingly more of a flammability hazard.

The main question is, perhaps, what distillation equipment, and what experience, do you actually have?




“There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
Mitakuye Oyasin
#4 Posted : 10/22/2022 4:41:31 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 992
Joined: 10-Dec-2010
Last visit: 24-Oct-2023
Location: Earth's atmosphere
Thanks for the replies.
Let us declare nature to be legitimate. All plants should be declared legal, and all animals for that matter. The notion of illegal plants and animals is obnoxious and ridiculous.
— Terence McKenna


All my posts are hypothetical and for educational/entertainment purposes, and are not an endorsement of said activities. SWIM (a fictional character based on other people) either obtained a license for said activity, did said activity where it is legal to do so, or as in most cases the activity is completely fictional.
 
Mitakuye Oyasin
#5 Posted : 12/1/2022 2:54:58 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 992
Joined: 10-Dec-2010
Last visit: 24-Oct-2023
Location: Earth's atmosphere
My buddy informs me that using a simple glass distillation rig with a double boiler they were able to get back approx 94% of the 196 proof ethanol they used to extract goodies from Cannabis. They think they got around 190-195 proof reclaimed ethanol back using a Hydrometer. They only tested 2 bottles out of about 20 bottles, but on average they don't think any are less than 190 proof. A total of 20 x 750 ml bottles of 196 proof ethanol was used and 19 and roughly 2/3 bottles was reclaimed. If this reclaimed ethanol has the same extracting power as it did before, that is a huge win-win for Cannabis extraction. Ethanol ain't cheap. The reclaim smells the same, but does have a significant planty taste to it as most likely lots of Chlorophyll carried over. No longer good for making cocktails, but good for future Cannabis extractions. Not sure how much Cannabis goodies they got yet, but looks promising. Thumbs up
Let us declare nature to be legitimate. All plants should be declared legal, and all animals for that matter. The notion of illegal plants and animals is obnoxious and ridiculous.
— Terence McKenna


All my posts are hypothetical and for educational/entertainment purposes, and are not an endorsement of said activities. SWIM (a fictional character based on other people) either obtained a license for said activity, did said activity where it is legal to do so, or as in most cases the activity is completely fictional.
 
downwardsfromzero
#6 Posted : 12/2/2022 1:11:05 PM

Boundary condition

ModeratorChemical expert

Posts: 8617
Joined: 30-Aug-2008
Last visit: 07-Nov-2024
Location: square root of minus one
Careful distillation with good equipment should produce satisfactory results, indeed. There will always be some scented volatiles among the extractables so at some point in the continuation of solvent recovery cycles it becomes necessary to run it through a carbon filter.

If this is something that you're (or your friend is) doing in bulk on an ongoing basis you might want to consider ozonation: https://dr.lib.iastate.e...1-458d-9579-4009d37d5418
although this is of course a technical solution which presents significant hazards and requires an appropriate level of competence, expertise and understanding.

Footnote: chlorophyll itself won't distil over because it's too large a molecule to be volatile, but various of its decomposition products are destillable.




“There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
Mitakuye Oyasin
#7 Posted : 12/2/2022 11:13:49 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 992
Joined: 10-Dec-2010
Last visit: 24-Oct-2023
Location: Earth's atmosphere
Thanks for that info. I'll pass it along.
Let us declare nature to be legitimate. All plants should be declared legal, and all animals for that matter. The notion of illegal plants and animals is obnoxious and ridiculous.
— Terence McKenna


All my posts are hypothetical and for educational/entertainment purposes, and are not an endorsement of said activities. SWIM (a fictional character based on other people) either obtained a license for said activity, did said activity where it is legal to do so, or as in most cases the activity is completely fictional.
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.018 seconds.