SnozzleBerry wrote:benzyme wrote:SnozzleBerry wrote:As to Gary Johnson...my thoughts on American Libertarianism are that it's a recipe for disaster. In the US, Libertarianism is essentially corporate tyranny
how do you figure?
libertarianism is what democracy actually
should be.
preservation of civil liberties, without corporate or state interference.
American libertarianism is the removal of State power without doing anything to address corporate power, private property, class hierarchy or capitalism (it's no surprise that the Koch-funded Tea Party is one of the largest mouthpieces for current American libertarian ideology). The most powerful entities in an American libertarian model will be corporations, and the corporate power structure is inherently tyrannical.
European libertarianism or "libertarian socialism" is quite the opposite, presenting 'a non-hierarchical, non-bureaucratic society without private property in the means of production'. So, yes, I agree with your statement that libertarianism is what democracy should be, just not libertarianism as practiced and generally defined/applied in the US.
I typically don't get involved with the political debates, because they always seems to turn negative. However, Snozzleberry, I really want to make sure I understand your viewpoint as I always find your posts to be eloquent and intelligent.
I don't really believe any political system is perfect, because they all have different deficiencies that lead to different extremes, corruption, and problems in the long run. However, I really feel that the only way ANY form of socialism could ever work would be if the world were populated by people with mindsets similar to the Nexians I respect the most.
Unfortunately, that is definitely not the case. The problem I find with socialism is that it takes away the desire of many people to work hard to accomplish things on their own and succeed. How do you get around the fact that the vast majority of people, when given the option of working for $x/hour, or receiving the same amount of take home pay for doing absolutely nothing, will choose to do nothing?
The end result is that the % of people taking from the system eventually override the % of people feeding the system, and an economic collapse occurs. Outside of a vacuum, how can a system that rewards people for working less, making poor choices, and being less productive be sustainable?
All posts are completely fictional and for educational purposes only