Quote:But even if you come to a point where you can justify it, does that make it fair for everyone else?
Without adressing the categorical imperative here....
Well, it's not about that, really. I can only speak from my experience and tell you what happened to me after something very "punishable" happened to someone close to me. At first, i was shocked, then, a sense of calm overcame me, with the clear determination, that the person in question should die. With that, a weird sadness took hold of me. I felt as if that poor person was beyond salvagable and needed to be destroyed for the greater good of society, and because...it was just the right thing to do. All resources would be lost on him and even if we had enough resources, these resources would be better spent on the victim. That's how i still feel. I would not go through with it, and would not advocate it, because in the end, said person is just hurt as well. Its a weird mixture of helplessness, anger, sadness and the feeling you get if you have to put down your pet bunny because it caught the sniffles.
As for violence being necessary...
Well, if you have lived a sheltered life, it is veeerry easy to argue from the moral highground. If fighting back is the ONLY option to prevent further damage and trauma to yourself, i can 100% understand the decision to be violent. Make no mistake, this makes you a contributer to hell on earth too, and it is selfish in a way. But then, we only live ONCE and if smashing a kid to the ground could mean a life without trauma, depression for you...then that's how it is. Unfortunatly.