Bisy wrote:...ok, so ill agree that "no clues" could be inaccurate or misleading, but "we" stays. that is what "we" are doing here.
"We" are definitely on the same page now
I sounded nitpicking but here's where I came from: I find most of trouble induced by humans onto the world and each other is the use of generalizations, black-white stances or lack of nuances, it feeds polarization at large. I became a bit allergic to it because a lot of useful intel is bypassed when getting used to "using generalizations". My goal was noble in that regard.
This part of OP has my interest:
Quote:... they dont want to mess with something that crucial. and it makes me curious. could there be something to their reasoning? could we be messing with something that will have an impact on how we experience death...
If the answer is yes (there is impact) then why should we automatically assume that the impact is negative, and thus avoidance is the best way to go with it?
As I said "not doing" has impact as well. A lot of people could benefit from the plasticity entheogens can offer. Long time users of aya have been monitored and found not degenerated, on the contrary.
As with any asset, it could be used unwise or unlucky.
My personal take on this is: if use is nothing like the real death race, then at least we're stretching muscles of consciousness.