Man, I'd love to synthesize some DMT LSDate
(the salt of the DMT+ cation and LSD- anion)
mmmmmmmmmmm
Now seriously? I aspire to conclude my chemistry college degree
and find some condoned psychedelic research somewhere sometime.
OK, lab work tickles my fancy and that'll do for a while, but
here in Holland there's a foundation aimed at bringing university's
and academy's attention to psychedelic research. Maybe if I come
up with some really constructive theorem one day they let us
investigate the sacraments that help us link to a plane most
of us lost touch of!
At the moment I'm very interested in putting experience reports
(whether in anecdotal form or surveys) next to neurochemistry.
Try to find the parameters that make a molecule interact with
a certain neurotransmitter/neural system.
Also, on another forum I'm a major contributor to a community
project to start a psychedelics survey that hopefully will
put different substances in a multidimensional spectrum.
(and I don't mean that in a trippy way
). Unfortunately we
progress slowly but some day we can put a profile on the
variety of psychedelics we know.
No two people are the same, no two drugs are exactly the same,
no two situations or settings are the same.
But still we can distinguish differences in the experienced
effects which leads me to believe these universal propensities
to exert a distinct effect (if not in an instance then marked
over time) can be profiled, so that people can be better
informed of the probabilities of the risks and desired effects.
There are concerns of overconfidence once probabilities and
profiles are published, but in my opinion misinterpretation
of well-derived claims happen every day and are inevitable.
A disclaimer should suffice. I hope I'm not being too liberal
bout this
I greet everyone on this forum and look forward to mutual
contributions and matching mindsets. Peace friends