DMT definitely has a different route than other drugs. It is typically extracted by people whose main purpose is to consume it themselves, not make profit (like meth, lsd, molly, heroin). So this route is going to make the reputation of the drug differently. If the extractor gives DMT to another person, they will usually gauge out if the consumer is very willing and "ready" for the experience. The extractor and the consumer will probably at the very least express philosophical or metaphysical beliefs, which will break the whole "drug deller" paradigm.
I think the Spirit molecule did a good job for its purpose. It popularized DMT to people who are already a fan of psychedelics and it showed scientific Clinical tests about DMT to the mainstream.
So overall i think the reputation for dmt is going good.
except that Australia catches a whiff of that rubber smelling spice and thus may ban hundreds of DMT containing plants. that's another subject; that maybe more cultural to that region so I do not know what is goin on exactly.
I am a saltydawg using my master's computer posting fictional posts for another saltydawg that lives in a different country.