New members are always welcome as long as they're not incorrigible idiots
.
How this might translate into sustaining a reasonable equilibrium number of members to keep the chat interesting, I'm not sure. There are (very) occasional videos on Youtube where people take a look through the Nexus forum although they seem to attract very little attention. It's not something that the YT algorithm pushes to the top in any case.
On that note, I don't particularly foresee us maintaining an 'official' presence on Twitter or any of the other usual social media platforms either, while I get the impression that perhaps MAPS, for example, does. Perhaps this raises the question of whether the forum, along with the chat and the wiki, suffice as our sole presence in the world.
The point about time zones is also relevant to me. Being an English-speaking forum, it's not so surprising there's a bias towards the American side of the Atlantic - in Europe there's a wider choice of languages and thus one more barrier to engagement, however slight.
I think to a certain extent we simply have to accept the marginal nature of a curated forum on psychoactive plants. It would be wise to consider what the contingency might be if the 'ebb' exceeds the 'flow' by too great of a degree - and sometimes it looks that way to me too. At a baseline level my suggestion is to make an effort to include as much up to date news on psychedelics as we can. This should help us in the act of seeming to be relevant to the modern day seeker.
JustB612's recent suggestion elsewhere on the forum of tidying up some of the topics (e.g., Phalaris information) ties into this. If we're presenting reliable information about psychoactives it requires an ongoing input of curation. That ultimately falls back to us moderators and we'll do what we can in that respect.
If any Nexus members are willing to prepare specific and detailed lists of topics that require curating, moving, merging and otherwise tinkering with, that would be immensely helpful.
“There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli