โค๏ธโ🔥
Posts: 3648 Joined: 11-Mar-2017 Last visit: 19-Nov-2024 Location: 🌎
|
Recent years have seen a lot of activity and instrumentation development dedicated to Raman spectroscopy. Thanks to advances and accessibility to economical solid state photodetectors and optical fibers, individuals are starting to build their own Raman systems. Is there is any interest from some nexians to collaborate on this? Here is a setup on witch I'm thinking to pull the trigger on: Laser - 532nm green laser with beam focused on optic fiber ($50) Light transmission: -3-way optical fused (FBT) fiber to connect the laser/sample/spectrometer. On the way in the fiber is singlemode to select 532nm. On the way back from the sample the fiber ends in a collimated connection that is sent to the spectrometer ($200). Spectrometer: -Sony IMX385 based camera ($300). Supposedly can detect a handful of photons (!) -Camera lens ($150) -600 lines/mm refraction diffraction grating ($150) -Long pass edge filter ($150) So looking at a $1K investment. Any thoughts? Edit: components are continually being changed. Updates in the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
โค๏ธโ🔥
Posts: 3648 Joined: 11-Mar-2017 Last visit: 19-Nov-2024 Location: 🌎
|
Taking first baby Raman steps. I ended up finding a cheap surplus spectrometer and got one of the many cheap 532nm green lasers that are on the market. Both together where <$250. Tested the laser source without any optics and it is giving a narrow peak (~10 pixels FWHM, and encouragingly one can identify the single peak pixel reliably). A small step, but it is encouraging how narrow and clean the unfiltered raw laser line is. The cheap spectrometer does seem to have a couple hot pixels near ~700 pixel index (roughly the wavelength in nm but it is not fully calibrated yet), but that is not a show stopper. Next, need to install some optics to remove the laser (edge filter) and help collect Raman emission (converging lenses). The spectrometer needs calibration and maybe an internal alignment adjustment. I've found a good edge filter for $70 and that's coming soon. I'll post more if I make more progress or anyone has questions. Loveall attached the following image(s): greenlaser.jpg (150kb) downloaded 397 time(s).
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
yo, Iโm gonna follow your lead on this project, bought the same components, and two 532nm bandpass filters ($18 ). For comparison, I will include ftir scans on the same samples. This is a learning opportunity for me, as I know very little about raman. reading Raman Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (2000), I found out that lasers with outputs from 5mW to 5 watts may be used, so 200mW is quite suitable. "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
Apparently 785nm is the middle-ground compromise, between fluorescence and S/N ratio. I ordered a 532nm module, and a 780nm module; 200mW for the former, 800mW for the latter. The TTL component looks similar...how did you power up the laser? "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
โค๏ธโ🔥
Posts: 3648 Joined: 11-Mar-2017 Last visit: 19-Nov-2024 Location: 🌎
|
I used an old 12V netgear router power cord and spliced it into the open connection that comes with the laser (this open board connection was not pictured at the vendor site, but fortunately it came with the laser). Only one power polarity works since it is a diode (I got it wrong the first time, nothing was damaged). See picture below. I'm working now on collecting optics after the laser goes through the sample. After some time thinking of this is the best I can come up with: 12.7mm (aka half inch or aka SM05) optical tube to easily put everything together (~$50) Fiber optic SMA attachment for the optical tube ($25) 12.5mm edge filter, these seem to be good quality based on info in the s cience madness forum (~$45) 12.5mm AR coated converging lens (~$35). The kind designed to project a point source into a point projector which is double convex. I may get a couple lenses, don't know. I plan to play around with a free optical ray trace simulation to see what makes more sense as far as focal length (e.g., optical cable is 200um and accepts .22 NA rays I believe). Maybe I'm just splitting hairs at this point. This is the last piece I need to decide to order. I may need a couple extra retaining rings to hold the filter and lens(es) in place inside the tube (only $4 each). There is also the option of simply getting a pre-aligned SMA collector lens for which there is also a larger more expensive version. It should work but that is really designed to collect a collimated bean and the cheaper version has a clear aperture of 5mm which is a smaller than one gets with the optical tube ~10mm, meaning one can collect scattered Raman light over an angle 4x bigger. I'm going ahead down the optical tube path, but this other option is worth mentioning. For a similar price I prefer the optical tube because: 1) It is flexible/up-gradable (e.g. if one gets a working Raman, would swapping in achromatic lenses help put more light into the focal point?, or Could one could attach an Iris in the optical tube see if that cleans-up the signal?, etc.) 2) Attaching the bare edge filter should be very straight forward the optical tube (simple slide it in in front of the collecting lens(es)). Last step would be to align the collector tube and the laser. I hope this is not too difficult, but have not thought about it much yet. Where did you find the $18 band pass filters? I still need to order one or two of these. I'm not 100% they are needed since the green laser looks so clean, but folks say it is needed so I'm probably wrong and will need to get them. Loveall attached the following image(s): IMG_20180623_123225120_LL.jpg (4,660kb) downloaded 352 time(s).
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
e.bay I need to read much more into it, since you're already employing other optics. From what I've read, the bandpass filter is typically used at the source, before the focusing lens. It's suggested, especially with DPSS lasers like 532, to filter out the IR wavelengths. Makes sense, as it would reduce noise. The DIY scheme being proposed here is very attractive, as it is modular, and various optics/lasers could be swapped out depending on the application. "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
โค๏ธโ🔥
Posts: 3648 Joined: 11-Mar-2017 Last visit: 19-Nov-2024 Location: 🌎
|
Right, the excitation Neodymium wavelength around 1064nm which I think is what most 532nm lasers use. That would be outside the spectrometer range (we would not see it), but it would heat up everything and generate noise. Some lasers filter that out internally better than others, not sure of the cheap laser we are using. I put my hand in front of the laser and could not sense any heat (for whatever that is worth). I think I'll test in both filtered and non filtered configuration. I also got green laser safety glasses ($10). It is a must for anything beyond 5mW, and there have already been a couple times the laser hit the glasses as I was moving things around. Safety first .
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
I've attached some essential reading for anyone interested. "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
"No, seriously"
Posts: 7324 Joined: 18-Jan-2007 Last visit: 02-Nov-2024 Location: Orion Spur
|
Loveall wrote:I also got green laser safety glasses ($10). It is a must for anything beyond 5mW, and there have already been a couple times the laser hit the glasses as I was moving things around. Safety first . Safety first indeed! Best to invent in some real glasses: Kind regards, The Traveler
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
holy crap, this is redneck-rigged; but the theory is solid. looks like the classic old-school dispersive raman configuration (90º ) "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
https://www.laserlands.n...ser-module-with-ttl.htmlthis is the other module I got. Not exactly cheap, but should be suitable for Raman. I'll definitely need to get some goggles. I've read that response is a bell curve across the wavelength spectrum, dropping significantly at higher wavelengths (>650 nm) when using Si-CCD as a detector. Hence, I went with high-output. What made you choose 1/2" lenses over 1"? portability, I suppose. See pg. 96 on Raman Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (McCreery, 2000). Fiber optic sampling seems most conducive/simplified to this CCD detector. Here's a general schematic for a probehow about something like this, for solution analysis? also, here's a great page on Raman from Thorlabs. "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
โค๏ธโ🔥
Posts: 3648 Joined: 11-Mar-2017 Last visit: 19-Nov-2024 Location: 🌎
|
Wow, 800mW, you are not kidding around benzyme. The links and attachments are very helpful and interesting, many thanks. The light tight cubet holder is really interesting. Also the cuvetes look really good. Honestly it looks a lot better than my current approach optical tube up against a clear glass vial being shot at by a laser. Are you going to have the laser output be by optical fiber? The optical fiber (immersion?) sensor is teesting too. How cool would it be to analyze an extract by simply dipping a Raman probe into it? And I thought digital pH meters were cool... I went with 1/2" because of price and what I could find on eBay and what I knew at the time. Each lens/filter is a little cheaper. Also thinking (guessing) that abberatioms will be smaller with lower aperture, but of course one captures less scatteres light so the net effect on signal is not clear (and one could allways add an iris or fancier lenses on the lareger system to optimize the signal). A 1" system could very well be better, what committed me was the edge filter (as I found a hopefully good cheap one which was 12.5mm). For sure, all this is very upgradable and expandable. If the basic setup works upgrades are many. Could become an expensive hobby.
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
I was thinking of going the all-fiber route for simplicity, but the tube route (i.e. probe) makes sense for scanning surfaces . and you arenโt kidding, the price adds up quick. a mounted beamsplitter from thorlabs is over $500 Trying to determine whether or not I should get an optics breadboard for all the mounts. I love browsing their site. so many cool toys, so little expendable funds (Iโd hear about it from the wifey). Iโve already dumped a bit into the analytical instruments I have, and am trying to justify Raman. As if I wasnโt already considered a mad scientist, seeing lasers in the lab would make me certifiable. "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 4612 Joined: 17-Jan-2009 Last visit: 07-Mar-2024
|
benzyme wrote: I love browsing their site. so many cool toys, so little expendable funds (Iโd hear about it from the wifey). Iโve already dumped a bit into the analytical instruments I have, and am trying to justify Raman. As if I wasnโt already considered a mad scientist, seeing lasers in the lab would make me certifiable.
|
|
|
Boundary condition
Posts: 8617 Joined: 30-Aug-2008 Last visit: 07-Nov-2024 Location: square root of minus one
|
This has to be one of the most exciting threads here at the moment. It may even inspire me to improve my income stream as this would be near the top of the list of fun toys to add to my collection. Do we have any other Europe-based participants for this? โThere is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work." โ Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
heh, yeah I got bit by the spec bug real bad. After a bit of thought, this is very enticing due to the lack of sample prep needed, and no requirement for high vacuum. Only one thing irks me about this analytical technique: there is no standardized sampling method. I emailed sales@thorlabs to get a parts list for a probe like this http://bwtek.com/raman-c...of-a-raman-spectrometer/ which would be suitable for scanning surfaces and glass containers, even amber vials. "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
Got the 780nM laser today, the green one is on the way. Been corresponding with an apps engineer from thorlabs, for pieces for the probe, and the cuvette holder route. I'll post any good info I get. benzyme attached the following image(s): IMG_4921.jpg (1,813kb) downloaded 235 time(s)."Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
Ok, so itโs looking more like this is the configuration Iโm going to roll with, with an excitation-collection fiber like this. I just bought one. there's no turning back now. benzyme attached the following image(s): B86D517F-CEC2-475A-8715-7CF1424ABE30.png (1,303kb) downloaded 234 time(s)."Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
analytical chemist
Posts: 7463 Joined: 21-May-2008 Last visit: 03-Mar-2024 Location: the lab
|
If you're going to go the fiber route, I suggest getting a couple of these Trying to get spectrum-studio running in Virtualbox on a macbook pro. I'm envisioning a setup where I can put all components in a backpack or man-purse, and analyze on the go. *edit* I successfully got Spec studio running on the mb pro. Thorlabs never got back to me, so Iโm just going to wing it with that schematic. "Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah "Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
|
|
|
โค๏ธโ🔥
Posts: 3648 Joined: 11-Mar-2017 Last visit: 19-Nov-2024 Location: 🌎
|
This is fascinating. I'm going down the optical tube path, which may have been a mistake, but I'm committed now since parts are in order. Setup will be different than the fiber probe, so we can compare how they do and maybe learn moar about different options (we have the same spectrometer so comparisons would be meaningful I think). Update on where I'm at: 1) Done: Laser and spectrometer up and running. Got the long-pass filter from ebay 2) In progress: I have ordered the 1/2" optical tube and parts to fill it up: laser cleanup filter, focusing lenses, SMA adapter (thorlab) and small cuvettes (ebay, since standard 12.5mm cuvette will not fit in the tube). Playing around with the optical ray tracer program led me to go for the aspheric collector lenses with 8mm of focal length. Setup description is below. One downside is that when the light hits the edge pass filter it is not collimated, so the long filter performance will not be optimal (worst case I need to change up the lens setup to collimate the beam before the edegpass filter and then add 3rd convergent lenses). Note that collimating the beam before the edgepass filter would also allow a 2x focused laser path through the cuvette since the edge pass filter is dichroic and should reflect the laser light). 3) Future work: I still need a way to align the fully loaded optical tube and the laser. After poking around I may get some stuff from the gun industry . They have very cheap systems to align optics on gun scopes using what they call a "picatinny" system. I think that would be sufficient and work, but not sure. Seems like the cheap route so worth a try I think. Here is the simple optical tube setup modeled in optical ray tracer (open the spoiler to see all the details, it can be copied/pasted into the program and parts can be moved around - if anyone finds a better simulation let me know. Interested in a simple setup where collimated light hits the edge filter).
# OpticalRayTracer 9.6 # http://arachnoid.com/OpticalRayTracer# 2018.07.01 14:23:00 EDT # Raman optical tube V0.0 # Notes: # Laser coming from the left would be smaller (~2mm) # Laser has been made wide to simulate the Raman emission in the cuvette # If the bandpass filter is dichroic, Raman emission moving left should be reflected back # Raman emission occurs everywhere in the cuvette the laser hits # Only showing emission where the laser is focused in the cuvete # Collimating the light hitting the edge pass filter could be a improvement (2x laser pass) program { antialias = false askBeforeDeleting = true beamAngle = 0.000000e+00 beamCount = 20 beamWidth = 1 clipboardGraphicXSize = 1280 colorArrow = -2147483393 colorBaseline = -16760832 colorBeam = -4194304 colorGrid = 1086374080 colorHighBackground = -1 colorLensOutline = 276865279 colorLensSelected = 268484608 colorLightSource = -16776961 colorLowBackground = -16777216 colorTerminator = -16777216 decimalPlaces = 4 defaultWindowHeight = 600 defaultWindowWidth = 900 dispScale = 0.015251 dispersionBeams = 8 divergingSource = false helpScrollPos = 0 interLensEpsilon = 1.000000e-06 intersectionArrowSize = 0.000000e+00 inverse = false maxIntersections = 64 selectedComponent = 6 selectedTab = 0 showControls = true showGrid = true snapValue = 0.000000e+00 surfEpsilon = 5.000000e-04 tableLineLimit = 500 virtualSpaceSize = 100.000000 windowX = 100 windowY = 100 xBeamRotationPlane = 0.000000e+00 xBeamSourceRefPlane = -30.000000 xOffset = 12.189982 yEndBeamPos = 3.500000 yOffset = 0.061811 yStartBeamPos = -3.500000 } object { active = true angle = 0.000000e+00 centerThickness = 0.100000 dispersion = 59.000000 function = 2 ior = 1.520000 leftCurvature = 3 leftSphereRadius = 10.000000 leftZValue = 20.000000 lensRadius = 0.100000 name = Terminal Plane rightCurvature = 3 rightSphereRadius = 10.000000 rightZValue = 20.000000 symmetrical = true thickness = 0.100000 xPos = 33.962500 yPos = 0.005000 } object { active = true angle = 0.000000e+00 centerThickness = 4.000000 dispersion = 59.000000 function = 0 ior = 1.520000 leftCurvature = 3 leftSphereRadius = 28.100000 leftZValue = 20.000000 lensRadius = 6.250000 name = LongpassFilter 540AELP rightCurvature = 3 rightSphereRadius = 28.100000 rightZValue = 20.000000 symmetrical = true thickness = 4.000000 xPos = 18.420800 yPos = 0.000000e+00 } object { active = true angle = 0.000000e+00 centerThickness = 7.499915 dispersion = 59.000000 function = 0 ior = 1.499000 leftCurvature = 2 leftSphereRadius = 15.600000 leftZValue = 20.000000 lensRadius = 6.350000 name = ACL12708U-A rightCurvature = 2 rightSphereRadius = 6.706500 rightZValue = 100.000000 symmetrical = false thickness = 1.600000 xPos = -6.578100 yPos = 0.000000e+00 } object { active = true angle = 0.000000e+00 centerThickness = 7.499915 dispersion = 59.000000 function = 0 ior = 1.499000 leftCurvature = 2 leftSphereRadius = 6.706500 leftZValue = 100.000000 lensRadius = 6.350000 name = ACL12708U-A Inverted rightCurvature = 2 rightSphereRadius = 15.600000 rightZValue = 20.000000 symmetrical = false thickness = 1.600000 xPos = 10.412000 yPos = 0.000000e+00 } object { active = true angle = 0.000000e+00 centerThickness = 6.000000 dispersion = 59.000000 function = 0 ior = 1.520000 leftCurvature = 3 leftSphereRadius = 28.100000 leftZValue = 20.000000 lensRadius = 6.350000 name = FL05532-10 Bandpass rightCurvature = 3 rightSphereRadius = 28.100000 rightZValue = 20.000000 symmetrical = true thickness = 6.000000 xPos = -15.640300 yPos = 0.000000e+00 } object { active = true angle = 0.000000e+00 centerThickness = 0.500000 dispersion = 59.000000 function = 0 ior = 1.520000 leftCurvature = 3 leftSphereRadius = 28.100000 leftZValue = 20.000000 lensRadius = 15.000000 name = Beckman 758407 wall rightCurvature = 3 rightSphereRadius = 28.100000 rightZValue = 20.000000 symmetrical = true thickness = 0.500000 xPos = -2.251000 yPos = 0.000000e+00 } object { active = true angle = 0.000000e+00 centerThickness = 0.500000 dispersion = 59.000000 function = 0 ior = 1.520000 leftCurvature = 3 leftSphereRadius = 28.100000 leftZValue = 20.000000 lensRadius = 15.000000 name = Beckman 758407 wall rightCurvature = 3 rightSphereRadius = 28.100000 rightZValue = 20.000000 symmetrical = true thickness = 0.500000 xPos = 2.251000 yPos = 0.000000e+00 } object { active = true angle = 0.000000e+00 centerThickness = 4.000000 dispersion = 59.000000 function = 0 ior = 1.330000 leftCurvature = 3 leftSphereRadius = 28.100000 leftZValue = 20.000000 lensRadius = 15.000000 name = Liquid Sample rightCurvature = 3 rightSphereRadius = 28.100000 rightZValue = 20.000000 symmetrical = true thickness = 4.000000 xPos = 0.000000e+00 yPos = 0.000000e+00 }
Loveall attached the following image(s): raman v0.jpg (197kb) downloaded 201 time(s).
|