DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 6 Joined: 01-May-2013 Last visit: 12-Apr-2023 Location: usa
|
hey guys im on a time crunch and have been using cybs salt tek with good results, i need to speed stuff up anyone can point me in the right direction, i have 500g but am trying to make two 250g batches
|
|
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 1023 Joined: 19-Mar-2016 Last visit: 07-Apr-2024
|
Cybs tek if the fastest you can do. Most other teks involve boiling and multiple pulls. Just reduce the time during acidfication and you are the fastes possible with still good yields. Or just skip the acid stage and go STB (straight to base)
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 6 Joined: 01-May-2013 Last visit: 12-Apr-2023 Location: usa
|
am i able to combine cybs into a bigger jar?
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 6 Joined: 01-May-2013 Last visit: 12-Apr-2023 Location: usa
|
Ulim wrote:Cybs tek if the fastest you can do.
Most other teks involve boiling and multiple pulls.
Just reduce the time during acidfication and you are the fastes possible with still good yields.
Or just skip the acid stage and go STB (straight to base) yeah been doing stb, i just hate having 5 50g jars it sucks!!! umm should i leave the bark in the basic soup or should i separate it from it for a cleaner product? will it affect my yeld?
|
|
|
Boundary condition
 
Posts: 8617 Joined: 30-Aug-2008 Last visit: 07-Nov-2024 Location: square root of minus one
|
Good luck filtering bark out of a basic soup, I wouldn't want to bother trying. And I never saw a STB method that involved separating the bark. Nothing wrong with experimenting, though. Report your results, and stay safe. “There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work." ― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 6 Joined: 01-May-2013 Last visit: 12-Apr-2023 Location: usa
|
downwardsfromzero wrote:Good luck filtering bark out of a basic soup, I wouldn't want to bother trying. And I never saw a STB method that involved separating the bark.
Nothing wrong with experimenting, though. Report your results, and stay safe. is the bark supposed to completely dissolve in the soup?
|
|
|
Boundary condition
Posts: 8617 Joined: 30-Aug-2008 Last visit: 07-Nov-2024 Location: square root of minus one
|
Quote:is the bark supposed to completely dissolve in the soup? It won't. Not for a long time. Soup made with powdered MHRB left for 3 years will still have particles in it. “There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work." ― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 1104 Joined: 11-Feb-2017 Last visit: 18-Jan-2021
|
Also voting for Cyb's MAX ION or Salt Tek. I like to use this 1L Simax reagent bottle since it has narrowing neck, great for pulling NPS by pipette:  It works for 150 g MHRB powder if you fiddle with water amounts so it fills up to the narrowing part. I will try scaled up extraction (250-300 g) with the same kind of bottle, only 2L.
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 6 Joined: 01-May-2013 Last visit: 12-Apr-2023 Location: usa
|
blue.magic wrote:Also voting for Cyb's MAX ION or Salt Tek. I like to use this 1L Simax reagent bottle since it has narrowing neck, great for pulling NPS by pipette: It works for 150 g MHRB powder if you fiddle with water amounts so it fills up to the narrowing part. I will try scaled up extraction (250-300 g) with the same kind of bottle, only 2L. not sure how it would work with 150 when the jars already have around 1l into them
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 6 Joined: 01-May-2013 Last visit: 12-Apr-2023 Location: usa
|
blue.magic wrote:Also voting for Cyb's MAX ION or Salt Tek. I like to use this 1L Simax reagent bottle since it has narrowing neck, great for pulling NPS by pipette: It works for 150 g MHRB powder if you fiddle with water amounts so it fills up to the narrowing part. I will try scaled up extraction (250-300 g) with the same kind of bottle, only 2L. i do use pipette but still want to know how you put 150gs of bark into 750 ml of water, that will make it EXTRA thick
|
|
|
DMT-Nexus member
Posts: 3574 Joined: 18-Apr-2012 Last visit: 05-Feb-2024
|
minimid wrote:still want to know how you put 150gs of bark into 750 ml of water, that will make it EXTRA thick 150g of powdered/crushed bark should easily fit in a 1 litre bottle ( even upto 250g)...leaving enough room for water and a space for the solvent to sit. If you use more bark and it starts getting 'sludgy' ... get a bigger bottle and put some more water in. The amounts are a guide so people don't have to think too much...they can just follow the recipe. From another thread: cyb wrote:You move your acid phase to pH 2-4 in an aqueous solution. You then move to pH11 or above in the same solution (this is freebase) ... then you pull with minimal amount of non polar solvent.
It's that simple...
You DO NOT use ratios + or - ingredients. (only pH manipulation)
If you can obtain a 'watery environment' (non sludgy) with bark/water/salt/acid/alkaline ... that's all you need to do. (unless performing a dry tek) Picture attached is just 50g cyb attached the following image(s):  Cyb-Tekpic3-EQUIPMENT.jpg (59kb) downloaded 67 time(s).Please do not PM tek related questions Reserve the right to change your mind at any given moment.
|