Quote:why has fundamentalist scientific logic always ignored the elephant in the room?
Throughout its history, this kind of logic has followed a very basic pattern.
1.present an idea that rationally explains the unknown
2.accept idea as truth
3.ridicule all dissent of the idea
4.Scrap the idea
5.repeat from step one
Thats not how science works at all. But anyway..
I offered an explanation to why these kinds of patterns emerge. I don't see whats so fundamentalist about that? Its a real explanation its not my explanation its the explanation of mathematicians who study chaotic systems and complexity.
Why don't you actually look into some of the points I made instead of just calling it overly rational logical scientific thinking?