We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
New member, long time lurker, hypothesis regarding a modified fasa tek Options
 
whamo
#1 Posted : 2/21/2016 4:24:20 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 4
Joined: 14-Feb-2016
Last visit: 17-May-2016
Location: upper crust of the earth
Hi all,
I've been a lurker for about a year now (I usefully never find myself on the nexus on the weekends to become a member) and I've absorbed a fair amount of information through my time browsing the nexus.

My question/ hypothesis,

Could a person salt out freebase DMT from a solvent (some people use toluene, xylene shouldn't be different) via fumaric acid?

I know toluene will not dissolve fumaric acid, but say a person were to add fumaric acid to a toluene solution containing spice, and stirred vigorously with a magnetic stirrer. SWIM hypothesizes that this would allow fumaric acid to pass through the toluene, coming in contact with suspended freebase DMT, forming DMT fumarate.

After this solution has mixed for a acceptable amount of time, let the precipitate settle and then use vacuum filtration to remove precipitate.

Now you may be thinking, the fumarate product contains too much fumaric acid, what would be the point?

But swim thinks if the tek for re-basification is followed using sodium carbonate, than excess fumaric acid forms the soluble sodium fumarate, and the freebase dmt precipitates out as expected.

Thoughts on this tek? The idea is to remove the use of acetone, so a person doesn't have to fuss with constantly drying, then separating the toluene/acetone to re-use solvent.

Yield may be below average, but the DMT left in the toluene isn't going anywhere and can be re used for subsequent pulls. If all of the product is desired, maybe a fasa wash in the last pull would suffice.

The tek idea may be total bunk, but I figured id ask!
-Wham
 

Explore our global analysis service for precise testing of your extracts and other substances.
 
downwardsfromzero
#2 Posted : 2/22/2016 5:28:11 AM

Boundary condition

ModeratorChemical expert

Posts: 8617
Joined: 30-Aug-2008
Last visit: 07-Nov-2024
Location: square root of minus one
You'd be better off looking at ways of not using toluene than ways of not using acetone, wouldn't you?

How about you test your method out and report back?




β€œThere is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
Spaced Out 2
#3 Posted : 2/22/2016 8:48:34 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 989
Joined: 27-Dec-2014
Last visit: 17-Feb-2024
Welcome to the community.

By the way no need to swim around here, we already know you aren't you Big grin



Peace
 
whamo
#4 Posted : 2/22/2016 1:11:29 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 4
Joined: 14-Feb-2016
Last visit: 17-May-2016
Location: upper crust of the earth
downwardsfromzero wrote:
You'd be better off looking at ways of not using toluene than ways of not using acetone, wouldn't you?

How about you test your method out and report back?


I have no problem working with toluene, it has provided much better pulls than with other non-polars that can be easily obtained. But minimizing the number of solutions that the DMT must travel through will result in less DMT loss due to any small amount being left in the solution, in my head at least. Also worrying about drying acetone, and washing acetone out of toluene, are steps that I wouldn't mind cutting out if possible Razz

I will hop in the lab and test it out this week hopefully Smile
Ill report back and send some pictures, as there is already an extraction in process to which this idea can be applied
 
downwardsfromzero
#5 Posted : 2/22/2016 8:20:34 PM

Boundary condition

ModeratorChemical expert

Posts: 8617
Joined: 30-Aug-2008
Last visit: 07-Nov-2024
Location: square root of minus one
Certainly an interesting idea, but maybe rather a waste of fumaric acid? Why not just back extract into fumaric acid solution? That would surely be more effective.




β€œThere is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
whamo
#6 Posted : 2/22/2016 9:22:20 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 4
Joined: 14-Feb-2016
Last visit: 17-May-2016
Location: upper crust of the earth
I'm not sure if there would be a large waste of fumaric acid, at least in relation to a fasa wash. There would also be no waste of acetone and the solvent can be immediately re-used for the next pull without having to wash out the acetone. Whereas in a fasa wash there would be a waste of acetone and excess fumaric acid (unless you re-dry the acetone washed out of the solvent, which to me is a step I wouldn't mind cutting out)

A back-extraction would provide just about the same results imo, but then you would be dealing with a new aqueous layer instead of a precipitate. Definitely nothing revolutionary,but potentially a small time and acetone saving option (if it even works). Ill try to do a side by side comparison of this vs. a regular fasa wash tomorrow, and post the results.
 
endlessness
#7 Posted : 2/23/2016 12:43:18 AM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 14191
Joined: 19-Feb-2008
Last visit: 05-Feb-2025
Location: Jungle
Yes it works and is so commonly done that often when we refer to FASA, this is what we mean, the use of FASA to salt alkaloids out of different solvents, whether its acetone or toluene or xylene or limonene etc. Check out BLAB tek for example
 
whamo
#8 Posted : 2/23/2016 1:03:07 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 4
Joined: 14-Feb-2016
Last visit: 17-May-2016
Location: upper crust of the earth
endlessness wrote:
Yes it works and is so commonly done that often when we refer to FASA, this is what we mean, the use of FASA to salt alkaloids out of different solvents, whether its acetone or toluene or xylene or limonene etc. Check out BLAB tek for example


Ah I see. I'm not sure which section of the BLAB tek this would immediately relate to though, as I am trying to see if fumaric acid can be added directly to the non-polar solvent, (not adding a fumaric acid saturated solvent, (fasw, fasa, fasipa, ect.)) and result in the precipitation of DMT fumerate.

I suppose I don't see the direct need to saturate a intermediate solvent with fumaric acid if you will re-basify the end product with sodium carbonate anyways, effectively removing any excess fumaric acid from the precipitate.
 
endlessness
#9 Posted : 2/23/2016 1:17:33 AM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 14191
Joined: 19-Feb-2008
Last visit: 05-Feb-2025
Location: Jungle
Im sorry i had misunderstood you. Yeah i thought adding FASA to the non polar

As for adding the fumaric acid directly, you could try and report back Pleased
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest (3)

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.022 seconds.