We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Are these mescaline cacti? Options
 
KloudQ7
#1 Posted : 2/13/2016 6:09:02 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 307
Joined: 11-Oct-2015
Last visit: 30-Nov-2022
Having trouble identifying these. help please?
KloudQ7 attached the following image(s):
20160213_080512.jpg (5,799kb) downloaded 99 time(s).
20160213_080601.jpg (5,414kb) downloaded 99 time(s).
20160213_080655.jpg (4,051kb) downloaded 102 time(s).
 

STS is a community for people interested in growing, preserving and researching botanical species, particularly those with remarkable therapeutic and/or psychoactive properties.
 
dreamer042
#2 Posted : 2/13/2016 9:05:17 PM

Dreamoar

Moderator | Skills: Mostly harmless

Posts: 4711
Joined: 10-Sep-2009
Last visit: 03-Feb-2025
Location: Rocky mountain high
I'm no pro so take my amateur opinion for what it it's worth.

Those top two photos look like cereus to me with the thin ribs. The third picture looks like may be a trich, it looks a lot like a peruvianus or cuzcoensis but the spination pattern looks more like a tershceckii.
Row, row, row your boat, Gently down the stream. Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily...

Visual diagram for the administration of dimethyltryptamine

Visual diagram for the administration of ayahuasca
 
KloudQ7
#3 Posted : 2/13/2016 9:09:30 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 307
Joined: 11-Oct-2015
Last visit: 30-Nov-2022
So possibly no good for extraction?
 
Enlightened_One
#4 Posted : 2/13/2016 9:24:24 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 67
Joined: 06-Nov-2013
Last visit: 03-Dec-2021
Those first ones appear to be Cereus peruvianus.. not worth an extraction.
 
KloudQ7
#5 Posted : 2/13/2016 10:21:49 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 307
Joined: 11-Oct-2015
Last visit: 30-Nov-2022
Thanks! What about the second one?
 
Gone-and-Back
#6 Posted : 2/14/2016 12:37:14 AM
DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 876
Joined: 20-Apr-2012
Last visit: 12-Feb-2019
Enlightened_One wrote:
Those first ones appear to be Cereus peruvianus.. not worth an extraction.


If this is what they are, they are still a good cactus to hold on too. It may not contain mescaline but Cereus Peruvianus will eventually produce edible fruit. It's also known as the Peruvian apple tree cactus. My mother in law has one that has a monstrose mutation, and once it got big enough it usually produces fruit every other year. I took a cutting and have yet to plant it but hope to do so this year so I can eventually try out the fruit it produces.
Everything published by Gone-and-Back are the mad rantings and ravings of a mind who yearns to be free and thinks he knows what he is talking about. However, these are just delusions made to feel that freedom, because that freedom will never come. Any experiments done are purely figments of the imagination, and are falsified to the highest degree. Nothing should be taken seriously from a crazy mans mind.
 
KloudQ7
#7 Posted : 2/14/2016 1:53:02 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 307
Joined: 11-Oct-2015
Last visit: 30-Nov-2022
Nice, i was probably going to plant those anyway. Dont want to toss it just cause its not active. I dont like to waste things. Can anyone id the second one? Would more photos help? It had flowers like a peruvianus
 
KloudQ7
#8 Posted : 2/15/2016 6:31:02 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 307
Joined: 11-Oct-2015
Last visit: 30-Nov-2022
No opinion on this second cactus?
KloudQ7 attached the following image(s):
20160214_162839.jpg (3,802kb) downloaded 23 time(s).
20160214_162917.jpg (3,595kb) downloaded 23 time(s).
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.012 seconds.