We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Naphtha Degreaser Solvent in DMT Extraction? Options
 
pogpiglet
#1 Posted : 12/13/2015 3:25:12 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 10
Joined: 12-Dec-2015
Last visit: 07-Mar-2016
Location: Kangarooland
Hi all, I hope this is the right place to lodge this query.
I have a 20L Drum of Heavy Duty Degreaser, which is by all reckoning a naphtha-based solvent;
Quote:
Oilsolve Degreaser is a 100% active quick break solvent based emulsifiable degreasing cleaning fluid suitable for removing heavy deposits of grease, oil, dirt and grime from vehicle engines, motorbikes, lawn mowers, turbines, tools, lathes, work benches, lube floors and walls, driveways and boat bilges. The quick break property of Oilsolve Degreaser ensures that the emulsified grease and oil readily separates in a grease trap, allowing the resultant water layer to be drained to the sewer as treated trade waste.


The MSDS clarifies this by stating the following
Quote:
Mixtures
64742-82-1. 98% naphtha, petroleum, hydrodesulfurised heavy
71-43-2 <0.1% benzene


My question to you guys is this: Can I use this as a substitute for a solvent in an A/B extraction of DMT? I'm unsure as to the ratios between the naphtha, petroleum and hydrodesulfurised heavy(?). Does anyone have any useful information regarding this? Is petroleum acceptable in a solvent for such an extraction?

I can just as easily get xylene, naphtha, toulene or d-limonene but if I've got purely by accident a 20L Solvent I could experiment with, well then hey... Thanks in advance, you guys are all doing great work in this field and I'm glad I could join the community!
 

Explore our global analysis service for precise testing of your extracts and other substances.
 
downwardsfromzero
#2 Posted : 12/13/2015 3:47:17 AM

Boundary condition

ModeratorChemical expert

Posts: 8617
Joined: 30-Aug-2008
Last visit: 07-Nov-2024
Location: square root of minus one
Emulsifiable sounds like a terrible idea...


Is the remaining 2% consisting of detergents?

I suppose you could try running any resulting emulsion through a grease trap...




β€œThere is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
pogpiglet
#3 Posted : 12/13/2015 4:54:41 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 10
Joined: 12-Dec-2015
Last visit: 07-Mar-2016
Location: Kangarooland
downwardsfromzero wrote:
Emulsifiable sounds like a terrible idea...


Is the remaining 2% consisting of detergents?

I suppose you could try running any resulting emulsion through a grease trap...


Yes I was unsure by what implication was meant by "emulsifiable". Does it literally mean it creates emulsions? Because that would be, like you say, a terrible idea.

I'm honestly not sure, that's kind of why I created this thread. There is a definite 1.9% not accounted for. No idea.

 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.012 seconds.