We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
DIfferent aproach to A/B Options
 
Spiralout
#1 Posted : 9/11/2015 8:23:32 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 600
Joined: 13-Dec-2013
Last visit: 11-Jun-2023
Hey folks

I'm wondering why not boil your bark in acidic solution a few times, filter bark, reduce solution
then continue from there. In my case I would add salt then lye then pull with naptha and do a backsalt.



Any and all input apreciated Thumbs up
 

Good quality Syrian rue (Peganum harmala) for an incredible price!
 
Spaced Out 2
#2 Posted : 9/11/2015 9:12:20 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 989
Joined: 27-Dec-2014
Last visit: 17-Feb-2024
Wouldn't that be the just of most of the A/B teks, most of them appear to involve simmering in acidic water? I wouldn't see why it would hurt to boil a few times and reduce.
But don't hold me to it as I use STB methods so maybe someone will chime in that frequents A/B techniques.
Good luck with whatever you decide to doThumbs up
 
NotTwo
#3 Posted : 9/11/2015 10:05:46 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 396
Joined: 08-Feb-2015
Last visit: 01-Mar-2023
I think most of the A/B teks suggest boiling in acidic water, pouring off the liquid, add more acidic water, pour off and repeat that cycle a few time. Not sure if you're suggesting here to simply boil it several times in the same liquid (?).

The thing about boiling in acidic water is that a load of the liquid is left in the mulch when you pour off hence maybe 25% of your dmt:salt is left in the mulch. By adding more liquid and boiling again you are left next time with 25% of 25% = 6.25%, next time 1.5%, next time 0.4%, etc.

If you kept the same liquid there each time and didn't pour off then you'd have the problem of how to get the remaining liquid out of the mulch. I squeeze inside a triple layer of cheese cloth but this only gets so much out.
In all of reality there are not two. There is just the one thing. And I am that.
 
Nitegazer
#4 Posted : 9/11/2015 4:08:24 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 368
Joined: 09-Jun-2011
Last visit: 27-Nov-2020
NotTwo is correct, and the question is addressed in this FAQ:

Can I make one long cook instead of 3 shorter ones

Three separate boils each with fresh (or acidified) water is best.
 
Spiralout
#5 Posted : 9/11/2015 9:53:54 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 600
Joined: 13-Dec-2013
Last visit: 11-Jun-2023
im sorry i didnt word this right.

I meant to do a acid boil filter bark and then do maybe another 4 boils collecting all the solution and then reducing. So you should be left with a small volume of liquid with no bark making for a more manageble extraction and hopefully less oil although a backsalt would still be a good idea.

Thanks
 
Spiralout
#6 Posted : 9/11/2015 10:48:32 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 600
Joined: 13-Dec-2013
Last visit: 11-Jun-2023
So I guess this is a basic a/b Confused This will be my next way of doing it.

Thanks all! Love
 
pitubo
#7 Posted : 9/11/2015 11:37:50 PM

dysfunctional word machine

Senior Member

Posts: 1831
Joined: 15-Mar-2014
Last visit: 11-Jun-2018
Location: at the center of my universe
spractral wrote:
So I guess this is a basic a/b Confused This will be my next way of doing it.

Lol. Learning something new everyday is magic.

If you want, you can shake the collected and reduced acidic tea with naphtha and then separate and discard the naphta layer. That is how you defat, it would reduce the amount of fats and waxes extracted later when you basify the tea and shake it with fresh naphtha to pull the spice.
 
Spiralout
#8 Posted : 9/12/2015 7:52:19 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 600
Joined: 13-Dec-2013
Last visit: 11-Jun-2023
I plan on doing 5 boils on the bark with vinegar, filtering bark everytinme and keeping soltution, then reducing acid solution, adding salt and basing with sodium hydroxide adn then pulling with naptha about 5 times and back salting the naptha pulls with vinegar. Also plan on getting a seperatory funnel to seperate the naptha pulls from base liquid.THink this should work well.

When I get arounf to it I will post pictures and method of everything I did.

Thanks for input and thank you everyone for input.


anymore always appresciated.

Twisted Evil
 
benzyme
#9 Posted : 9/12/2015 3:18:54 PM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 03-Mar-2024
Location: the lab
there's no good reason to add salt to an acidic solution, unless it's a margarita.

people add salt after they add the nonpolar solvent, to assist migration of the free base molecule from the polar phase into the nonpolar solvent.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
Spiralout
#10 Posted : 9/12/2015 4:02:57 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 600
Joined: 13-Dec-2013
Last visit: 11-Jun-2023
Right, I understand the salt is the help push the alkaloids out of the basic solution into the nps. I meant that as in it wouldn't seem to matter when i add the salt to the final reduced acidic solution but in actuallality i would probably add the salt after basing with sodium hydroxided.

I need to be more clear in my writing, my heads been kinda foggy lately.

I plan on getting a seperatory funnel; I'm thinking a one liter should be ok for a decent extraction after reducing acidic solution and removing bark and basing . Would you be able to go about mixing nps with basic solution in funnel or would that be best done in another vessel and then transefered to funnel for seperation? Also, what kind of vessel/flask/container would be best for the rest of the extraction? Such as adding the sodium hydroxide and salt to acidic solution and the backsalting phase.

I would like to move beyond "kitchen chemistry" and don't want to do another extraction unless I have all the ideal equipment and materials. This probably won't be carried out for awhile as I need to sort some other priorities in my life and study the chemistry involved (and in general ) a bit.

Thanks for input benz
 
Gowpen
#11 Posted : 9/13/2015 12:20:44 AM

If you don't make mistakes, you are doing it wrong


Posts: 439
Joined: 23-Nov-2011
Last visit: 30-Aug-2024
Location: In a Concrete Hole, always in a concrete hole
spractral wrote:
Right, I understand the salt is the help push the alkaloids out of the basic solution into the nps. I meant that as in it wouldn't seem to matter when i add the salt to the final reduced acidic solution but in actuallality i would probably add the salt after basing with sodium hydroxided.

I need to be more clear in my writing, my heads been kinda foggy lately.

I plan on getting a seperatory funnel; I'm thinking a one liter should be ok for a decent extraction after reducing acidic solution and removing bark and basing . Would you be able to go about mixing nps with basic solution in funnel or would that be best done in another vessel and then transefered to funnel for seperation? Also, what kind of vessel/flask/container would be best for the rest of the extraction? Such as adding the sodium hydroxide and salt to acidic solution and the backsalting phase.

I would like to move beyond "kitchen chemistry" and don't want to do another extraction unless I have all the ideal equipment and materials. This probably won't be carried out for awhile as I need to sort some other priorities in my life and study the chemistry involved (and in general ) a bit.

Thanks for input benz

I use an old tea towel to filtre the bark...... The particles are not too small and the bark stays in the cloth. I have seen Indian women filtering muddy water to crystal clear with a few layers of silk. No need to do this to the acid/bark mixture IMHO. Good luck. and yes be VERY carefull in the kitchen.
G
One can never cross the ocean without the Courage to lose sight of the shore
 
quetzalcoatl42
#12 Posted : 9/13/2015 4:09:56 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 186
Joined: 22-Jun-2011
Last visit: 13-Nov-2024
spractral wrote:
Hey folks

I'm wondering why not boil your bark in acidic solution a few times, filter bark, reduce solution
then continue from there. In my case I would add salt then lye then pull with naptha and do a backsalt.



Any and all input apreciated Thumbs up



standard procedure... did you even read the teks ?

you can also do that with leaves (Chaliponga, Chacruna, although its better if you defat in acidic phase)
 
1ce
#13 Posted : 9/13/2015 6:34:27 AM

Communications-Security Analyst


Posts: 1280
Joined: 17-Aug-2014
Last visit: 05-Feb-2024
Location: Nirvana
Defat (wash step) is moot if your contaminating source (bark) remains present. Don't filter? Don't bother, backsalt and A->B again.
 
Spiralout
#14 Posted : 9/14/2015 8:16:51 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 600
Joined: 13-Dec-2013
Last visit: 11-Jun-2023
Quetz, yes I have read plenty of teks and understand the basic chemistry though not anywhere near as much as I would like to. This would neccesitate me studying outside of the forum. And like 1ce said defatting during acidic phase is redundant; it makesmore sense to backsalt.

1ce what I am wondering is if I did enough acidic boils on the source material would it retrieve most (never going to be all) of the alks. I am not familiaar with using a seperatory funnel.

I was thinking of doing multiple acid boils, filtering, reducing, basing, adding salt and then pulling. After that a backsalt and another a/b.

I'm not sure about leaving source material in the first a/b as I would think some particles would get stuck when using the seperatory funnel...

Thanks everyone
 
NotTwo
#15 Posted : 9/14/2015 9:07:34 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 396
Joined: 08-Feb-2015
Last visit: 01-Mar-2023
1ce wrote:
Defat (wash step) is moot if your contaminating source (bark) remains present.


Yes, exactly!

In any case I've found that defatting at this stage is of almost zilch value. Just as a small experiment try this - I have! Defat with a reasonable about of solvent, take your solvent and put it into a clean glass container, ideally wide flat bottomed. Let it evapourate or encourage to do so with warmth or a fan. When there's no more solvent left check out what fats, oils, gunk is left in the container. My experience is practically none.
In all of reality there are not two. There is just the one thing. And I am that.
 
Spiralout
#16 Posted : 9/14/2015 11:14:19 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 600
Joined: 13-Dec-2013
Last visit: 11-Jun-2023
ya ive tried defating at acidic stage before. My guess is the high ph lyses the cells and releases more oil
 
1ce
#17 Posted : 9/14/2015 12:54:42 PM

Communications-Security Analyst


Posts: 1280
Joined: 17-Aug-2014
Last visit: 05-Feb-2024
Location: Nirvana
I just added an absurd amount of naps, and washed in a sep funnel at ~60C, then boiled off excess water and added 10% NaOH until I reach PH 12.5-13. I'll let this cool to room temp and proceed with the extraction.

I usually use chloroform, however any solvent will work. I pull my freebased alks into solvent, and separate it off. I wash my organic layer with distilled water (preboiled to drive off any dissolved CO2). I don't bother drying the solvent since it has a high VP any resisual water won't be around for long.

After solvent evaporates I add heptane to the container and heat it until boiling. Separate off heptane into a clean dish that has been further cleaned with acetone. I let solution crystallize at room temperature, then move to refridgerator.

Hexane also works great, I prefer heptane due to it's higher boiling point, which means more gradual precipitation.

pretty similar to all the teks our there. I always make sure the equipment I use is clean clean clean CLEAN.

 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest (4)

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.040 seconds.