We have a section called 'Other Psychoactives' with two subheadings which read 'Nootropics' and 'Novel Psychoactive Substances (RC)'. Currently the most recent active topic is about alcohol.
So fair game is nootropics, old and new, tested and untested, as well as all manner of research chemicals, some of which we have already talked about which have already claimed many lives...
No mention of a plant humanity has grown with for thousands of years?
If there's to be no cannabis section, we should at least prioritize it over these RCs and such, surely ? Even if the RC section is for peoples safety, taking substances which are so new, with so little data available it remains a bit of a gamble.
I don't know if anyone remembers when RCs were very much discouraged by the nexus' policy? There was a reason, and it's still valid, even if we took a different approach in the end. Still no acknowledgement of something which is safe?.
One step would be to have 'Cannabis' under the subheadings for the 'Other Psychoactives' section, but the topics in that section might get drowned out by posts about cannabis.
Another step would be just what this topic is pointing to. Acknowledge cannabis, create a section solely for it, and have more quality DMT-Nexus worthy discussion about it, without the cliché stoner forum / immature bro talk of some other cannabis community pages. Ours would be awesome. /End snobbery.
There is such a wealth of cannabis information, experience, scientific documentation and discussion scattered throughout the nexus. It deserves its own place.
Art Van D'lay wrote:Smoalk. It. And. See.