Orion wrote:I am a materialist, I don't believe in anything beyond the physical as much as I do a god (I am 99.9% sure there is no more). In all practical senses I am an atheist.
I respect your stance very much. Those who believe what they have not experienced directly themselves, are placing their attention and basing their cosmology upon a kind of blind faith, and I just don't really understand how this is ever a worthwhile thing.
Some of us voyaging within our Hyperspacial travels, encounter another side to reality and concrete physicality, as with an inter-phase with non-material paradigms and alternate frequencies of consciousness. These shifts in awareness open new doors of perception, whereby the witness of self, peeks into other more ethereal or transcendent dimensions (or heretofore hidden strata of reality).
This reveals an altogether different picture of life and living; revealing the essential, underlying interior presence of an immaterial realm, itself existent apart from and within, this physical plane... thus, our prior perceptual structures become most shattered by this counterpoint of the matter which creates our bodies and manifests itself through the ceaseless change of life on this
"third stone from the sun", our planet earth.
The epiphany that most moves me to enrapturement, is the perspective that they are each, on both sides of the looking glass, the very same quintessential energy. It's more a feeling than any type of conceptual formatting. And this has a profound way of dramatically shifting one's focus of attention and one's intent, towards altogether, alternate frequencies and vibratory rates of the inherent patterns of existential being (and yes, many of these are wholly non-physical in nature).
Belief itself, at least ideally, ought to be symbiotic with immediate perception and a meaningful depth of direct understanding. Why believe anything you haven't yourself discovered by yourself, for yourself? This non-ordinary vista should reasonably be based on self-discovery and a perpetual bloom in awakening to interior within interiors... and the immediacy of a direct insight of the aforementioned, immaterial realities available to perceive.
Than being said, we often perceive illusions upon mirages in perception and so, one cannot feasibly always believe what one sees, thinks or intuits... and to some extent, we are forever searching for the truth behind the curtain. The mind is a nearly limitless expanse of potentiality.
But either through cultivation or a natural predisposition, one may intuit a great deal about non-physical states of reality and/or planes of existential being, themselves "spiritual" in their subtle frequency of form and substance. So, in the strictest definition of Spiritus, or Divine Breath... some would argue that you are not spiritually observant until a mystical or religious experience is had.
But IMO, your personal cosmology seems quite "spiritual" to me, as it is all about harmony and balance, two major aspects of what spirituality and it's qualities really mean to the human experience.
Quote:In a very material sense I have firm Ideas of life and death and what happens after. The physical universe is my spirituality - am I misinterpreting spirituality? Am I not spiritual at all?
Again, yes, of course you are... but you may or may not be perceiving the mystical aspect of spirituality. The ineffable, insubstantial and formless aspect of the Godhead. You certainly don't have to believe in God to be a spiritual person. Jains and Buddhists have no conceptual systems of stratified beliefs about a single, Supreme Deity and they are surely spiritual adherents and meditative practitioners. They do, however, believe in largely imperceptible, esoteric levels and degrees of existential being, which can be labeled as nothing short of "spiritual". The same can be said for Taoists and Pantheists.
Admittedly, I say this with the cravat that any
ists and
isms are wholly man-made structures of human belief and not the reality they aim towards. And any theologies are essentially theoretical and are as such, are still an hypothesis. So what's in a name? If one feels a need to label systematic beliefs into definitive, delineated categories, there are huge differences in spiritual cosmology and conceptual context.
Quote:Is spirituality dependent on something numinous or is it something you find inherently full of wonder or awe, or something that somehow justifies your life or makes it fulfilling or interesting? Does it need something more than just this physical realm?
I don't personally believe that one necessarily needs "more than just the physical realm"... there simply are other planes and levels of existence and they are not material in their reality. Even within the gross appearance of materiality, there exists an infinity of empty space... just refer to any pragmatic and procedural field of modern science and this is wholly validated. And as such, if we greatly magnify or reduce our view of the appearance of the physical realm, just enough, we discover other degrees of reality within the paradigm, ordinarily perceivable with the 5 senses and reason.
Quote:What do you think ?
I honestly think that without a mystical or deeply transcendental experience, one does not get the full range of what the "Spiritus" is really all about, multidimensionally. But I maintain that one can surely be spiritual in mindset and in heart, without astral-traveling into alternative planes and parallel dimensions. This can be discovered by simply gazing into the star-filled night skies and observing the beatifically intelligent, galactic splendor of the Milky Way, by standing before the flowing movement and sheer power of the vast ocean, gloriously rhythmical, witness the radiant color-show of sunrise and sunset... or by just quietly watching a mountain brook escalate in it's meandering momentum, until is drops-off suddenly, to morph into a cascading waterfall, rainbows dancing in it's misty spray.
All of this and so much more, creating the most harmonious and beautiful visions for us to see. Spirit surely inhabits all of these miracles and dances throughout their forms as the Tao flows ceaselessly and in ever-changing ways. Invisible perhaps, but immanent and palpable to those who listen and look for it's enigmatic presence.
So, while there is an outer and an inner aspect to "spirituality", I feel spirituality per se, is more an awe-struck attitude of appreciation, it's an attunement in our range of reception. It seems to be more one's own deep appreciation and soulful reflection about the majesty and magnificence of the titanic intelligence and sublime grandeur of the material plane's laws of harmonious continuum, than it is being so much of an ideology about immateriality. Albeit, this is prevalent within most religious and/or philosophical stances.
Again, I believe it it is not a conceptual projection or fixed mind-set, rather, tis quite a cosmic instinct at that, functioning ever-spontaneously through the conscious-awareness of the dynamic subjectivity of the observer. Overall, I proclaim that life is a wholly Sacred phenomenon, in-and-of itself... and so, by way of following through with such clear logic, it is also quite "spiritual".
There is no self to which I cling, for I am one with everything.