Quote:We have actually discussed this before.
Studies were done with LSD. People blind from birth do NOT have " visual hallucinations" while people blind latter in life do. Proper seeing and visual cortex functioning requires input. A lot of learning goes into seeing. It is quite complex and involves associations with language and thus recognition of objects, patterns and boundaries. But even raw visual experience requires sensory input (experience) to properly function. If you are interested look in a neuroscience text book and look at the development of the visual cortex in a newborn.
What would be very interesting to do would be a study utilizing subjects with specific localized neural damage in visual associated cortices (as well as other areas) and administer hallucinogens. Thus we may be able to correlate specific type or forms of hallucinations (or subjective response) with specific regions of the CNS. This study combined with PET, and other imaging studies would be very useful. Some work has been done with subjects with disease induced hallucinations.
I think neuroscience would be in another dimension of knowledge & applications if psychedelics had not been demonized by the gov. back in the 60's and experimentation in humans was allowed to continue.
Shit, it was barely even allowed to get started...And I agree, as much as "
The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" inspired me to "
go Further", I still feel like Keasey & Leary unfortunately did just as much to help tighten the gov's grip on these materials, as anything else they achieved.
Think about it
subjectively.
From the government's square point of view, use of psychedelic drugs
quickly caused these
grown, educated, professional men to "drop out" of
normal society and start either playing
dress-up & acting like children (Keasey's
Merry Pranksters), or performing self experimentation with these
"insanity drugs", on ones own body (Leary's
League for Spiritual Discovery).
That is
lunatic-style thinking from the point of view of the
suit & tie set. Especially back in the 50's-60's when the ties where even tighter around their necks.
Keep in mind that until the 60's, psychedelics & their effects were not widely known in western civilization, they were something only the "
underdeveloped savages living in the jungles down south" dealt with.
And only because they had not heard of god yet. (
jeez...)
Think about western society in the late 50's, early 60's. Black & white & straight as a line! Remember "
Refer Madness"?!?!
Now enter the LSD sub-culture,
day-
glo reds &
greens &
blues, weaving those
previously straight lines into crazy, detailed artwork!!
"
No jobs, dirty & the music these weird hippies make!! That's not music!!!"
Before the cultural revolution of the 60's, it was Perry Como & Laurence Welk etc...
Waltzing music...When psychedelic music hit the air waves, it had to sound like
Satan himself had started a band, to the ears of the
square-masses!!!
Its no wonder the Gov. saw these chemicals as dangerous, seeing as how the people who where taking psychedelics regularly, where realizing how full of shit & meaningless "
$quare $ociety" really is & were learning to live (
happier & more realized) without it!!
Morphane wrote:Do normal people experience sound and smell during a DMT trip? If so, is smell and sound magnified by the drug, as vision is, or do sound and smell remain at conscious levels of intensity?
Yes, a full-on "
breakthrough" is a total transformation of all of your senses to another...dimension/reality/hyperspace...whatever it is, you are there completely, just as you are here, looking at you computer screen right now.
I do not get huge scent hallucinations, but I do get them from time to time. I would have to assume a blind person would have much stronger scent hallucinations, since usually if a person looses their sense of sight, their sense of smell, taste & hearing are amplified to take its place.
My hearing is definitely amplified & transformed while under the influence of DMT!!
If I have any music playing when smoking DMT, I put the volume level at a point where its almost inaudible to my normal hearing. As the effects of that first toke of spice start to seep into my senses, my hearing is instantly amplified & I can hear the music just fine, sometimes it's even too loud!!
However, I much prefer to be in
complete silence when smoking DMT because there is this beautiful,
tryptamine music that one can hear if done in complete silence. Its a kind of hypnotic, double-voiced (
one higher pitched, one lower pitched...) singing/chanting that speeds up & slows down randomly, while also independently changing pitch. The "voice" is accompanied by a chime-like ringing, its all very hypnotic & somehow aids in the transition through the veil.
It's so hard to explain...
I would imagine a blind person would have a much more detailed version of these kinds of
aural hallucinations, indeed.
People who are blind from birth, usually get their perception of the space & depth of the room they're in & the location & size of things
in that room, by listening to the differences between the original sound & the discrete echos of it, pinging off of the walls surrounding them.
So I wonder if the aural hallucinations picked up by a blind person using DMT, would translate into a perception of the
DMT "space"?
Or would it be more of a
void of space (
with nothing physical to echo off of), more so than a person with normal vision could ever experience?
Fascinating topic indeed!!!
WS
All posts are fictional short stories depicting the adventures of WSaged!! None of these events have actually happened and any resemblance to any real persons or incidents is totally coincidence!!!!!!!!!!!!