We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
peyote grafted on peyote Options
 
k3nnyw
#1 Posted : 5/26/2013 9:02:35 AM
DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 17
Joined: 16-Dec-2012
Last visit: 18-Jul-2013
Location: Thailand
has anybody ever grafted peyote on peyote? i've seen pictures of peyote grafted on so many different cacti but never on another peyote cactus. i wanna see how crazy they look lol. i'm gonna buy some soon and grow them and maybe do a little research on grafting. please post pictures!
 

STS is a community for people interested in growing, preserving and researching botanical species, particularly those with remarkable therapeutic and/or psychoactive properties.
 
Michal_R
#2 Posted : 5/26/2013 10:00:55 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 648
Joined: 06-Apr-2012
Last visit: 01-Apr-2017
Location: Old continent
k3nnyw wrote:
has anybody ever grafted peyote on peyote?


No, I haven´t... Confused

Frankly, I can´t see why would anyone want to do that. IMO, people graft peyote on fast growing cacti to speed up the growth of the really slow-growing cactus. I can´t see how grafting peyote on peyote could make the growth faster...

I also think that the constitution of peyote is not really suitable to graft anything onto it Smile
 
moniker
#3 Posted : 5/26/2013 3:33:56 PM

लीला


Posts: 152
Joined: 12-Dec-2012
Last visit: 03-Dec-2013
Location: بابل‎

Yeah, seemingly no logical reason for wanting that. How about grafting one of those flower cactus's to a peyote, that would look crazy too no?
moniker attached the following image(s):
http-inlinethumb34.webshots.com-43169-2652610130104237032S600x600Q85.jpg (51kb) downloaded 29 time(s).
“Music is the voice of God traveling through ten-dimensional hyperspace.”
― Michio Kaku
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.009 seconds.