soulfood wrote:I suppose the only thing this has brought to light is the sentence for possessing this chemical is ridiculous. I could hospitalize someone and get away with it for less.
I suppose the point is that you could hospitalize yourself by awakening a mental disorder or something.
I have a very simple philosophy for personal freedom; I deserve a complete right to my body and mind. I think I should be allowed to do anything I want as long as I don't impinge on the rights of others.
The problem is that this breaks down when you look at it in the context of 'society'. In the society we currently live in we are all bound together by institutions and a central government.
In this kind of society, anti-drug users can say; 'why should we foot the bill for you to do what you want?' This comes back to the point I made in the anti-Joe Rogan thread - if you allow the masses access to powerful chemicals they will undoubtedly abuse them, and someone has to help them right?
(It's worth noting that
we are already footing the bill for alcoholics etc, and that this problem is not only linked to substance abuse, but the whole nature of 'communal care' - i.e for abuse survivors, support for people with disabilities etc).
The answer, in my opinion, is small, collective groups free of overriding institutions. This is why I like Libertarian Socialism. In this group new social contracts can be made and honoured, without any bitterness or prejudice.
The problem I struggle with is how to achieve this? I have become apathetic because I do not see the possibilty for our world to change. In this sense Libertarian Socialism is abstract, it's a collection of ideas rather than a movement. Some can say that it lacks direction because it brings together different types of anarchist, all with different ideas about how to achieve the end goal.
Now that I have realised this my answer is to minimise my contact with society (although not attempt to be completely independent), to use the benefits society gives me, and to primarily look after the concerns of myself and my group of friends.
So far the state hasn't imposed its will on me too strongly and as long as that doesn't happen I'll be reasonably happy. If it does happen then I may be forced to become more active.
Bastard ---> Yes both me and my friend are fans of Chomsky.
"Language is a cracked kettle on which we beat out tunes for bears to dance to, while all the time we long to move the stars to pity." - Flaubert
I do not engage in or condone illegal activities. Most of what I write is on behalf of people I've bumped into, usually several years ago and in countries where the things I mention are legal.