AlbertKLloyd wrote:I am a literal Taoist, in my group we do not venerate Lao Tzu, but for me I will note that you quote the The Hua Hu Ching, many including many Taoists do not believe this is his actual teaching or even actual Taoism. I am among them. It is a good book, but I employ the TaoDeJing's teachings much more extensively.
Kudos to you and your esteemed association. If anything, I am an experiential Taoist, if I were to wear any "Taoist" label at all. I am equally a Buddhist, Parsi, Gnostic, Sufi, Yogi and more than anything else, a Joe Average with a symbiotic relationship with the Infinite Godhead inside of my conscious-awareness.
But I am not any affiliated with any
isms or
ists, I am a person who simply desires to be in tune with the living presence of the indwelling Spirit. To cultivate an awareness of spiritual Gnosis (for lack of a better term). I desire to bloom, as my limited understanding blossoms under the radiance of Divine Mind. We used o call it "Flower Power" when I was a younger person. Such a wonderful time. Open up and say hello to the light!
With this internal yearning, I seek to fuse my spirit-heart with this passing, momentary phenomenon we call existence. Uniting Heaven and Earth. Literal interpretations are NOT the eternal flow of the Tao. They are symbolic gestures of our kind to comprehend the incomprehensible. Just ask the honorable Lao Tzu or Chang Tzu, with or without any veneration offered in their memory.
People are free to venerate or conversely, not to venerate historical personages, artwork, temple complexes, literature or musical pieces. To each their own. And actually, I quoted from the
Tao Te Ching. While I also am familiar with Hua Hu Ching, I didn't reference any statements from it's pages, as there is some reasonable controversy about it's specific authorship, given the loss of the original written form and it being orally passed down for generations of Taoist scholars.
AlbertKLloyd wrote:That goes directly against the Tao as i was taught and believe.
Splendor, Glory, Enthusiasm etc I much prefer: Like a new-born babe before it learns to smile,
I am myself, in awe of the splendor, glory and immensity of the Tao/God/Spirit. New born babies are yet to be taught to be oblivious to the presence of Spirit, so I agree with this sentiment. Your insight echoes Zen master Bankei Yลtaku's famous statement about Buddha-nature and the Unborn / Fu-shล, the "Original Nature" as unconditioned spiritual Reality.
But technically, as bodies and the physical aging process goes, we are not infants. We are wise to utilize intuition, direct intent and spiritual aspiration, to move fluidly within the current of this universal flow. So sure, having no expectation is ideal for the practitioner of mindfulness and even necessary for opening one's singular eye to the Inner Light. Seeing the Light is key to my stance. I don't just think about it or conceptualize it, or merely visualize it's presence, I SEE IT. In exalted states of mind, I merge within it's blinding perfection. And I immerse myself in it's Sacred effulgence, consciously, with intent and merge, willingly so.
I personally believe that for myself, there is no enlightenment without the direct vision of the Inner Light. And I feel "enlightenment" is our core, natural state, we only need to release the mirage. To unlearn the illusory mental constructs we have built. Such membranes block it's eternal presence from our awareness. So, there is an appearance of effort on our parts, absolutely, as we cultivate internal clarity and attunement to the reality behind the appearances.
But I do not declare it is so for all people, as we each have our own experiences. I believe that for myself, the Light of the Godhead is an opening, a portal into the emptiness of the Clear Void. It's not a tail to chase, like a kitten does, nor is it a necessarily a sequential process or a destination. It is for me, an invitation to journey within, although without really moving. It's more of a centering and a beatific pause in my personal drama. In so doing, I recognize my place in the Unified Field, and touch the Sacred fabric of the Divine. To freely participate with the interconnection of all things (seen and unseen).
I only know my own way, as you fine folks know yours. In my deeper center, I am but a witness to this changing play of energy and stasis, the forces of Yin-Yang, mysteriously swirling and spiraling, as it interplays within my mind and heart. I honestly do aspire to remain consciously aware of this effulgence, hidden within all things of this earthy plane. This is not making Spirit "mundane", as you state. I feel that it is making our perception more sensitive to the spiritual essence within all, which we collectivity accept rationally, as being of matter. This is not trivializing the Sacred at all. In my mind, it is praising it's obvious interrelationship within all aspects of itself, of which I am a small part.
Your inner peace may not be kindled from said loving bliss, granted, while mine is, frequently. Your assessment that those who follow the teachings of the Tao lack these experiences, is your own projection. It's delusional to believe your spin on things is the ultimate or more specifically, justifiable motivation to be so fierce and dismissive with other perspectives.
AlbertKLloyd wrote:Inner peace is not from bliss, love or euphoria, for as Tao teaches they are all a side of a coin, so to speak and thus entail their opposites. Love and Hate cannot be separated, joy and sorrow likewise. Some experience life as if it is a wonderful feast to enjoy, but this is not what Tao teaches. It teaches that an attachment to such emotionality is not to be desired or pursued.
IYO, this mode of experience "goes against the Tao". IMO, bliss, love and euphoria are natural byproducts of being in harmony with life and living. Seeing traces of the magik. While not the aim of my practice, it is an unexpected benefit. Why should I deny that I experience them when I am experiencing harmony? Again, use whichever lens of perception suits you, yourself, and I will choose mine own. We are all dreaming... and I value moments of profound awakening. I am exuberant about celebrating such experiences. I am not addicted to trance-states nor addicted to refusing to acknowledge the presence of God and the miracle of life with every beat of my smiling heart and with every breath. Breathing, Spiritus, Spirit, Sight.. Oneness in action is a magnificent, whirling dance, accompanied by the roaring silence, the Song Celestial.
Like all of our dreams, they belong to us but assuredly, they are shaped by our egos. So, I suspect that this is more of a
Lloydist declaration, not so much
Taoist declaration (from what I can glean of it)... and not something I have found within the pages of the Tao Te Ching. I've only been reading translations since 1977, so admittedly, I may be wholly ignorant of it's true teachings. I may well be wrong in suspecting your ideas to be "Lloydist"... but you describe things in your own terms and like most of us, color the teaching with your own interpretations and impressions of the original meanings. We share this trait.
But I feel that it behooves us all not to tell other souls that they are in error because they see and reflect something you do not. And I do not say you err to do so, that would be hypocrisy. I just feel the need to remind you that reality is completely subjective and your style of "raising arguments" is not so enjoyable for me to participate in. Outside of your literal Taoist circle of friends, it may not bear edible fruit, unless one is equally combative.
If ten people look at the full moon, they all describe what they see in unique and different terms. No one is right or wrong, as we all view what we view because we are individuals with unique degrees of understanding of what we perceive. The common ground is where we meet,our need for communication. And one cannot say or imply through behavior, that one vantage point is superior or inferior. Chill out dude. Breathe. LOL
You strongly imply you have a greater understanding of Taoism, even though we all know that the Tao which can be debated on an website is not the eternal Tao. It is merely conceptual chatter. Fine for discussion, though. I feel that there is no for or against the Tao. It defies our grasp, so don't be so much of a know-it-all. I believe that we all get the insights that best facilitate our own internal cultivation. Your predilection for rough and tumble discussions is your cup of tea. I also deeply value the complete silence of any thought and the attunement to the emptiness of the Void. And I almost wish I had kept silent from the very beginning of this cyber-banter. But it started out with a lot of harmonious agreement and sincere, good will.
AlbertKLloyd wrote:Chasing that happy vibe entails depression, it is imbalanced and why it is against Tao.
In my experience, it is not chasing anything, it is SEEING that it is here right now and allowing ourselves to know directly, that we are naught but Divine Being. There is no possibility of being "against the Tao". Seems like that is something the dichotomous mind chooses to quantify. Nor can any being existent apart from the Tao.
IMO nothing goes against the Tao. All is Brahman, there is no coming or going, the journey is the destination. You words and attitude imply you actually know what the Tao is... and what goes against or towards it's enigmatic nature, as an authority of sorts. This is a dream of yours, a state of mind you experience. In this way we are much alike.
What you snidely claim is chasing this vibe... is simple acknowledgement of what already is. Like catching a big wave and enthusiastically surfing with it, freely expressing a natural balance, clam center and intuitive harmony. To merge with the current of the force and direction of the wave. It's not chasing anything, really, it is flowing with the energy. Consciously, intentionally and serenely.
And in my experience of the universal current, it is a joyous realization to know one's unity with said current. But this doesn't mean we don't seek to cultivate a sensitivity to perceiving of the living essence. Nor is training unnecessary for our cultivation. Again, as Alan Watts said so beautifully,
"It's like trying not to try." The cosmic oxymoron in motion.
I believe this is where your take of all of this stuff and mine are radically different. That's cool, if we all agreed wholly, we would just be parroting each other and that's not what you want here. You really seem enjoy debating and bantering. I propose the concept that acceptance is equally worthwhile and for some modicum agreement between alternate perceptions, there needs to be some kind of effort to meet harmoniously in a middle ground of sorts. It's called mutual respect, brother.
You may find that your method in communications may also weed me out of this contrary thread, as well? Your "conduct and thoughts" mirror much of this possibility, as well as my continued interest in finding common ground betwixt the friction raised by such diverse vantage points. Yada, yada, yada... เฅ
Be well, be clear, be centered and keep on being yourself. There is no self to which I cling, for I am one with everything.