Lagomorph wrote:I disagree, and I think you contradict yourself.
On the one hand, you concede that shamanism "is a profession. Like a fisherman, a basket weaver or a blacksmith. It's a job. Like any job in which trade specific knowledge is passed down to apprentices, you excel at it."
I never said it was a profession. Don't know where you got that?
It is a practice with the intent to better understand & work the psyche. For
good or for bad. There may be different methods & traditions, but the basic intention remains the same: To better understand & influence the psyche. New, younger traditions
are NOT nececairily void of meaning or less worthy, allthough I defenitely agree Ayahuasca is being abused by many with impure, counter-shamanic intentions. But one can still become a great shaman without learning it from ancient traditions. I consider myself a syncretist: I am inspired by many, old traditions, but I feel compelled to pick them apart and put them in my own context.
Lagomorph wrote:
But you want us to conclude that "we all can embody the role of the shaman" as if doing so doesn't take periods of dedicated training and learning the specific knowledge and skills that make up the profession. This is like saying "we all can embody the role of the M.D." Well, sure, if you go through medical school successfully.
Yet again you are putting words in my mouth. Your interpretation is very far from what I meant. I never said it is for just anyone. I mentioned a very specific intent & set of skills and, although they are basic, they are very much key to becomming a good shaman.
Without those intentions & basic skills you're likely to become a bad shaman. So no it's not for everybody.
Lagomorph wrote:
And that's assuming your assertion that shamanism is "like any [other] job". However, my understanding is that being a shaman is UNLIKE being a medical doctor or "any [other] job" in that it is not really something one chooses but rather that one is chosen for, or called to. To the extent that that is true, no, not "all" can really "embody the role of the shaman".
Finally, you seem to have very narrow assumptions about what shamanism is and how it works. You seem to assume that the main skill behind shamanism is stage magic and performance, and that its effectiveness is a result of "suggestion" to the mind. Unless you are a trained and effective shaman explaining your own understanding of what you do... this seems like an oversimplified western interpretation of something that originates from totally different cosmologies than our own.
I agree that it's difficult for us to understand the role & function of a shaman... but the flip side to romanticizing that role is dismissing that role. Both occur from our own lack of understanding. Both strike me as a mistake.
I am amazed by your hostility. And by how you completely misinterpret my words. According to you I equated Shamanism to stage magicn & performance.
I never said any such thing you grabbed that completely out of the air.
Could be me, but from where I'm sitting your response seems completely inappropriate(actually outright rude) & uncalled for.
To simplify what I said about a shaman's role:
The intent to help understand & heal the psyche of oneself & others. To be able to
remain stable & of pure intentions whilst helping clients, even when these clients
are overflowing with instability & impure intentions.
I completely fail to understand how you interpretted that as me thinking Shamans
are stage magicians.
I DO think to be a good Shaman requires a certain type of talented & skilled people.
It's not just for anyone. But there are ALOT of people with Shaman-talent who have
no cultural connection to ancient Shamanic traditions at all.
When I say people with Shaman talents & aspirations I CLEARLY do no mean douchebags who would use Ayahuasca to seduce women or start a little cult to become revered.
These are clearly impure, egoic intentions aspiring hedonism & power.
I mean people who genuinly, selflessly want to help people, without seeking sexual pleasure, , financial gain or power from/over them. Many aspiring shamans fail to get their priorities
straight, but there are certainly aspiring shamans with Pure intentions & impressive skills.
They may lack the knowledge that ancient traditions had, but they are on a right path.
What I was saying was that these people with talent, pure inentions & aspirations for Shamanism should NOT feel unworthy of founding their own Shamanic tradition.
Besides, what is really left of these ancient traditions & how hard is it to get in on that knowledge nowadays?
If new aspiring shamans don't start new traditions, Shamanism may disappear all together.