ragabr wrote:rising spirit, I hope this isn't considered a derail, but any thoughts on the white out bliss experiences which are not accompanied by a sense of presence or divinity?
Sorry about the long gap in my response to your comment,
ragabr. And no, your question is not at all a derail, it is a perfectly reasonable query to raise. That being said, I must confess that any reply I offer, is born of my own direct experiences and I don't presuppose that every other soul in this universe would share complete symmetry within every detail of it's transmission. Only a fool or an ass would have this type of inflexible mental stance.
IMO, it is not a 'whiteout' unless it is accompanied by the overpowering vision of the light. Hence, the term
enlightenment. This, more than anything, is what distinguishes it from a blackout. It is not a type of unconsciousness, it is a non-dual state of supraconsciousness. In classic terms of definition, it occurs when the psyche becomes infused and engulfed by the blinding light of the Indivisible Spirit. It might also be labeled the
Light of Infinity, for it's brilliance dissolves all differences and unites our awareness within it's frequency of sublime vibration.
Such an immersion shatters our conditioned modality of mental focus and allows for the pure experience of awareness. The accompanying vision of the
white light, is more than an optical perception, it is a profound degree of understanding. An understanding of the Omniscience of all being. This is what religious visionaries call,
The Truth. The all-pervasive unity of existence in general and on a more personal level, the union of self and Self (AKA the Godhead).
This is the said to be the root cause for my propensity for using the term
Omniself. It could just as easily be called
Uniself,
Non-self or
Anti-self (depending on how one views the nature of self in juxtaposition to Deity). Sages have enjoyed playing with this irony for millenniums now.
Sri Ramana Maharshi wrote:The Atman is Self-effulgent. One need give it no mental picture, anyway. The thought that imagines itself, is existing in bondage. Because the Self is the effulgence transcending the darkness of dreams and the light of Truth. One should not think of it with the mind. Such imagination will find it's endpoint in further bondage, whereas the Spirit is spontaneously shining as the Absolute Consciousnesss.
I believe we are One. That we are all aspects of a God, which is beyond the shadow of a doubt,
not an anthropomorphic deification but a unified field (or plane) of indivisible consciousness. The raw awareness which exists before mind was given ground to think, by the Creator. Incarnating as we do, within a pattern of organic behavioral mechanisms (each relative to our capacity to perceive levels of reality), we begin to reach beyond our biology into the expanse of the exponential potentiality of possibilities in awareness.
Suddenly stripped of subjectivity, shattered by the force of the All... we are woven within a web of Spirit. As earthlings, we have certain mutually agreed upon parameters which define consensus 'reality'. The construct of ego, however, is a seeming illusory phenomenon and exists in isolation from the Source Current. In our spiritual awakening, is the light of this fundamental understanding which fashions our ideologies, however flavored by our unique personalities and proclivities.
Not awareness as is centered on the dynamic of subject-and-object, I must reiterate, but the awareness of the indescribable essence of the Oneness. Only upon the approach towards a total symbiosis with this Force and just post-peak of this attunement to such a current, does the witness have the capacity to frame the immensity of such a level of consciousness (within the proclivity and ideology of the tendencies of said observer). During the fusion of self and God, thought cannot exist, as thought is a mechanism of duality. :idea:
One may perceive the supraconscious plane, in which these realizations are born, as
Divine, or for that matter, as not Divine. By 'not Divine', I mean to say that if
ALL IS ONE and thus, by strict definition Divine... what then is not Divine? Therefore, nothing is an isolated degree of certainty, as all is Indivisible and no polarities truly exist within the unified web of Omni-awareness. This is why the insubstantial nature of the unmanifested source is so shrouded in complete mystery. In unity, all things lose separate definitions and reveal themselves as a silent void of constancy of form or definition of characteristic.
So, yes I would imagine it quite possible to experience a
whiteout and have no impressions of this being a Spiritual phenomenon or indicating a direct presence of Divinity, if one's mental framework was such that the transcendent was colored by the ideal of insubstantiality. With such an outlook, the bliss of the whiteout may stem from the absence of duality. This is what the Indian philosophy of Advaita is all about. The unified, unpolarized state of being. The bliss emerges out of the freedom which this union elicits within the soul of the Dreamer.
I propose the concept that when we attempt to encapsulate the immersion with distinctive form or point of reference, we are doing so from our return to an isolated and disconnected witness. This strongly implies that awareness persists without thought or even any certainty of self.
One step beyond and above this level, nothing can be spoken of. It can be experienced and gradually integrated within one's individuated soul but the state of
no mind is transcendent of polarity. I label this as 'Divine', simply because this force is so immeasurably intelligent and within it's innate indivisibility, beyond the grasp of mind or intellect.
Again, this thread is about the inner vision of the
white light and I feel most certain that this would be translated slightly differently, by any number of individuals having such a peak experience. As much of what we speak of, when we raise questions about the reality of God or the awakening of a soul towards 'Cosmic Consciousness'... is limited by the system of semantics utilized to give voice to our logical deductions and philosophical assertions. I maintain the idea that we are each created to have unique perceptions and equally unique ideas about the presence or lack of presence, of a Divine Being.
As I cannot find the words to describe the indescribable... I often fall back on applying the use of traditional colloquialisms such as God, Divinity, Spirit or simply as,
The Clear Light of the Void. The implication is aimed decidedly towards a state in which the fusion of an individuals interphase with
supraconsciousness, within the Oneness, appears to encompasses all that exists. This is further speculated from the human vantage point, that this plane is the immaterial source, interior blueprint... and essential causative source for all being.
The truth of the matter is always paradoxical. For when we perceive that everything is God and therefore, nothing is not God... God ceases to exist as some Supreme, anthropomorphic deity and is without containment ans so, seen as immanent and the very awareness behind the myriad minds emerging out of nonexistence. Which, in and of itself, points back to a divine presence and only seems so from this side of
The Looking Glass. In direct conscious union and the, cessation of mind... all is Void.
You tell me,
ragabr, do you have this blissful whiteout experience without a sense of a Divine Order to the universe or a higher intelligence? Do you see the interconnectedness of the Grid and melt into it's expansive being? I am curious for you to clarify your perspective and I find your input most fascinating.
There is no self to which I cling, for I am one with everything.