We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
NPR: Pure Ecstasy Is Safe, Canadian Doctor Says, But Don't Buy 'E' On The Street Options
 
a1pha
#1 Posted : 6/15/2012 12:09:13 AM


Moderator | Skills: Master hacker!

Posts: 3830
Joined: 12-Feb-2009
Last visit: 08-Feb-2024
NPR: Pure Ecstasy Is Safe, Canadian Doctor Says, But Don't Buy 'E' On The Street

As far as recreational drugs that could have health benefits go, ecstasy doesn't exactly have a lot of champions. Instead, the drug, so often associated with raves, has been fingered as responsible for fatal overdoses, depression and problems in fetal development.

So it comes as a bit of a surprise that the chief health officer of British Columbia said today that ecstasy, or MDMA, is safe for consumption and may not have negative long-term health effects. But the official, Dr. Perry Kendall, who gave interviews to several Canadian media outlets, wants to be clear about one thing: There is a big difference between pure ecstasy and the stuff that gets cut with other chemicals and makes up the vast majority of what's sold on the street.

In other words, don't go running out onto the street in search of "E."


"Unless you are getting it from a psychiatrist in a legitimate clinical trial, at the present time, you can't guarantee what's in it, how much there is, or its safety, so I would say, as we have said in the past: Don't take it," Kendall told CBC News.

As you might have inferred, ecstasy is indeed being given to volunteers in clinical settings. For that matter, so is ketamine, a club drug also known as "Special K" that's shown promise in treating severe depression, as NPR's Jon Hamilton has reported.

Still, it's hard to imagine an American health official making such a pronouncement. But Canada has long had a more lenient attitude toward drugs. Vancouver's city council is currently debating marijuana decriminalization; advocates for decriminalization say the illegal drug trade fuels violence in the city.

Kendall told media outlets that if ecstasy were legalized, it would also take control out of the hands of criminals and give the government the chance to regulate the trade.

"[If] you knew what a safe dosage was, you might be able to buy ecstasy like you could buy alcohol from a government-regulated store," Kendall told Canada's National Post in an interview.

Kendall isn't the first health expert to defend the safety of pure MDMA.

Michael Mithoefer, an associate clinical professor of surgery at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, uses MDMA to treat post-traumatic stress disorder. "There's quite a bit of phase one safety data from studies in the United States and Europe, using doses [of pure MDMA] similar to the ones we're using under medical supervision ... that have shown that [the drug] can be safely administered in that kind of situation," Mithoefer told Tell Me More's Michel Martin in 2007.

And as we've reported, David Nichols, a Purdue University pharmacologist, has also looked at various pharmacological uses for ecstasy. He began his research in the 1980s, before anyone had even heard of it.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." -A.Huxley
 

Live plants. Sustainable, ethically sourced, native American owned.
 
jamie
#2 Posted : 6/15/2012 1:04:18 AM

DMT-Nexus member

Salvia divinorum expert | Skills: Plant growing, Ayahuasca brewing, Mushroom growingSenior Member | Skills: Plant growing, Ayahuasca brewing, Mushroom growing

Posts: 12340
Joined: 12-Nov-2008
Last visit: 02-Apr-2023
Location: pacific
yeah I never had any negative effects the day after using pure crystal..I never took it many times but I never felt it was a toxic thing.
Long live the unwoke.
 
Nicita
#3 Posted : 6/15/2012 1:21:17 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 194
Joined: 31-May-2012
Last visit: 12-Jul-2023
Read Shulgins' PIHKAL & TIHKAL! Both Shura and his wife advocate MADMA as one of the safest psychedelic drugs with an imense therapeutical potential. In TIHKAL Ann Shulgin describes her work together with a psychiatrist using MDMA. For example, she describes a patient where a single session using MDMA revealed an repressed traumatic event in his childhood which was responsible fora current psychological illness resulting in physical pain.
The term for MDMA used by the Shulgins is entactogen. It has no halluzinogenic proberties but rather opens up to the people around you, your environment and yourself. Both Ann and Shura consequently emphasise the great proberties of this substance, linked to really low risk compared to many other drugs. All in all, there is much valuable information in these two books.

Personally I have no experience with MDMA, mainly because of the mentioned insecureties regarding the purity and quality of E sold today. I would estimate that there is a much greater chance of getting somthing containing any unknown RC from a chinalab than to stumble accross good quality MDMA. If I had a good source, I wouldn't hesitate to seek this great experience!
 
benzyme
#4 Posted : 6/15/2012 1:57:47 AM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 09-Aug-2025
Location: the lab
i'm not convinced that mdma isn't neurotoxic, even pure mdma can erode fine axons in the raphe nuclei
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
jamie
#5 Posted : 6/15/2012 2:03:19 AM

DMT-Nexus member

Salvia divinorum expert | Skills: Plant growing, Ayahuasca brewing, Mushroom growingSenior Member | Skills: Plant growing, Ayahuasca brewing, Mushroom growing

Posts: 12340
Joined: 12-Nov-2008
Last visit: 02-Apr-2023
Location: pacific
benzyme wrote:
i'm not convinced that mdma isn't neurotoxic, even pure mdma can erode fine axons in the raphe nuclei


Can you link a source?

Not that I care. I will most likely never take MDMA again but the information is interesting.
Long live the unwoke.
 
a1pha
#6 Posted : 6/15/2012 2:05:44 AM


Moderator | Skills: Master hacker!

Posts: 3830
Joined: 12-Feb-2009
Last visit: 08-Feb-2024
jamie wrote:
benzyme wrote:
i'm not convinced that mdma isn't neurotoxic, even pure mdma can erode fine axons in the raphe nuclei


Can you link a source?

http://www.springerlink....ontent/x1u43351l2n1517t/
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." -A.Huxley
 
Psyren
#7 Posted : 6/15/2012 2:30:03 AM

d(^_^)b


Posts: 202
Joined: 08-Jun-2011
Last visit: 04-Oct-2013
Location: Dark side of the Sun
Sil wrote:
Wow, what an interesting find. I've never tried E personally myself but I've heard from friends who have and they've said it's quite the experience, a very touch-feel intensive trip.

It's very interesting to see the account of a physician that this drug is safe in controlled environments and situations. I wonder what benefits it would have to offer with its consumption? I've never had any experience with this substance personally so it'll be interesting to hear future developments on this!

Very interesting article, a1pha! Smile


I hope that one day you can experience pure MDMA.

And about it being neurotoxic, maybe. But if you dont plan on making it a habit i dont really see the danger.
Seek not abroad, turn back into thyself, for in the inner man dwells the truth.
 
benzyme
#8 Posted : 6/15/2012 6:24:27 AM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 09-Aug-2025
Location: the lab
a1pha wrote:
jamie wrote:
benzyme wrote:
i'm not convinced that mdma isn't neurotoxic, even pure mdma can erode fine axons in the raphe nuclei


Can you link a source?

http://www.springerlink....ontent/x1u43351l2n1517t


http://www.jneurosci.org...ntent/8/8/2788.full.pdf

it's also cited in The Biochemical Basis of Neuropharmacology, 3rd Ed. (chapter on Serotonin).


you've all heard it before: everything in moderation.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
Purges
#9 Posted : 6/15/2012 11:02:42 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 1999
Joined: 13-Jun-2011
Last visit: 24-Jun-2018
I am sure that I have done some irreversible damage from my old pill munching days... But then it was 'street' E / MDMA, and I did mix it with all sorts, and on a regular basis... Like Benz says, be sensible, be moderate, you'll be fine...
Lose Control, Free My Soul, Break Me Open, Make Me Whole.
"DMT kicked my balls off" - od3
 
christian
#10 Posted : 6/15/2012 12:44:21 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 1824
Joined: 31-Jan-2011
Last visit: 05-Apr-2014
Location: paradise
Pure Mdma is reckoned to have immence use as a therapeutic tool. It may be reasonably safe, and even if it's neurotoxic one would have to add up the benefit over damage scale of things.

Surely if it can transform peoples lives to change for the better in a single session or two, then nothing bad should be said about such a thing. The world needs positive cheerful individuals, not a miserable lost population. Surely the last is toxicity embodied??

The trouble with some research is that it nitpicks on minor details, but does not look at the greater good. Because of this humanity is being held back because of a small minded way of thinking.
"Eat your vegetables and do as you're told, or you won't be going to the funfair!"
 
benzyme
#11 Posted : 6/15/2012 3:37:32 PM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 09-Aug-2025
Location: the lab
yes, we all know your misguided view of science, as is evident in some of your posts. the fact of the matter is, some compounds like MDMA and 3,4-DMPEA, are known neurotoxins, they cause damage through their structure-function attributes (ligand-receptor), not some agenda of science to suppress human happiness. I find it rather amusing that people would consume MDMA and not even think about MDMA neurotoxicity, passing it off as some conspiracy or myth, yet have an alarmist attitude with respect to petrochemicals.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
Shaolin
#12 Posted : 6/15/2012 3:59:39 PM

Stiletto Stoner

Moderator

Posts: 1132
Joined: 18-Nov-2008
Last visit: 15-Mar-2015
Location: Blazin'
TheStar wrote:

Dr. Perry Kendall stands behind his controversial comments that taking pure ecstasy can be safe.

But B.C.’s chief provincial health officer says he is not advocating for the drug to be legalized and sold in stores, as stated in a previous story.

“I was asked a hypothetical question, which was that if those drugs were to be legalized, what would be the best way of doing it,” he said in an interview Thursday.

Kendall says Canada should instead look at an “evidence-based way” of regulating and controlling psychoactive substances.

“Let’s look at what works and what doesn’t work. Let’s look at what harms of various drugs are and compare them. And let’s look at the impacts of the policies on a drug use,” he said.

“We should be looking at a regulatory regime that is more evidence-based than the current one and decide as a society how we want to control these drugs, given that the current control is not optimal, in my opinion.”

A spokesman for Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq issued a statement in response to the story and Kendall’s clarification.

“Our government is not contemplating any changes that would make ecstasy legal, so we have no further comment to make at this time,” said spokesman Steve Outhouse.

Kendall reiterated that taking MDMA, a pharmaceutically pure product known as ecstasy in its street form, under the right circumstances and in non-toxic dosages can treat conditions such as post traumatic stress disorder.

He compared the substance with alcohol, which is legal, but can cause death if abused.

“We allow people to get intoxicated with alcohol. A bottle of vodka can kill you very easily, if you swallow the whole bottle. It’s addictive,” he said.

He admitted, that if legalized, MDMA would likely be used recreationally, but added that alcohol is arguably more dangerous.

“What is fundamentally the difference between that and a psychoactive substance that makes people feel good and gives them some energy, which as far as we know isn’t addictive, doesn’t cause cancer, doesn’t destroy the brain?” he asked.

The RCMP in B.C., who have a team dedicated to dismantling clandestine drug labs, maintain no amount of the substance is safe.

The medical literature says that MDMA sends waves of serotonin flooding through the brain. The natural brain chemical makes people feel happy, social and intimate with others.

According to Toronto’s Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, MDMA carries a list of potential health effects that include teeth grinding, sweating, increased blood pressure and heart rate, anxiety, blurred vision, nausea, vomiting and convulsions, even at low doses.

The medical establishment widely agrees MDMA is not addictive and new research suggests some of the drug’s long-stated ill effects are exaggerated.

MDMA was criminalized in Canada in 1976 and in the U.S. 1985. It was recently boosted to the top of Canada’s drug scheduling list under the federal government’s omnibus crime bill, meaning it carries penalties similar to those for cocaine and heroin.

With files from the Canadian Press

http://www.thestar.com/n...ores-b-c-health-officer

Isn't it strange how RCMP (The Royal Canadian Mounted Police) are portrayed as experts on pharmacology.
Got GVG ? Mhm. Got DMT ?

Pandora wrote:
Nexus enjoys cutting edge and ongoing superior programming skills of the owner of this site (The Traveler), including recent switching to the .me domain name.


I'm still, I'm still Jenny from the block

Simon Jester wrote:
"WTF n00b, buy the $100 vapor pipe or GTFO"


Ignorance of the law does not protect you from prosecution
 
benzyme
#13 Posted : 6/15/2012 4:14:53 PM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 09-Aug-2025
Location: the lab
very, but not surprising. The Canadian gov't had already come out on record, admitting that Canada was the largest supplier of MDMA to the US
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
Shaolin
#14 Posted : 6/15/2012 4:20:08 PM

Stiletto Stoner

Moderator

Posts: 1132
Joined: 18-Nov-2008
Last visit: 15-Mar-2015
Location: Blazin'
benzyme wrote:
http://www.jneurosci.org/content/8/8/2788.full.pdf


How does the regime* of the study affect the conclusions ? It seems very unreleastic to me that a human would use MDMA in such amounts, frequency and ROA, and as such any conclusions seem at best a hypothesis.

*20 mg/kg, twice daily for 4 days
Got GVG ? Mhm. Got DMT ?

Pandora wrote:
Nexus enjoys cutting edge and ongoing superior programming skills of the owner of this site (The Traveler), including recent switching to the .me domain name.


I'm still, I'm still Jenny from the block

Simon Jester wrote:
"WTF n00b, buy the $100 vapor pipe or GTFO"


Ignorance of the law does not protect you from prosecution
 
benzyme
#15 Posted : 6/15/2012 4:28:49 PM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 09-Aug-2025
Location: the lab
aha! now you're questioning...that's good.
obviously, no reasonable human would consume those doses (excluding E-tards)

obviously, low doses won't have that sort of degeneration, and may have therapeutic value.
then again, so would a hobby.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
jamie
#16 Posted : 6/15/2012 5:31:10 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Salvia divinorum expert | Skills: Plant growing, Ayahuasca brewing, Mushroom growingSenior Member | Skills: Plant growing, Ayahuasca brewing, Mushroom growing

Posts: 12340
Joined: 12-Nov-2008
Last visit: 02-Apr-2023
Location: pacific
Shaolin wrote:
TheStar wrote:

Dr. Perry Kendall stands behind his controversial comments that taking pure ecstasy can be safe.

But B.C.’s chief provincial health officer says he is not advocating for the drug to be legalized and sold in stores, as stated in a previous story.

“I was asked a hypothetical question, which was that if those drugs were to be legalized, what would be the best way of doing it,” he said in an interview Thursday.

Kendall says Canada should instead look at an “evidence-based way” of regulating and controlling psychoactive substances.

“Let’s look at what works and what doesn’t work. Let’s look at what harms of various drugs are and compare them. And let’s look at the impacts of the policies on a drug use,” he said.

“We should be looking at a regulatory regime that is more evidence-based than the current one and decide as a society how we want to control these drugs, given that the current control is not optimal, in my opinion.”

A spokesman for Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq issued a statement in response to the story and Kendall’s clarification.

“Our government is not contemplating any changes that would make ecstasy legal, so we have no further comment to make at this time,” said spokesman Steve Outhouse.

Kendall reiterated that taking MDMA, a pharmaceutically pure product known as ecstasy in its street form, under the right circumstances and in non-toxic dosages can treat conditions such as post traumatic stress disorder.

He compared the substance with alcohol, which is legal, but can cause death if abused.

“We allow people to get intoxicated with alcohol. A bottle of vodka can kill you very easily, if you swallow the whole bottle. It’s addictive,” he said.

He admitted, that if legalized, MDMA would likely be used recreationally, but added that alcohol is arguably more dangerous.

“What is fundamentally the difference between that and a psychoactive substance that makes people feel good and gives them some energy, which as far as we know isn’t addictive, doesn’t cause cancer, doesn’t destroy the brain?” he asked.

The RCMP in B.C., who have a team dedicated to dismantling clandestine drug labs, maintain no amount of the substance is safe.

The medical literature says that MDMA sends waves of serotonin flooding through the brain. The natural brain chemical makes people feel happy, social and intimate with others.

According to Toronto’s Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, MDMA carries a list of potential health effects that include teeth grinding, sweating, increased blood pressure and heart rate, anxiety, blurred vision, nausea, vomiting and convulsions, even at low doses.

The medical establishment widely agrees MDMA is not addictive and new research suggests some of the drug’s long-stated ill effects are exaggerated.

MDMA was criminalized in Canada in 1976 and in the U.S. 1985. It was recently boosted to the top of Canada’s drug scheduling list under the federal government’s omnibus crime bill, meaning it carries penalties similar to those for cocaine and heroin.

With files from the Canadian Press

http://www.thestar.com/n...ores-b-c-health-officer

Isn't it strange how RCMP (The Royal Canadian Police) are portrayed as experts on pharmacology.


Shaolin, you are talking about guys that still ride around in collonial uniforms, on horseback in the middle of downtown Smile ..the RCMP is a joke and one of the most corrupt organizations in Canada. They honestly have not proven to be experts at anything other than oppressing people.
Long live the unwoke.
 
ouro
#17 Posted : 6/15/2012 6:19:52 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 596
Joined: 09-Sep-2010
Last visit: 25-Mar-2024
benzyme wrote:
a1pha wrote:
jamie wrote:
benzyme wrote:
i'm not convinced that mdma isn't neurotoxic, even pure mdma can erode fine axons in the raphe nuclei


Can you link a source?

http://www.springerlink....ontent/x1u43351l2n1517t


http://www.jneurosci.org...ntent/8/8/2788.full.pdf

it's also cited in The Biochemical Basis of Neuropharmacology, 3rd Ed. (chapter on Serotonin).


you've all heard it before: everything in moderation.



The first article cited here says that there was serotonin depletion but no neurotoxicity at a dose of 10-20 mg / kg, and the second says there was damage to 5ht axons after 20 mg/kg dose, twice a day for 4 days. That dose is totally absurd. Of course a rat brain isnt a perfect model for a human, but if you scale those doses, they are so large the study loses most of its usefulness imo. I think a normal human dose is like 100 mg? for a 70 kg person thats a dose of around 1-2 mg / kg. the poison is in the dose.
 
polytrip
#18 Posted : 6/15/2012 6:54:26 PM
DMT-Nexus member

Senior Member

Posts: 4639
Joined: 16-May-2008
Last visit: 24-Dec-2012
Location: A speck of dust in endless space, like everyone else.
ouro wrote:
benzyme wrote:
a1pha wrote:
jamie wrote:
benzyme wrote:
i'm not convinced that mdma isn't neurotoxic, even pure mdma can erode fine axons in the raphe nuclei


Can you link a source?

http://www.springerlink....ontent/x1u43351l2n1517t


http://www.jneurosci.org...ntent/8/8/2788.full.pdf

it's also cited in The Biochemical Basis of Neuropharmacology, 3rd Ed. (chapter on Serotonin).


you've all heard it before: everything in moderation.



The first article cited here says that there was serotonin depletion but no neurotoxicity at a dose of 10-20 mg / kg, and the second says there was damage to 5ht axons after 20 mg/kg dose, twice a day for 4 days. That dose is totally absurd. Of course a rat brain isnt a perfect model for a human, but if you scale those doses, they are so large the study loses most of its usefulness imo. I think a normal human dose is like 100 mg? for a 70 kg person thats a dose of around 1-2 mg / kg. the poison is in the dose.

I´ve seen people taking 7 pills at once....I know, that´s just asking for trouble. But then you have this shulgin guy telling the media that using breadwrappers or aluminium foil is potentially worse for your health than using MDMA on a frequent basis. So the kids think:'the scientist says it´s alright, so i can take as many of that stuff as i like'.

Therefore these kinds of research aren´t completely futile. Helps thinning out the list of yearly nominees for the darwin-awards...hopefully.
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest (2)

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.123 seconds.