staresatwalls wrote:i find attributing rediscovery of the psychedelic mushroom to be trivial and fruitless after a while b/c there were most likely many westerners before them, and before them (albeit probably undocumented)that "rediscovered" it back to when they were "common" knowledge. i hate having to use obtuse terms to hide my ignorance. thank god for people like jan irvin for doing the research so many of us are too lazy to do.
It has to be documented for it to count.
There was a time lapse between the last documented mention of mushroom usage among indigenous peoples by the Spaniards in which the mushrooms were not only forgotten in the mind of the West but academia went as far as to say that the mushrooms of Mesoamerican Indians never existed in the first place (W. E. Safford 1915) and that instead Franciscian Friars misidentified the specimens as the tops of
Lophophora Williamsii. Robert Weitleiner sounded the horn in a way, being the first outsider on record to touch the mushrooms, but his samples were not in satisfactory condition for analysis (Weitlaner 1936). Reko's objections led him to search Oaxaca and in 1938, with Schultes, obtained botanical specimens of
teonanacatl' which turned out to represent three species.
1915 - Safford publishes his theory and it gains popularity in academia.
1936 - Weitlaner sends unidentifiable samples to Farlow Herbarium
1938 - Reko & Schultes collect what turned out to be three species of teonanacatl'
1939 - Irmgard Weitlaner-Johnson and J. B. Johnson in Hautla become first outsiders to witness valeda.
1939 - Carl Stantesson receives samples from Reko and performs chemical extracts on frogs and mice.
World War II now interferes and research basically drops off here for another 16 years before Wasson and Richardson get the goods in Oaxaca. As to technical breeches between Reko/Weitlaner being the true "pioneer of rediscovery", you decide.