Yes, a million times yes. It always seems to come back to that to be honest.
Regardless of whatever you think about David Icke, in one of his lectures he puts up a slide that says: "Love is not something your in, it's something you ARE!" I've found this to be the case in my own personal explorations.
On my most recent mushroom experience with my lady, we were melting in a sea of our own love as we held each other. In that state of mind I said to her "I hope the last thing I ever say is that I love you". At that second, it was like a million fireworks and bells went off from hyperspace and I felt like I was home. I then had a direct revelation that love is the fractal that composes all of hyperspace. No matter how it's expressed it always ends the same way: love.
Love is the transcendental object at the end of history; Terence's proverbial eschaton that sends shockwaves of itself backwards into time. Think about that. What on earth is capable of more love than a human organism? Were our single celled ancestors capable of the acts of love we are capable of? Yet as evolution continued to move forward, it brought about more complexity and more complexity until it created beings that WERE capable of love, which is what this game has always been about! It HAS to end in love because that's all there is.
Love is Terence's attractor at the end of history. It's as if before this universe was every created, the end result was already known. Since love is all that exists, its what every story ends in. The details of each individual story can vary to an extreme degree, but it HAS to end the same. The ending is always the same because that's all there is. To write the story of HOW the universe got to that stage, well there you have everything that WE currently know about the cosmos. It started in a tiny dense state (chapter one of our story), exploded, then matter formed over time (chapter 2). Things became more interconnected until planets formed (chapter 3), then life (chapter 4), then sentient life (chapter 5). So what then becomes the goal of sentient life other than love? Is this not, in reality, the driving force of each and every one of us? Are we not almost insane about it? Isn't our collective sickness about this when we really look at it?
It's paradoxical really because we are love trying to find love in a story about love, and yet we still have such a hard time finding it! Unfortunately (and I use that term very loosely), I think that that's all conciousness knows how to do. It can create an infinate amount of stories which we can call realities but it can't change the basic premise of the story. Love is what it is, thus making it a closed system like the physicist Tom Campbell talks about. Love can't know what it is for itself; it needs a way to be expressed. Ever done Terence's famous mushroom experiment? He recommended asking the Logos "Who are you for yourself?" Ever done it? I have and it's incredibly peculiar. Whatever the Logos is, it has NO IDEA what it is for itself!! This is both a very sad notion and an incredibly joyful one depending on how you look at it. Knowing not what it is for itself, it's infinate in it's self expression. However it goes on without end because it can't define itself any other way, so there is no rest for it really.
Love is also energy, and what do we know about energy? It can't be created or destroyed. Scientists say that the amount of energy in the universe hasn't increased or decreased since the big bang, it's just spread out and compacted in certain areas into dense energy which we call matter. So you have this closed system with a certain amount of energetic (love) input into it. Then it explodes outward and scatters in a million directions. The natural tendency of this energy is to come back to itself, to find itself and bond with itself. Yet the opposite is true for the laws of this universe where entropy is the rule, or chaos. So you have love in a battle against entropy in a closed system of our universe. There is our set and setting for the particular story we find ourselves in.
I say that the tendecy of this energy we call love is to come back to itself just because of the common way we all understand love as something that connects rather that destabilizes. If we can accept this in theory, think about Terence's concept of the universe being a novelty conserving engine. The universe seems to want to create more and more complexity; unity towards complexity. There is no scientific reason for WHY the universe should behave in this manner. Entropy would suggest that the universe SHOULD NOT create more and more complexity, and yet it does in almost every situation we look. We should ask ourselves why this is.
I dunno, that was a lot of garbage I just spewed forth. It's my understanding of love. Love IS hyperspace, which is you, because it's all that exists. Fear and hate aren't really real in any eternal sense, so they are subject to the law of entropy. Really just think about how true that is. Fear and hate lead to destruction, which is entropy. A universe where the primary law is entropic would destroy itself and be nothing. Love builds to infinate levels of complexity (I mean, have you SEEN the objects the elves sing into existence? They literally RADIATE love, at least in my experience).
Love seems to be the medium out of which EVERYTHING else exists. Your level of enlightenment or self awareness directly relates to how SURE you are of this fact.
Again, my own personal understanding don't take it as a fact but if you jive on what I'm saying I think you know where I'm coming from.
All posts are from the fictional perspective of The Legendary Tek: the formless, hyperspace exploring apprentice to the mushroom god Teo. Tek, the lord of Eureeka's Castle, is the chosen one who has surfed the rainbow wave and who resides underneath the matter dome. All posts are fictitious in nature and are meant for entertainment purposes only.