Macrogonus can be more active, its often mis id'd. In fact, there are peeps that don't consider it to be a true classification and lump them in with t peruvianus. I have read reports of it being awesome.
Has any one heard of t Glaucus? It's also lumped in with that group. I have one, but it has never been tested. Looks likenit would be the goodness.
A big fat cuzcoensis could look like a macrogonus and it's not active. It is damn pretty though. I had a big one that I bought as kk242 ( not the good one obviously) but I hacked it down, planted the tip and log propagated a chunk. The rest was not interesting. I wish I'd just let the GORGeOus plant grow. now I have a clump of tiny ones pupping from the bade. Thorny bastard.
To wrap this post up...
Your next Mac may be totally different. It's like buying p. Torch. There is much variety, keep digging and plant the tips. You can haves good one multiplying for the rest of your day.
Although there seems to be some extra special clones out there, I never read about dud achuma.
Long live achuma.... I 2nd that
All posts written by Madcap should be regarded as fiction.