joedirt wrote:
Steely I agree I don't really align with either party. I'm not saying the democrats are the saints here...but they are better than the Tea Klan. We certainly do need more than one party....but we also need more than 2. I rarely get my news form the major channels, but if I do CNBC and ABC are not to bad. Fox news is so sensationalized that you know they are making shit up. The problem is the majority of Americans are so disconnected from reality because of broadcasting like Reality TV and Glenn Beck that they don't know the difference between the parties. They just no the 'other' one is evil...and the ignorance is way larger on the hard right than the hard left. People that actually think the financial crisis happened under Obama's watch, or the ones that think Obama is the antichrist are the people I"m railing against here. . .
This is only my opinion, take it for what it's worth to you:
CNN, for example, tries to be unbiased, but to me, leans more toward the Democratic party because of the type of people the sponsors are. All media channels based within the U.S. American democracy follow that same kind of path. And in my eyes, blatant insults are the lowest form of journalism meant to appeal to some specific generalized population, and are sadly common throughout all channels.
What I'm believe the outcome would be if those said sponsors were to be researched:
MSNBC - Democratic party equivalent of Fox News
ABC - Democratic party
CNBC - Democratic party
Fox News - ...
CNN - Democratic party
Though, by claiming any one of them lies means simply degrading ourselves to todays childish political games; discrediting your opponent instead of negotiating (The Wisconsin unraveled to be perfect example, there was a complete failure to do so on either side except for one lone republican). What about the events that led up to now that forced the Republican party to approach "negotiations" so aggressively with the Democratic party? With the Democratic system, all parties hold part of the blame all the time.
The Tea Party consists of normal (Whatever normal means to you) people just the same as any other party. Both sides do a great job of representing the extremists as the entire party.
joedirt wrote:
Anyway I'm in a much better mood today so I apologize for lashing out on the board yesterday.
No apology necessary, I love debating, so if anything, I apologize.
In all seriousness, ranting is simply a raw form of expression and passion. People need to try it more often (some need to cut back a little).
More on topic:
Net Neutrality
There have been bills, acts, and agreements of all sorts that have been put forth in an attempt to place some kind of ownership on the internet. But why wouldn't the very same President who inherited the worst economic crisis since the real great depression, try to do so? He's desperate for measures agreeable to all parties, right now, that is the lowering of our debt and most importantly, the gain of money.
Do not listen to anything, "Steely" says. He is a made up character that his owner likes to role play with. His owner is very delusional and everything he says is completely untrue and ridiculous.
Hate is the choice of a clouded mind.
-"It takes humility to remember who we are"-
"There has to be evil so that good can prove its purity above it." - Buddha