I was very pleased to read a major newspaper publication, "The Star", containing an article that reflects positively on the use of psychedelic drugs. The article focuses on the potential medical use of the drugs.... and when I use the term "medical", I refer to people who have been diagnosed by a medical professional with some kind of disease.
I thought this article was very good in its de-brainwashing, and disarming tone. The article talks about all the false and negative stigmas that have been associated with with psychedelics since the 60's. The author talks about about the "knee jerK" reaction that many people have when even hearing about psychedelics, they are instantly against the very idea. But the article helps to direct a reasonable, and factual attitude toward the subject. I am very happy with the article because I think it is exactly what is needed. Before anything really happens with the whole legality of these substances, people have at least got to get rid of their misinformation, and knee jerk reaction when hearing about psychedelic drugs. What's needed first is for the general population to not instantly shiver at the thought of psychedelic drugs. People at least first need to realize, "mabye these drugs aren't inherently evil for everyone. In fact maybe they are good for some. Maybe not for me, but if someone else wants to....".
I was also very happy to read that studies suggest that the psychedelic drugs in question actually DECREASE symptoms of schizophrenia. It seems there is a current assumption that hallucinogenic drugs cause schizophrenia, but that does not seem to be the case.
Strangely though, there is a picture of a guy in Japan holding up packages of magic mushrooms for sale. The article doesn't say anything about that guy, nor does it mention that those mushrooms are illegal in North America. I wish. Also, unfortunately, the article doens't mention dmt, which I find strange. The article talks about lsd and mdma being used as treatments for depression, PTSD, and for emergency suicide prevention (particularly mushrooms for suicide prevention). I wonder why no talk of ayahuasca, or pharmahuasca? The Amazon has a whole culture that associates Ayahuasca with healing and spirituality. I would have thought the healing potential of ayahuasca would be known by the scientists by now. Interestingly, no talk of mescaline either. I wonder why mdma, but not mescaline.
Just one thing I'd like to add because I'm sure every "spiritual" user feels the same way..... although I am pleased with the article and I think it is appropriate for this period in history, there is a tone in it which is a bit annoying.... as it suggests that the "medical" use of drugs is somehow different, and more acceptable than personal use. The suggestion is that it's ok to use those drugs if you have a "real" problem, and a doctor says you can use the drugs, but not if an individual chooses to use them for spiritual or recreational purposes, or for the purpose of adventure or exploring life, or having the right to choose what you put in your own body. I find that as ridiculous as a person having an attitude that suggests that exercise should only be done by people who have
real
medical problems, and only if it is prescribed by a doctor. Such an attitude would suggest that people shouldn't exercise merely for recreation, or personal exploration, or because exercise is healthy and feels good whether or not you have been diagnosed with a medical problem. I know a mainstream newspaper probably couldn't say such a thing, but eventually they should. That's a step for another day.
http://www.thestar.com/n...ychedelic-drugs-are-back