Infundibulum wrote:cretination wrote:Why would one end up with a mixture of salts and freebase alkaloids? Aren't cacti alkaloids in base form in vivo? Wouldn't methanol (awesome cactus solvent by the by) only extract the freebase alkaloids without converting any to salts?
There's hardly any freebase mescaline in the cactus and what the methanol extracts is some mescaline salt among myriads of other stuff. No freebases.
cretination wrote:Aren't cacti alkaloids in base form in vivo?
Good question but basically no. It would be interesting to further enquire on the type of reasoning that brought you to this conclusion.
Ditto that. The alkaloids are in salt form. The pH of the plant is acidic (like 5-6 or so) not alkaline. The pKa of mescaline is 9.56. That means the plant would need to have a pH of 11.56 for the mescaline to be 99% freebase. In other words, the plant would need to have a pH higher than sodium carbonate! That's simply not possible. The plant would die.
This idea that alkaloids occur in plants as freebase is a strange one that's been spread all over the net. I don't know where this incorrect idea originated, but it's simply not possible for alkaloids like mescaline.
Methanol doesn't seem to dissolve salts of mescaline very well. SWIM has tried using methanol to extract mescaline from cactus (he used a Soxhlet, so there was heat involved) before and it didn't work well. Water worked much better. Mescaline loves water. Even freebase mescaline is soluble in water.
You may remember me as 69Ron. I was suspended years ago for selling bunk products under false pretenses. I try to sneak back from time to time under different names, but unfortunately, the moderators of the DMT-Nexus are infinitely smarter than I am.
If you see me at the waterpark, please say hello. I'll be the delusional 50 something in the American flag Speedo, oiling up his monster guns while responding to imaginary requests for selfies from invisible teenage girls.