here is some interesting info compairing .... dream states..with ...psychedelic states







NCBINCBI Logo
Skip to main content
Skip to navigation
Resources
How To
About NCBI Accesskeys

PMC
US National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health
Search database
PMC
Search term
Search
Advanced Journal listHelp
COVID-19 Information

Public health information (CDC)Research information (NIH)SARS-CoV-2 data (NCBI)Prevention and treatment information (HHS)Español

Try out PMC Labs and tell us what you think. Learn More.


Journal ListCurr Neuropharmacolv.15(7); 2017 OctPMC5652011
Logo of currneuro
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2017 Oct; 15(7): 1032–1042.
Published online 2017 Oct. doi: 10.2174/1573413713666170619092629
PMCID: PMC5652011
PMID: 28625125
Dreams and Psychedelics: Neurophenomenological Comparison and Therapeutic Implications
Rainer Kraehenmann*
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Go to:
Abstract
Background:
A resurgence of neurobiological and clinical research is currently underway into the therapeutic potential of serotonergic or ‘classical’ psychedelics such as the prototypical psychedelic drug lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) psilocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine) and ayahuasca – a betacarboline- and dimethyltryptamine (DMT)-containing Amazonian beverage. The aim of this review is to introduce readers to the similarities and dissimilarities between psychedelic states and night dreams and to draw conclusions related to therapeutic applications of psychedelics in psychiatry.

Methods:
Research literature related to psychedelics and dreaming is reviewed and these two states of consciousness are systematically compared. Relevant conclusions with regard to psychedelic-assisted therapy will be provided.

Results:
Common features between psychedelic states and night dreams include perception mental imagery emotion activation fear memory extinction and sense of self and body. Differences between these two states are related to differential perceptual input from the environment clarity of consciousness and meta-cognitive abilities. Therefore psychedelic states are closest to lucid dreaming which is characterized by a mixed state of dreaming and waking consciousness

Conclusion:
The broad overlap between dreaming and psychedelic states supports the notion that psychedelics acutely induce dreamlike subjective experiences which may have long-term beneficial effects on psychosocial functioning and well-being. Future clinical studies should examine how therapeutic outcome is related to the acute dreamlike effects of psychedelics.

Keywords: Dreams, psychedelics, subjective experience, perception, mental imagery, emotion activation, fear memory extinction, sense of self and body
Go to:
1. INTRODUCTION
The tendency of dreams and psychedelic drugs to induce visionary experiences inspired scientific and cultural development for thousands of years [1-6]. Given that both rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) and psychedelics induce profound effects on perception, mental imagery, emotion activation, fear memory extinction, and sense of self and body [7, 8], and given that both dreams and psychedelics share phenomenological and neurophysiological features [9, 10], it has been hypothesized that dreams may be understood as prototypical hallucinatory experiences [11] and that, on the other hand, psychedelic states may be understood as “experimental

dreams” [12]. The latter notion is supported by previous studies showing that serotonin is crucially involved in the regulation of sleep-wake cycles [13, 14] and that the serotonergic psychedelic lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) may facilitate REMS in humans [15-17]. A close relationship between hallucinatory experiences and REMS is also supported by evidence that in narcolepsy, a REMS disorder, complex visual hallucinations are best treated by serotonergic antidepressants [18]. Given that both dreams and psychedelics acutely induce characteristic changes in subjective experience, one may hypothesize that therapeutic effects of psychedelics in psychiatric patients may be mediated by the dreamlike experiences of the patients during psychedelic treatment. Therefore, in this short review, dreams and psychedelic states will first be reviewed separately, followed by a direct comparison in terms of similarities and differences. Finally, therapeutic implications and conclusions will be drawn based on available evidence.

Go to:
2. DREAMS
2.1. Perception and Mental Imagery
Dreams can be extremely vivid, sensorimotor hallucinatory experiences which predominantly involve the visual domain, follow a narrative structure, and occur during sleep, when the brain is disconnected from the environment [19]. Whether dreaming is more closely related to bottom-up perception or top-down imagery is still a matter of debate [20], especially given that both visual mental imagery and perception share similar cortical representations [21]. According to Hobson’s activation-synthesis model [22], dreams are produced by chaotic bottom-up activation of sen sory cortex in the brainstem (e.g., PGO waves1) during REMS, activation of the visual cortex, and secondary interpretation and synthesizing by mnemonic and higher-order frontal areas. Despite the initial lack of structured information, the activation-synthesis model views the secondary elaboration of spontaneous brainstem signals as a constructive process – a synthesis where images from the memory systems are called up to instill some meaning into random signals. In contrast, the neurocognitive model explains dreaming as the top-down product of higher-level mental imagery [23]. According to this model, dreaming is understood as “the purest form of imagination” [19] which is an involuntary but organized mental act that originates in abstract knowledge and figurative thinking and which is then signaled back to perceptive areas to generate “embodied simulations” [24] of the real world. It has been postulated [25, 26] that virtual realities are simulated by the dreaming brain to prepare people for integrative functions during wakefulness, including learning and higher-order consciousness. The neurocognitive model of dreaming is supported by evidence indicating that brain areas supporting sensory processing are activated during mental imagery in the absence of perceptual inputs [27, 28] and from lesion studies showing that lesions in the temporo-parieto-occipital junction affect both dreaming and mental imagery during wakefulness [29, 30].

2.2. Emotion Activation and Fear Memory Extinction
Apart from profound visual effects, the most distinctive feature of dreams is the activation of emotions. However, emotions are not randomly activated in dreams – instead, there is evidence [31-33] that dreams often appear to be biased towards negative emotions, particularly anxiety, fear, and aggression – although this has not been consistently confirmed [11]. Importantly, there is substantial evidence [31, 34] indicating that dreams serve an adaptive function because they support the regulation of emotions, especially fear. Given that in dreams, the dream self is re-exposed to fear-conditioned stimuli in a realistic but safe simulation of the world [35], and given that repeated exposure to a fear-conditioned stimulus (CS; e.g., a tone) without the reinforcement of the unconditioned stimulus (US; e.g., a foot shock) leads to the gradual decrease in the expression of the fear-conditioned response (CR; e.g., freezing), fear extinction may be a crucial mechanism underlying the fear regulation function of dreaming. This notion is supported by neurophysiological evidence [36, 37] that during human REMS, significant increase in regional brain activity has been found in the limbic emotion processing network, including amygdala, hippocampus, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) – brain regions which support memory consolidation processes, in particular emotional memories and fear memory [38]. Given that fear extinction is not simple erasing of an acquired fear memory, but rather the formation of new extinction memories via associative learning of CS in new, non-fearful contexts [39], facilitation of fear memory extinction by dreaming has been related to the following cognitive processes [34]: 1) deconstruction of coherent episodic fear memories into isolated memory units which are largely dissociated from their episodic (real-world) context, 2) recombination of isolated memory units into a constant and phenomenologically coherent flow of dream imagery, leading to novel context representations that reinforce the development of new extinction memories, and 3) emotion expression to ensure maximal allocation of attentional and neural resources. Emotion expression is further enhanced by the “reality mimesis” characteristic of dream phenomenology, i.e., the fact that dreams feel real and that dream imagery is experienced as waking perception [39]. Despite the mechanism of fear extinction, which does not alter the original memory per se but rather creates a new memory in a safe context, dreaming might also directly rewrite fear memories via memory reconsolidation [40-43]. Schiller et al. [42], for example showed that in humans, old fear memories can be permanently updated with non-fearful information if this new information is provided during the reconsolidation window, i.e., immediately following fear memory retrieval. Most interestingly, it was shown that specific fear memories can be selectively attenuated during wake [43] or during sleep [40] if reactivation of the old fear memory is combined with pharmacological compounds which temporarily disrupt amygdala functioning.

2.3. Cognition
From the perspective of the waking state, dreams often appear chaotic and difficult to comprehend because of cognitive bizarreness, i.e., incongruities, indeterminacy or discontinuities in the dream narrative [26]. Cognitive bizarreness has been closely related to the neural “signature” of REMS with random brainstem activation and secondary activation in higher-order areas (AIM model) [26, 44-46]. In addition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and parietal cortex [31] are consistently deactivated during REMS. The DLPFC is involved in goal-directed and context-dependent stimulus selection [47]. Therefore, deactivation of the DLPFC during REMS might partially explain the lack of volitional capabilities and the uncritical acceptance of many bizarre elements in the dream [31]. In addition, it has been shown that during REMS, cortical activity in the high frequency gamma range is absent [48]. Given that gamma frequency activity is related to neural integration among different cortical regions, which is critical for cognitive functions, this lack of gamma frequency activity during REMS may underlie cognitive bizarreness during REMS dreaming [19, 26].

However, there is accumulating evidence indicating that cognitive bizarreness is just “the other side of the coin” of a more fluid and flexible cognitive processing during REMS compared to non-REMS (NREMS) and waking state [49]. In this vein, dreaming has been conceptualized as off-line, unconscious thought-in-progress in which associative mechanisms and visual imagery are less tightly constrained by prefrontal cortical control mechanisms, and hence are less strictly confined by logical reasoning but predominantly driven by underlying emotions [50-53]. Compared to waking mentation, therefore, dreaming has the cognitive advantage of facilitating creative insight – the forming of associative elements into new image-based combinations which lead to greater understanding and which are useful to solve a problem [54]. This notion is further supported by some data which support the idea that dreaming cognition can be superior to wake cognition in tasks which require cognitive flexibility [55], formation of new associations [56, 57], or insight into hidden abstract rules [58].

2.4. Sense of Self and Body
Dreaming always induces alterations in the sense of self and body. Self-centered perspective is usually strong and vivid in dreams: the dreamer is inside the scene, taking part in the dream events from a first-person perspective, or looking at the events as external observer. However, the dreamer is usually unaware that the content coming from the imaginative activity is only the product of his imaginative activity. In fact, the dreamer interprets the phenomena as coming from external reality. This “single-mindedness” [59] is typical for REMS dreams and reflects a lack of meta-cognition, i.e. lack of insight into the fact that one is currently dreaming and the capacity to reflect and to make conscious decisions during dreams [60]. Loss of self and body boundaries is frequently occurring in dreams, and ranges from wake-like representation of the body to complete absence of body boundaries [61]. Weak body boundaries are often occurring in REMS dreams (“mini-me”), whereas strong body boundaries are often occurring in lucid dreams [61]. At a neurophysiological level, deactivation of certain brain regions during REMS may underlie the experience of a minimal body self: the parietal lobe and the precuneus have been related to memory-guided imagery and visuospatial processing [62]. The deactivation of these regions during REMS may impair the formation of body representations [63, 64].

A major exception to REMS dream-induced loss of self and body boundaries is lucid dreaming, a rare state of sleep where subjects regain reflective capabilities, becoming aware that they are currently dreaming, and having full access to their memory [65]. Here, an interesting aspect is the occurrence of a “divided self”: one part watches and the other part dreams. Furthermore, the watching self can influence dream continuation and command changes in dream content [66]. Previous electrophysiological (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies showed that lucid dreaming is related to increased phase synchrony and increased gamma frequency activity at around 40 Hz in fronto-temporal brain regions [67-69]. A recent transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) study by Voss et al. [70] proved that fronto-temporal current stimulation in the lower gamma band at around 25 and 40 Hz during REMS induced lucid dreaming. Given that 40 Hz power has been correlated with waking consciousness, this indicates that lucid dreaming is a “hybrid state” of both wakefulness and REMS [69]. Interestingly, it has been found that the precuneus, a brain region related to perspective taking, agency, and visual awareness, showed the strongest increase in activation during lucid compared to non-lucid REMS, consistent with the exceptional brightness, visual clarity, and intensity of colors of lucid dream sceneries [68]. Taken together, there is consistent evidence that lucid dreaming is related to increased activation in prefrontal, temporal, and parietal cortical regions, and increased cortical activity in the gamma frequency range – both of which are absent in REMS dreaming and which need to be restored in order to become lucid [26].

In the waking state, nondual awareness2 refers to an empty mind with no phenomenological content, where there is no affect and cognition, and where any sense of physical boundaries and separateness between self and other is dissolved [72]. At a neurophysiological level, nondual awareness has been related to decreased anti-correlation between activity in extrinsic and intrinsic networks of the brain, which are mediating attention to the external environment and internal states, respectively [73]. Nondual awareness, or “dream witnessing” [74] may also occur during dreaming and even during deep sleep, but not as an inherent property of sleep, but rather as a consequence of longstanding meditative practice and habituation which is transferred from the waking state into the sleep and dreaming state.

Go to:
3. PSYCHEDELICS
3.1. Perception and Mental Imagery
Classical psychedelics3 are a unique class of psychoactive drugs whose most distinguishing feature is the “capacity reliably to induce states of altered perception, thought, and feeling that are not experienced otherwise except in dreams or at times of religious exaltation” [75]. Psychedelic-induced states are characterized by enhanced perceptual sensitivity to external and internal stimuli [76]. At a neurophysiological level, it has been shown [77, 78] that psychedelics disrupt information processing in inhibitory cortico-striato-thalamocortical (CSTC) feedback loops that have been implicated in sensory gating of internal and external information to the cortex. This psychedelic-induced disinhibition leads to an inability to filter, inhibit, and screen out exteroceptive and interoceptive stimuli, which in turn leads to bottom-up sensory overload of higher-level cortical regions and the formation of hallucinations [76]. There is also evidence [79, 80] that psychedelics lead to visual hallucinations via serotonergic receptor activation in visual cortical regions, leading to a processing mode in which stimulus-driven cortical excitation is disrupted by stimulus-independent (“spontaneous”) neuronal excitation through modulation of alpha oscillations. Furthermore, de Araujo et al. [81] recently investigated the neuronal mechanisms underlying psychedelic-induced visual mental imagery using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). They first asked subjects to passively view images of people, animals, or trees (perception condition). Then, they asked participants to close their eyes and voluntarily generate a picture they had just seen before (mental imagery condition). The authors found that ayahuasca significantly increased activation in the mental imagery condition within an extended mental imagery network, including early visual areas (BA 17, 18, 19), parahippocampal gyrus, middle temporal cortex, and frontal cortex (BA10). Most importantly, they showed that for ayahuasca, activation in primary visual cortex during mental imagery was comparable to the activation during perception, indicating that ayahuasca enhances the intensity of voluntary imagery to the same level of a perceived image, lending a status of reality to inner experiences. They also showed that ayahuasca-induced changes in primary visual cortex (BA17) were preceding and leading the activation patterns in higher-level areas, indicating that ayahuasca-induced imagery is initiated in BA17, but then complemented by activity of higher-level cortical areas involved with episodic memory retrieval and the processing of contextual associations, such as BA30 and BA37, which might feed memory-related content back to primary visual areas. A recent fMRI-study by Carhart-Harris et al. [79] using LSD supports the notion that psychedelic-induced hallucinations are closely related to activity in primary visual cortex.

However, contrary to the notion that psychedelic-induced visual hallucinations are caused by bottom-up driven neuronal activity, there is substantial evidence that psychedelics induce visual hallucinations primarily via neuronal activation of prefrontal cortical or temporal areas as well as top-down spreading of activation to parietal and primary visual regions – a mechanism that is also underlying visual mental imagery [82-84]: 1. classic psychedelics produce their effects primarily via activation of postsynaptic cortical serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptors on pyramidal neurons in layer V of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), leading to glutamate-dependent downstream activity changes [85]; 2. visual hallucinations may be caused by neuronal stimulation of PFC [86] or temporal lobe [37, 87], and spreading activation to primary visual cortex; and 3. psychedelic hallucinations are related to increased functional connectivity between PFC and primary visual cortex [79], indicating that psychedelic hallucinations substantially depend on PFC regions, and not solely on primary visual regions. A third explanatory model for psychedelic hallucinations would be a mixed bottom-up/top-down model, where visual noise is fed into higher-level areas, which then interpret and make sense of the noise [88]. Basically, this is similar with a projective test, such as the Rorschach [89], but instead of using external ambiguous stimuli, this mechanism interprets internally-generated visual noise. This notion is supported by evidence that a substantial proportion of psychedelic hallucinations are bottom-up driven, elementary hallucinations, i.e., simple geometric forms, colors, and wave-like or contracting visual distortions (Klüver’s form constants) related to activation in primary visual cortex; and by behavioral studies on the other hand which indicate that psychedelic imagery is strongly influenced by higher-level regions in the brain, given that psychedelic imagery is highly structured, thematically elaborated, and strongly determined by personality aspects [90, 91]. In future neuroimaging studies investigating the neural mechanisms underlying psychedelic-induced hallucinations, top-down versus bottom-up connectivity changes should be specifically analyzed, for example by using dynamic causal modelling approaches or by concurrent electrical cortical stimulation.

3.2. Emotion Activation and Fear Memory Extinction
Consistent evidence indicates that psychedelics intensify and broaden emotional experiencing, both in terms of emotional memories and affective state [92]. These emotional changes often determine course and content of psychedelic percepts and imagery [93]. Although elevated mood states and pleasant feelings are most frequent [94-96], anxiety reactions may occur, especially at higher doses when normal cognitive frames of reference are diminished (“dread of ego dissolution”) [95]. There is consistent evidence [97-102] that psychedelics modulate neural processes related to anxiety and threat, especially in brain regions which are relevant for conditioned fear memory, such as amygdala, hippocampus, and ACC. Moreover, there is accumulating evidence from animal studies [103-105] indicating that psychedelics may facilitate extinction of conditioned fear memory by enhancing BDNF-dependent neuroplasticity. Importantly, it has been found that psychedelics also enhance associative learning and memory consolidation [103, 106]. Therefore, psychedelic-induced retrieval of emotional memories, especially contextual information related to fear and anxiety (CS, conditioned stimulus, e.g., a traumatic memory), might facilitate fear extinction via effects on memory modulation and re-consolidation if there is no reinforcement by the unconditioned stimulus (US, e.g. aggressor). Therefore, it is conceivable that psychedelics might facilitate conditioned fear extinction if the conditioned fear memory is retrieved (e.g., via exposure to relevant stimuli), and if the psychedelic-experience during and after this fear exposure is modified and re-consolidated by positive, self-protective information within a trustful interpersonal context.

3.3. Cognition
Psychedelics dose-dependently impair vigilance and induce cognitive dysfunctions, including reduced attentional performance, increased distractibility, and reduced spatial working memory [107-112]. Despite these cognitive deficits, evidence from animal and human studies indicates that psychedelics may enhance cognition, including associative reasoning [113, 114], thinking in metaphors and symbols [115], and creative problem solving [116, 117]. At a neurophysiological level, it has been found that psychedelic-induced decreases of DLPFC oscillatory activity [118], as well as changes in functional connectivity between regions in frontal cortex [119], might explain the psychedelics-induced changes in cognitive style, including reduced reality testing and increased lateral thinking [120]. A recent psychopharmacological study by Kraehenmann et al. [121] tested the hypothesis that LSD produces dreamlike waking imagery. The authors used a guided mental imagery task and quantified cognitive bizarreness of guided mental imagery reports as a standardized formal measure of dream mentation. It was found that LSD, compared with placebo, significantly increased cognitive bizarreness. The LSD-induced increase in cognitive bizarreness was positively correlated with the LSD-induced loss of self-boundaries and cognitive control.

3.4. Sense of Self and Body
Psychedelics induce a broad range of alterations in the sense of self, including loss of self and body boundaries, self-control, and volition which are similar to depersonalization, a psychotic-like psychosomatic syndrome [121, 122]. Alterations in body feelings are closely related to self-changes, and are very frequent in psychedelic states. They range from numbness and paresthesia in body parts to feelings of separation from the body, feelings of the unreality of the body or its parts, and body distortions or variations in size, including feelings of denial or estrangement: “in one subject the depersonalization proceeded to a degree where his body was projected as an influencing machine which made him see pictures (hallucinations) and controlled his thoughts, feelings, and actions” [123]. Psychedelic-induced changes in the sense of self and body are frequently paired with changes in perception and imagery [93, 122]. Savage describes this for some of his patients during LSD treatment: “the boundary between his perceptions and his inner feelings is lost, and the distortions which he sees in the faces of other people can sometimes be traced back to the projection of his own self-image. One patient saw other patients as small, flat, yellow, wherein he reveals his feelings about himself. Another saw the nurse as a kind faced and concerned, wherein he projected his need for her concern” [123].

The psychedelic-induced shift from a self-centered perspective to a selflessness-perspective often facilitates a state of nondual awareness, or unity of consciousness, where the individual, or narrative self is shifted towards the pre-reflective experience of the self (minimal self). This may generate a transpersonal self-perspective, including feelings of connectedness with people and environment, positive affective state, and reduced helplessness or anxiety when confronted with challenging memories or fantasies [100, 124, 125]. This state of self has also been described as self-transcendence, where past experiences and present conflicts are seen with lucid awareness and without distortion coming from biological or social conditioning [126].

Go to:
4. DISCUSSION
4.1. Similarities and Differences Between Dreams and Psychedelic States
The comparison of dreams with psychedelic states shows that both consciousness states share some similarities (see Table ​11). First, they are characterized by vivid imaginary experiences which predominantly involve the visual domain. Although the underlying neurobiological mechanisms are yet unclear, there is evidence that visual experiences in these states share some features of bottom-up perception and top-down mental imagery. Second, both states activate emotional memories and affects, mostly in the direction of elevated mood states, and frequently paired with retrieval of fear memory. Imaginary exposure to fear-conditioned memory may be a crucial function in both states. Third, cognition in dreams and psychedelic states may both decrease logical and increase associative reasoning, similar with creative thinking [121, 127-130]. This may be related to deactivations in prefrontal control regions such as DLPFC. And fourth, changes in the sense of self occur in both states [121, 131], leading to depersonalization, loss of self and body boundaries, and nondual awareness. The similarities between psychedelic states and dreaming are summarized by Grinspoon and Bakalar [132]: “There are good reasons for applying the term ‘oneirogenic,’ producing dreams, to psychedelic drugs. In its imagery, emotional tone, and vagaries of thought and self-awareness, the drug trip, especially with eyes closed, resembles no other state so much as a dream”.

Table 1
Neurophenomenological comparison between dreaming and psychedelic states.

Category Dreaming Psychedelic State
Vigilancea ↓ sleep ↓ drowsiness
Perceptionb ↓ disconnection from environment ↑ eyes open
Mental imageryc ø simpleh
↑ complex ↑ eyes closed
↑ eyes closed
Emotion activation ↑ ↑
Conditioned fear memory extinctiond ↑
↓ recurring night-mares ↑
↓ horror trips
Cognition ↑ bizarreness
↑ creativity ↑ bizarreness
↑ creativity
Self and body boundariese ↓ REMSi dreams
↑ lucid dreams ↓
Clear consciousnessf ø REMS dreams
↑ lucid dreams ↑
Unity of consciousnessg ø REMS dreams
↑ lucid dreams ↑
aArousal level on the sleep-wake spectrum.

bSensory (e.g. visual) experience caused by sensory (e.g., visual) stimulation.

cSensory (e.g. visual) experience in the absence of sensory (e.g., visual) stimulation.

dDecline in conditioned fear response following nonreinforced exposure to a feared conditioned stimulus.

eBoundary between self-representation and object-representation.

fMeta-awareness of current state of consciousness.

gNondual awareness following complete loss of self boundaries.

hException: hypnagogic imagery in the transitional state from wakefulness to sleep; and hypnopompic imagery in the state leading out of sleep.

iRapid eye movement sleep, or paradoxical sleep.

↑, increase; ↓, decrease; ø, minimal or no change.

There are also some differences between these two states (see Table ​11). First, elementary percepts such as geometric forms and abstract movements - which frequently occur in psychedelic states - only rarely occur in normal REMS dreams, but do occur in lucid dreams [133]. This is supported by recent evidence indicating that psychedelics strongly activate primary visual regions, correlating with psychedelic imagery [79, 81]. Second, although both states enhance mental imagery, there are at least gradual differences between psychedelic states where external stimuli from the body and the outside world are still influencing conscious experience (especially during eyes-open conditions), and dreams, where consciousness is decoupled from the environment, generating intrinsic simulations of the world and the body-self [19]. And third, typical REMS dreams are “single-minded” [59] and lack meta-cognition, whereas lucid dreams and psychedelic states are characterized by “clear consciousness” [121], which means a very nuanced, emotional and intellectual clarity of mind, as well as remembrance and reflection of current and past circumstances and relationships [12].

Taken together, although both dreams and psychedelic states share a common phenomenological and neurobiological basis, there are also some differences between them, which are mainly due to greater perceptual influences from the external environment, clarity of consciousness and meta-cognitive abilities in psychedelic states compared to REMS.

Lucid dreams, however, show a comparable degree of perceptual clarity and meta-cognitive capacity. Therefore, both psychedelic states and lucid dreams may be conceptualized as hybrid states of consciousness [69, 121], sharing features of both dreaming and waking consciousness.

4.2. Therapeutic Implications
Given that psychedelic states share many characteristics with lucid dreaming, it is highly probable that positive effects of dreaming on psychosocial functioning and well-being may also apply for psychedelics. Most importantly, there is accumulating evidence that our self is not sleeping during dreams, but on the contrary that dreams intensify self-relevant processes by virtue of their ability to induce self-relevant, virtual reality “play-grounds” [134]. Importantly, dreams are, per definition, subjective experiences, and there are strong indications [19, 66, 121, 134, 135] that subjective experiences in dreams and psychedelic states are not just “epiphenomena” of neuronal wiring, but are key to promote self-knowledge and ensuing therapeutic change.

The notion that psychedelic-induced self-relevant experiences are relevant to the therapeutic effects of psychedelics is explained by Soskin [136]: “LSD appeared to be of primary value in enabling the patient to transcend the network of learned social judgments that had previously constituted his sense of selfhood. In so doing, he established contact with his real self,...