Hi titus,
titus wrote:...and all that we've been asked to do is be a human for just a few decades... Nothing more, nothing less...
Cool, but I'm curious what "human" actually means.
Ethical directives? I think you aim at that.
Religious directives?
Law directives?
Natural tendencies directives?
Social media directives?
Personal directives?
Political directives?
Entheogenic directives?
etc etc ... all this stuff is seriously not co-axed, often straight in opposition.
A lot of the times being "human" is pointed towards not-animalistic, not barbaric.
But who the F* do we think we are? I think you had a good call with the ape analogy.
Apes who traded hair for synapses functionality.
Imho there is vanity to find in the human definition, especially in spirituality.
Romanticizing ourselves into higher positions, from there I think the call sprouts to be as such, as if it is not too much asked to be better than we actually are.
I think we can be ethical all we want, despise most of our basal natural stretches, to think only of love and friendship. I think it's possible in theory, but not in the natural suit we come in. Wishful thinking. Something WILL rumble from far below the lid you're sitting on, a present from mother nature. A gnarly piece of nature will come and surprises the holy values to shreds.
I'm not pessimistic, rather optimistic.
Be fair what you are, and you might have a better chance of guiding it instead of sitting on top of that lid where you put half of yourself under. One can wipe just that much of dirt under the carpet.
PS: I might have read you all wrong about this topic, but then be more clear please
PS2: sorry for the rant