Both harmine and harmaline hydrochloride
seem to form hydrates.
This might not make much difference pharmacologically (the dihydrate is 'only' 17% heavier compared to anhydrous HCl salt), but it's a huge difference from other standpoints (analytical, economical) and the presence of water might be an issue when recrystallizing harmalas from other solvents than water (?).
Another issue is that the
water of crystallization skews melting point measurement when assessing purity.
I assume the 'Manske' procedure results predominantly in the dihydrate salt, as harmalas crystallize from aqueous solution, picking up water in the process.
I am still pondering the idea of recrystallizing harmalas from anhydrous solvents, avoiding multiple 'Manskes' and lots of salt (which is a water contaminant).
Another advantages of the anhydrous salt are higer potency and less bulk (per gram). It has also more specific melting point.
I found some indirect suggestions that harmine and harmaline crystallize differently in various solvents, giving an opportunity of further purification of the pH-separated compounds. Finally, it seems having a solid acetate crystals is possible, which is also attractive:
To have a better idea about the weight differences between freebase and various HCl hydrates, here are the weights corresponding to 1 mole of harmaline, both absolute and relative (to freebase):
freebase:
214.263 g (1.00)
hydrochloride:
250.723 g (1.17)
hydrochloride hydrate:
268.738 g (1.25)
hydrochloride dihydrate:
286.75354 g (1.34)